Originally posted by AgentSmith
But how do you explain the impact damage which is clearly present?
It is there, something caused it - how would you cause it with explosives?
It seems pretty consistant with the dimensions of the wing itself.
Why on earth would you assume it was from a wing? There is NOTHING that indicates that at all and I fail to see how you can say it "seems pretty
consistent" with the dimension of the wing. In fact the "damage" within the drawn in lines is rather insignificant and certainly not constant and
is only visible on 2 columns. The notion that this was from the wing was merely dreamt up and there is nothing that backs it up. It could have been
from anything in the impact. You can't even tell from that pic where on the facade this was taken from.
The tail fin is angled and relatively fragile, it may have disintegrated, following the rest of the plane into the building.
So it disintegrated BEFORE it hit the building? This contradicts the video and all laws of physics. How could it disintegrate without even leaving a
scratch on the building? Ludicrous.
And once again, even if it was some other aircraft - where is it's tailfin and the corresponding mark on the wall? You still have the same problem to
prove your version.
This is why merc said your questions are "dumb". Because they are DUMB! This has been explained to your thick skull already. The potential
alternative crafts we are talking about are MUCH smaller and were likely packed with explosives. Any pieces that were obviously not part of a 757
were whisked away and only pics of the planted parts were presented.
ATC did have a contact which they tracked down to the Pentagon, as well as the countless witnesses so there had to be an aircraft of some sort at
Yeah so? Whoopdy do for ATS. Did they try contacting any of the witnesses that saw a smaller craft? Didn't think so. The drone would have been
painted like a commercial airliner AND there was a decoy commercial plane that flew low over the building to land at reagan airport simultaneous with
the attack. This could have been timed deliberately for confusion.
Where are the holes from the alternative craft's engines?
Again for the billionth time.....THE DRONE CRAFTS WERE SMALLER. A global hawk has a single engine mounted on top of the fuselage. Not all craft have
wing mounted engines. And even if it did the width between them would have been much smaller as would be the engines themselves and the damage would
be more consistent.
Where are the holes from the wings and if they disintegrated with only those marks I showed visible why can they not be 757 wings?
Why do you keep repeating the same questions? It doesn't make you look like you know what you are talking about. The wingspan was much smaller and
explosives and/or a missle could have easily helped destroy the much smaller craft. Perhaps those marks were from the wings of the drone. I do not
know. Neither do you. Point is there is no point speculating that since those marks are in no way definitively from the wings of anything.
Where is the tailfin of the 'real' aircraft and why is it possible it is not visible for some reason but the same can't apply to the 757?
Same question again????? Because it is MUCH SMALLER and designed differently.
Global Hawk....(no vertical stabilizer at all! Just a small tail fin.)
Height: 22 ft. 9.5 in
And the impact hole was 26 feet high. Perfect!
How could so many people confuse a missile, disguised or not, for a 757?
How come you switched from talking about a drone aircraft painted like a commercial airliner to missle for this question? This is another reason why
your questions are DUMB.
What caused the circular cutout in the fence around the generator that looks the same shape and size as an engine?
What about the dent in the top of the trailer? What caused that? Although I see a blown out fence I see no definitive "circular cut-out" in the
fence but I do see a big dent in the trailer. The craft was at least 10 feet off the ground because you can plainly see that it hit the trailer.
In the image at the top of this post, why is the impact damage obviously caused from the outside if it was caused by bombs inside?
If it wasn't caused from the outside, how come outer layers are damaged and inner layers are intact? How do these bombs work?
Why do you insist on being obtuse? I never claimed that this particular damage was caused by bombs. I was pointing out the blown out columns near
the ground. That damage could have been caused by other debris from the explosive impact. All I know is there is NOTHING that indicates it would
definitively be from the wings. Although I suppose it's possible that it was from the wings of the drone. I don't know. I'm not sure from where
on the facade those pics come.
What was the edged piece of something that caused those marks?
Same questions over and over? Why? As I said.....it could have been from debris. The damage is not "wing shaped" by any means so there is ZERO
reason to assume it was from a wing.
Why are you saying the columns are blown out? They look like they have tipped to the right in my opinon.
The fact that they are still exisiting at all after the impact of a 757 engine is suspect. But yes....the pic with a better view from closer up
clearly shows that they were blown out.
Now quit asking the same STUPID questions over and over.