It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by av8or
OK! everybody sitdown and SHUDUP!:MAD:...jeez
Forget about the bloody conveyer belt or whatever the wheels are doing to counter the motion of the belt. in terms of how a plane creates lift in order to become airbourne, THE BELT AND THE WHEELS ARE USELESS!
Any pilot or aviator with minimal hours will explain that unless there is airflow over the surface area of the aerofoil (the wing), there is no lift/upwards force vector i.e. NO FLIGHT! Suggested reading includes Bernoulie's theorum and the Venturi Effect. I suggest that anybody who even remotely thinks that flight is possible in this infernal arrangment of conveyer belts should seriously re-research their response/theories. I am completely astounded that there are so many people that would just blatently post a response to this sort of thing without actually looking into why aircraft fly in the first place. If flight was as simple as conveyer belts, we'd all be flying well before 1903. To the original author of the hypothetical which has atracted WAY too much attention for what it is (should have been debunked a bit earlier), it sounds like it was coming from the mind of a 12y/o to be quite frank, if so, i commend his ingenuity and initiative into aviation.
Ok so, no airflow, no lift, no flight. Got it!? good. PLEASE CLOSE THIS TOPIC
Originally posted by av8orp.s. anyone who wants proof, take a hike to your nearest flight school. I haven't been flying for the past 5 years for someone to tell me that relative motion and NO AIRFLOW can make an aircraft fly.
Originally posted by G8tsoHellrOpn4me
I'm a pilot. The relative motion of a plane is not controlled by the force that the gear has on the runway, it's by the propellor/engine moving air in the opposite direction. The gear are essentially free-moving and although with their increase in speed would come a slight increase in friction, it would in no way impede the aircraft from taking off...
Think of it this way...there's an aircraft in the air and some sort of device causes the wheels to spin up in the opposite direction of flight, it would have absolutely no affect on the aircraft's performance since the aircraft is moving due to the force of the prop/engine against the AIR MASS, NOT THE GROUND.
Originally posted by av8or
Originally posted by G8tsoHellrOpn4me
I'm a pilot. The relative motion of a plane is not controlled by the force that the gear has on the runway, it's by the propellor/engine moving air in the opposite direction. The gear are essentially free-moving and although with their increase in speed would come a slight increase in friction, it would in no way impede the aircraft from taking off...
Think of it this way...there's an aircraft in the air and some sort of device causes the wheels to spin up in the opposite direction of flight, it would have absolutely no affect on the aircraft's performance since the aircraft is moving due to the force of the prop/engine against the AIR MASS, NOT THE GROUND.
ok.....shall i draw in crayon this time.....
you missed my point COMPLETELY. In saying the gear was usless, i ment in regards to what the question was asking. don't you think i know that the wheels do SFA for the aircraft's motion!? they're just there for a smooth landing :p If the question is really saying the a/c isn't moving in relation to the conveyer belt then yes, all we're talking about there is a simple catapult, like an aircraft carrier. The way it was interpreted and i'm pretty sure it keeps getting interpretted is that the plane is stationary relative to the viewer/air and that the wheels were moving freely over the belt like something running on top of a rolling log, in that case then, no becasue there would obviously be no airflow ergo no lift, no flight. Thats all i'm trying to say
Originally posted by ghostAs was stated earilier, the Backwards speed of the treadmill is Equal to the forward speed of the treadmill. This makes the net speed of the plane in relation to the stationary ground 0. With a net speed of zero, you will not get any airflow over the wings! Without airflow, there can be NO lift![edit on 15-2-2006 by ghost]