It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Just because you can't understand the designer or higher power doesn't mean that there wasn't one initially.
It is good that some in the scientific community strive to improve upon their understanding and don't stay with antiquated ideas, don't you think?
The likelihood of matter - much less consciousness - springing into being through pure chance in a void of space, WITHOUT an Intelligent Designer of some kind, is astronomically small
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
The likelihood of matter - much less consciousness
- springing into being through pure chance in a void of space, WITHOUT an Intelligent Designer of some kind, is astronomically small
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Mathematics, astronomy and radio astronomy, all point to the Universe not being infinite at all, just extremely large. So your premise falls apart.
Originally posted by riley
How? Your idea is like assuming a truck full of organically freshly picked fruit couldn't possibly have a bug on it.
Originally posted by riley
We don't even know if Mars has had life on it.. or europa.
Originally posted by riley
Also.. the universe probably consists of more than one universe [Steven Hawkins].. ours could be the tip of the iceburg.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Whether it is a small Universe or a large one does not mean that there was not an Intelligent Designer that started it.
Originally posted by riley
It does not mean there is. Your maths hasn't proven anything. Where was this designer?
Originally posted by riley
Existing outside time and space? Notice the word 'existence'.. E=mc2; you need time and space to do that.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
To have ANYTHING come about through PURE CHANCE is very small. To have LIFE come about ANYWHERE through PURE CHANCE, is infinitesimally small.
Originally posted by riley
Incorrect- there is no such thing as 'pure chance' but unsentimental action and reaction which are part of ongoing processes. If you would like to know more look up 'Fractel theory'.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Thus, logically, a higher power must have been involved.
Originally posted by riley
Must? this assumption is not logical at all. If you feel more comfortable feeling like everything that happens has meaning.. good for you.
Originally posted by riley
Logically though everything that happens is merely the consequence of a previous event.. there is no reason to assume the chance of life occuring is any less likely than anything else in the universe given the right conditions.
Originally posted by Produkt
Just because we lack knowledge for all the underlying principle's of the universe and life itself doesn't mean there was a designer.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
It is good that some in the scientific community strive to improve upon their understanding and don't stay with antiquated ideas, don't you think?
Originally posted by Produkt
The idea of a designer IS antiquated. Goes way back into ancient history, right along side with the belief in a god or gods.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
The likelihood of matter - much less consciousness - springing into being through pure chance in a void of space, WITHOUT an Intelligent Designer of some kind, is astronomically small
Originally posted by Produkt
Based upon what variables?
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
The likelihood of matter - much less consciousness
Originally posted by riley
Bacteria are concious now?
- springing into being through pure chance in a void of space, WITHOUT an Intelligent Designer of some kind, is astronomically small
Originally posted by riley
Astronomically small.. compared to what?
Originally posted by riley
You don't have any data so you have no idea what the 'chances' are.. of course you were insisting it was mathematics before yet you didn't provide the anything to back this up [number of inhospital planets in our universe]. [
Originally posted by riley
Matter and energy are also the same thing [Einstein] so speculating on the likelihood of matter appearing by itself is silly.. they are interchangable.
Originally posted by riley
Wouldn't a 'higher power' qualify as an energy? Think about that before you start saying 'in the begginning'.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Originally posted by riley
How? Your idea is like assuming a truck full of organically freshly picked fruit couldn't possibly have a bug on it.
Sure...but only if there was no insects where the fruit was grown and harvested.
Originally posted by riley
We don't even know if Mars has had life on it.. or europa.
We don't need to know, as we have life here.
Oh...and by the way, they have found evidence of microscopic life on Mars.
I am open to the possibility of more than one Intelligent Designer in more than one Universe; if not now, then in the future.
Think of it as likened to finding a big city that is uninhabited. Just because you can't find the builders does not mean that they didn't exist. Quite the contrary, by all reasonable estimates, either the builders are no longer around or they are not accessible at present. Either way the very existence of a city still points to someone having designed it and built it. Cities do not just suddenly emerge from nothingness.
Alas, you are trying to fit your conception of the energies/forces which existed prior to The Big Bang into your paradigm of scientific understanding and having a very difficult time in doing so. The reason is because your equation cannot explain what happened seconds before The Big Bang was manifested.
That's FRACTAL.
In order to have a REACTION of Creation, there first has to be an ACTION. Actions do not occur spontaneously in a void of space.
They must be directed by a personality, consciousness, or...ahem...a higher power.
Originally posted by riley
Must? this assumption is not logical at all. If you feel more comfortable feeling like everything that happens has meaning.. good for you.
God does not play dice with the Universe. -- Albert Einstein
I side with Albert on this issue.
Bingo.
The "right conditions."
The right conditions for matter and energy - much less life - to emerge do not spring from a void of space without a willful act of an intelligence of some kind.
You could of course prove me wrong on this issue by proving it scientifically. Have something emerge in a void of space without gravity, gases, light, bacteria, sound, or any willful act from you or anyone else.
H-E-L-L-O?
Where do I state that bacteria is conscious?
But it does represent the building blocks of other forms of life, some of which may indeed be conscious.
You are aware that there are different variations of life...right?
Astronomically small when compared to the possibility of matter, energy and life springing into being - in a highly ordered fashion no less.
Still sore from being wrong about the Universe not being infinite I see.
All we need to have is life on one planet to prove that there was an Intelligent Designer. We have it here.
Originally posted by riley
Matter and energy are also the same thing [Einstein] so speculating on the likelihood of matter appearing by itself is silly.. they are interchangable.
Yes, it is quite silly to think that matter and energy - and LIFE - can appear by itself.
In some cases perhaps among the more enlightened scientists but as a whole it doesn't because it cannot be understood through traditional physics and the equations thereof.
Because you can't have matter and energy - much less life - emerge from nothingness without an Intelligent Designer or higher power of some kind.
I suppose that a Universe springing into being through pure chance is your idea of a modern theory?
Based on the logical argument that you can't have matter and energy - much less life - emerge from nothingness without an Intelligent Designer or higher power of some kind having initiated it.
That is why the "Universe just popped into existence" idea falls by the wayside. It doesn't hold up to cold logic.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Originally posted by riley
How? Your idea is like assuming a truck full of organically freshly picked fruit couldn't possibly have a bug on it.
Sure...but only if there was no insects where the fruit was grown and harvested.
Originally posted by riley
Impossible in the natural world.
Originally posted by riley
We don't even know if Mars has had life on it.. or europa.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
We don't need to know, as we have life here.
Oh...and by the way, they have found evidence of microscopic life on Mars.
Originally posted by riley
Indeed. This would suggest that life is not are rare thing in the universe. It's not even rare in our solar system.
I am open to the possibility of more than one Intelligent Designer in more than one Universe; if not now, then in the future.
Originally posted by riley
Where would these intelligent designers live?
Originally posted by riley
Think of it as likened to finding a big city that is uninhabited. Just because you can't find the builders does not mean that they didn't exist. Quite the contrary, by all reasonable estimates, either the builders are no longer around or they are not accessible at present. Either way the very existence of a city still points to someone having designed it and built it. Cities do not just suddenly emerge from nothingness.
Originally posted by riley
Buildings and life forms are not the same thing.. I understand the reasoning but it is exactly the limitations of the human mind that some think things must have a creator as everything we create [aside from life] has to be thought up. Nature does not need to rationalise things like we do.. the fact that some think they have to personify nature just shows how self involved as a species we really are.
Originally posted by riley
Alas, you are trying to fit your conception of the energies/forces which existed prior to The Big Bang into your paradigm of scientific understanding and having a very difficult time in doing so. The reason is because your equation cannot explain what happened seconds before The Big Bang was manifested.
Originally posted by riley
Give me time.
Originally posted by riley
Obviously they arose from somewhere.. but to assume someone does not make any sense as where would this sentient being reside if not in some form of space? Energy requires it.
That's FRACTAL.
Originally posted by riley
You are diving on typos now? Thats pathetic.
Originally posted by riley
In order to have a REACTION of Creation, there first has to be an ACTION. Actions do not occur spontaneously in a void of space.
Originally posted by riley
'Void' is your opinion. I do not believe in 'nothing'.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
They must be directed by a personality, consciousness, or...ahem...a higher power.
Originally posted by riley
There is no 'must'. That is just your belief.. it is not a scientific fact. I'd also like to know exactly how this personality came into being? You assume everything needs a builder.. by that logic everyone has parents.. including a god.
Originally posted by riley
Must? this assumption is not logical at all. If you feel more comfortable feeling like everything that happens has meaning.. good for you.
God does not play dice with the Universe. -- Albert Einstein
I side with Albert on this issue.
Originally posted by riley
I've seen a fair few Einstein quotes.. many taken out of context. The man was indeed agnostic.. care to actually argue his equations instead of posting quotes that are completely unrelated to the topic?
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
The "right conditions."
The right conditions for matter and energy - much less life - to emerge do not spring from a void of space without a willful act of an intelligence of some kind.
Originally posted by riley
There are millions of gallaxies with millions of suns and billions of planets. The 'chances' are pretty good that some will be alligned in the 'correct' positions to create life.. a rough estimate of the top of my head would be thousands of 'living' planets. The scientists agree with me. I said this before.. others have said this before.. why do you keep ignoring this point and insisting it's rare?
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
You could of course prove me wrong on this issue by proving it scientifically. Have something emerge in a void of space without gravity, gases, light, bacteria, sound, or any willful act from you or anyone else.
Originally posted by riley
That would be dark matter.
Originally posted by riley
...Your continued assertion has been that ALL LIFE needs are creator regardless of conciousness.
Originally posted by riley
Bacteria and other single celled organisms are quite capable of evolving over millions of years into concious beings..
Originally posted by riley
WE most probably evolved from single cell.. along with everything else on this planet. Have you now changed your stance to only 'concious life' needs a 'divine creator' and not bacteria?
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Astronomically small when compared to the possibility of matter, energy and life springing into being - in a highly ordered fashion no less.
Originally posted by riley
EVERYTHING in the universe has a 'highly ordered fashion' from our persective.
Originally posted by riley
Again you fail to back up your claims of what is possible and what is not..
Originally posted by riley
you seem to base you entire argument on how important our existince is within the universe..
Originally posted by riley
as though it was created 'just for us'. Kind of like how the sun revolves around the earth..
Originally posted by riley
I believe in the 'multi-universe' theory.. and it was not the question I asked. I wanted to know about all thes inhospitable planets in need of gods magic touch you seem to know about.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
All we need to have is life on one planet to prove that there was an Intelligent Designer. We have it here.
Originally posted by riley
All that proves is that you believe in god and that life exists on this planet.. it doesn't prove god exists.
Originally posted by riley
Matter and energy are also the same thing [Einstein] so speculating on the likelihood of matter appearing by itself is silly.. they are interchangable.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Yes, it is quite silly to think that matter and energy - and LIFE - can appear by itself.
Originally posted by riley
You avoided the question by trying to deflect it.. and I notice you use capitals to highlight 'life' because for some reason you consider it more significant than other chemical reactions or processes.
Originally posted by riley
Even though I am glad to be alive.. it's impressiveness does not make us more 'special' in relation to the rest of the universe.. and I do not think the big bang hapened by itself.. it was a reaction to something preceeding it.
Originally posted by riley
Do you believe clouds make a concious decision to rain? Do planets and moons decide to move rather than just being in an orbit? Does Haileys' comet does a flyby every seventy odd years for the attention? You seem to 'need' things to be 'god's will' that is fine but it is not proven scientific fact.
Originally posted by riley
In some cases perhaps among the more enlightened scientists but as a whole it doesn't because it cannot be understood through traditional physics and the equations thereof.
Originally posted by riley
So just in case it doesn't exist and is therefore undetectable.. you can always turn around and say it's the fault of the testing methods. Convenient.
Because you cannot have something come about from nothing. That is not just a belief, it is a fact. Show us evidence that something can pop into existence in the vacuum of space. You cannot. No one can.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
Because you can't have matter and energy - much less life - emerge from nothingness without an Intelligent Designer or higher power of some kind.
Originally posted by Produkt
No... No it doesn't. That's assuming you KNOW what the condition's were prior to the birth of the universe. Which you DON'T. So, no, lack of that knowledge in no way suggest's a designer.
Originally posted by Paul_Richard
I suppose that a Universe springing into being through pure chance is your idea of a modern theory?
Originally posted by Produkt
The current theories are modern. Can you find any refrence's to quantum physics or M-Teory or string theory 6,000 years ago? Yea ... thought so.
Originally posted by Produkt
Based on the logical argument that you can't have matter and energy - much less life - emerge from nothingness without an Intelligent Designer or higher power of some kind having initiated it.
Originally posted by Produkt
Again, flawed logic. We do not know the conditions of what ever predated the universe, so in no way can we logicly conclude that it was a designer. Lack of knowledge is not evidence of design.
Originally posted by Produkt
That is why the "Universe just popped into existence" idea falls by the wayside. It doesn't hold up to cold logic.
Originally posted by Produkt
It would do you a world of wonder to read up on current theories. Else you wouldn't be saying this.
Originally posted by Produkt
Because you cannot have something come about from nothing. That is not just a belief, it is a fact. Show us evidence that something can pop into existence in the vacuum of space. You cannot. No one can.
Then where did the designer/god come from?
Because you cannot have something come about from nothing. That is not just a belief, it is a fact. Show us evidence that something can pop into existence in the vacuum of space. You cannot. No one can.
One does not have to know the prior conditions of something to know that someone started a project. However, what one does require is the capability to apply deductive and inductive reasoning
Can you prove that the Universe sprang from nothingness and that we all evolved from single-celled organisms?
Well...for those of us who know how to think correctly, we can reason that there was an Intelligent Designer.
Originally posted by truthseeka
Paul,
Do you not see the flaw in your logic?
Originally posted by truthseeka
Let me ask you; where did the designer/higher power come from?
Originally posted by truthseeka
You've been harping about how matter and energy can't come from nothing, so, what about the designer?
Originally posted by truthseeka
And, it is not as valid a theory as evolution.
Originally posted by truthseeka
What is the process through which the designer designs.
Originally posted by truthseeka
I've been asking the ID supporters this for a minute, but they claim no need to worry about that. Mattison has been carrying on like this, until LeftBehind told him (more eloquently than I did) that we have no idea how to design lifeforms, though we do know how to design things like artifacts. This still has Mattison stumped. It seems he responds better to my beefin posting style.
Originally posted by truthseeka
Well, Paul, maybe YOU will tell me more about the designer or higher power. Since you say higher power, I'm going to assume that this higher power has 2 alteregos...even though we know what happens when we assume...
Originally posted by truthseeka
First, Paul says that the odds against life appearing ANYWHERE ELSE in the universe are astronomically huge. Then, he himself posts a link about evidence for life on Mars. THEN, when riley says that's the point, life could possibly be not so rare even in our solar system, Paul agrees.
Which is it, Paul?
Originally posted by Produkt
Where did the designer/god come from?