People need to keep an open mind on this. An open mind is the best thing that you can have. This is one area that many conspiracy theorists have trouble grasping. I suspect the reason why is that people get attached to their celebrities. It's hard to face that the guy you are a fan of is really a double.

Paul went through an enormous change in late 1966. I've seen simply too much evidence that there are two separate men for me to ignore. I am sorry if I offend anyone, especially fans, but the Paul McCartney of 1966 and before is a different person from the Paul McCartney of 1967 to today.

Cheers

This is my favorite and most humorous of all conspiracies.
First time I read it I could not stop laughing. But hey, I am not saying it is not possible.

[edit on 28-5-2009 by cindymars]

Remember truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed, then it is violently rejected, then it is accepted as being self-evident.

To the person that made the comment about facial hair, well facial hair does not make your face grow long. Faulcon was trying to show the differences in the face and the only pics to compare Paul of 1966 to Paul of 1967 are where he is wearing a mustache. Facial hair was used to cover up differences in the face.

Paul went through an enormous change in late 1966.

One of the differences is that Paul had brown eyes & Faul has green eyes:







Faul's green eyes in the Strawberry Fields Forever video:



You can also see that the picture of Faul from "Spies Like Us" does not match up w/ a picture of Paul from "A Hard Day's Night":




[edit on 28-5-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]

[edit on 28-5-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]

I've been googling images again, this time concentrating on his hands. I can't get a decent enough set of pictures to make a comparison, but they don't look very different except for aging. The fingernails look about the same.

I saw one recent picture where he has his hand up showing the palm. If an old picture of Paul's palm could be found that would be a good comparison to make.

I can see that his eyes are a lot paler now but my eyes are a different colour now than they were some years ago.

I've gone from hazel to greyish green. If I wake in the night my eyes are bright green.

I'm trying to be as open-minded as I can and I'm not a fan of Paul McCartney's. Actually I can't stand his music but I do find this very interesting.

During my search I found a picture of Paul's son, James. He looks more like the elderly Paul we see today than the young Paul from the 60's. Unless he's Faul's son?

Another difference is that Faul is taller than Paul was by about 2 1/2 inches.

Here is a picture of Paul standing next to Ringo compared to Faul standing next to Ringo.



Another comp of Paul & Bill w/ Jane Asher:

Here are pictures of Paul's left and right palms taken when he was elderly:





The second picture is a lot clearer, but if you can enlarge either picture you can get a good idea of the head, heart and life lines.

Can anyone provide pictures of pre-1965/6 Paul's palms?

[edit on 29-5-2009 by berenike]

Here is a picture of The Beatles in their 'hairy' period. This is the best one I could find of them all standing together in a straight line. Paul and George are about the same height, I'd guess John is very slightly shorter and Ringo, of course, is very much shorter:



Here is an early picture of them on stage - George and Paul are standing together. Again, they look about the right height:



I have done my best to find pictures where they are standing straight, together and you can see their feet.

It should be remembered that stack-heeled boots were fashionable in those days which would add a little to their height. And they wouldn't all be wearing the same type of shoes at the same time.

As far as the pictures of Paul and Jane Asher go, she could have been wearing high heels in one picture and not in the other.

This is the best I can do with google, but anyone with a bit of patience can trawl through the pictures and make other comparisons - for or against the debate.

I'm looking for features which would be harder to alter than the shape of his face or nose.

He seems to have a little indent on his right ear lobe which has been pretty consistent in the photos I've looked at.

Further height comparison:







[edit on 29-5-2009 by berenike]

Originally posted by woodwytch
Anyhoo, in this dream of mine I saw Paul McCartney shot and killed ... he was inside a dimly lit room when this happened and there was more than one person in the room ... there was also a bit of pushing and jostling before the shooting (in my dream).

It was so vivid that I was sure there would be a news report in the coming days about the death of a Beatle. And there was ... but it was George Harrison. I thought this was a bit of a coincidence and that as predictive dreams go ... I was pretty s#*t !

That is really amazing. There are some of us who believe this is what happened, or something similar. I do believe Paul was murdered & replaced sometime around Sept 1966. I strongly suspect Illuminati involvement.

Something else that doesn't quite add up has to do with Mal Evans. He was the Beatles' roadie & knew them since 1963. He wrote an unpublished autobiography. It was part of an archive that went missing when Mal himself died in bizarre circumstances in 1976. Mal Evans was shot and killed by the police on 5 January 1976. The officers mistakenly believed that the air pistol Evans was holding was a rifle.

Before his death Evans was working on a book of memoirs called “Living The Beatles' Legend,” which he was supposed to deliver to publishers Grosset and Dunlap on 12 January 1976... On the night of Evans' death, he was so despondent that Fran Hughes (g/f) phoned his collaborator on his book, John Hoernie, and asked him to visit them. Hoernie said Evans told him to make sure that he finished "Living The Beatles' Legend"...

Evans was cremated on 7 January 1976 in Los Angeles. Evans' ashes were sent by post back to England, but were lost in the postal system... A suitcase that Evans was carrying at the time of his death, which was supposed to contain unreleased recordings, photos and other memorabilia, was lost by the police during the investigation. Portions of the book have been published, but not all.


[edit on 29-5-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]