 |
|
Topic started on 1-10-2003 @ 02:18 PM by NephraTari
|
anyone else heard of this?
Article Here
What are your thoughts?
I was curious about the comments made on the second layer.
Of course it age and almost everything about it is truly fascinating.
I mean 320 million years?
woof!
[Edited on 1-10-2003 by NephraTari]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2003 @ 02:24 PM by ADVISOR
|
external image
"A find of Bashkir scientists contraries to traditional notions of human history: stone slab which is 120 million years covered with the relief map
of Ural Region."
Very good find. Yet another piece of the grand puzzel, or fabrication of history, in relic form?
"This seems to be impossible. Scientists of Bashkir State University have found indisputable proofs of an ancient highly developed civilization-s
existence."
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2003 @ 06:46 PM by William One Sac
|
I know this has been discussed before, however I am not willing to look any further for the thread, if it even exists on this message board. However,
keep in mind that Pravda, during the cold war, was the USSR's official state disinformation ministry. So like rense.com, while there may be something
true every so often published there, it will always be shed in the shadow of doubt as so much of what they publish is bull #.
[Edited on 10-2-2003 by William One Sac]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2003 @ 09:14 PM by lonedaddy
|
I did hear something or another on the subject several years ago. If I remember, it was stated that just the concept could start an endless
Philosophical Debate. But, I percieve that in the eyes of the Creator, one day is the same as millions of years. When this orb was created and the
first intellect implanted I reason that the Eternal Fire had no plans. With the exception that his seed would be able to keep its innocence. Then when
one of other entities decided to get jealous of the workings, Man ended up with the short end of the stick, because the entity wanted to deliver its
own intellect.
Messages have been delivered by a multitude of Prophets and Disciples, each of his own people and ways. Christ's works, I believe, was to allow man
to regain his innocence. The only cost was to know him. Man sets the parimeters not God. God only asks us to follow ten rules. If that is what you
would call the Creator, Almighty, Great Spirit, or a multitude of other names.(Some I cannot, or should say will not put on paper.)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2003 @ 09:24 PM by smirkley
|
Geological structure of the slab was determined: it cosists of three levels. The base is 14 cm chick, made of the firmest dolomite. The second
level is probably the most interesting, ?made¦ of diopside glas. The technology of its treatement is not known to modern science. Actually, the
picture is marked on this level. While the third level is 2 mm thick and made of calcium porcelain protecting the map from external impact.
This whole article I found very interesting. The paste above, is just a reference I made to the structure of the slab. It is interesting to note the
comments on HOW the slabs became seperated...
Latest investigations of the map bring one sensation after another. Now, the scientists are sure of the map being only a fragment of a big map of
the Earth. According to some hypothesis, there were totally 348 fragments like that. The other fragments could be probably somewhere near there. In
outskirts of Chandar, the scientists took over 400 samples of soil and found out that the whole map had been most likely situated in the gorge of
Sokolinaya Mountain (Falcon Mountain). Though, during the glacial epoch it was tore to pieces. But if the scientists manage to gather the ?mosaic,¦
the map should have an approximate seize of 340 x 340 m. After having studied the archive materials, Chuvyrov ascertained approximate place where four
pieces could be situated: one could lie under one house in Chandar, the other v under the house of merchant Khasanov, the third v under one of the
village baths, the fourth v under the bridge-s pier of the local narrow-gauge railway.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-10-2003 @ 03:39 PM by Byrd
|
Actually, if you look at the map and try to compare it to satellite photos of the Ukrane, feature for feature, you'll go "huh?"
It doesn't match.
That's a fragment of the ancient coastal seabed, as further evidenced by the fossil shell (there's at least one) embedded in it.
I expect any day now for Pravda to come out with news about the "good will tour of Bat Boy"
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-10-2003 @ 07:50 PM by THENEO
|
First of all I doubt it is a map of the creator,
has not the universe been around a lot longer than the time frame this story covers?
I have no doubt in my mind that advanced cultures existed in the distant past that we are yet to learn of. Any major cataclysm of the past could
obliterate most evidence of past cultures or make them difficult to find.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2003 @ 12:27 AM by MidnightDStroyer
|
Originally posted by Byrd
Actually, if you look at the map and try to compare it to satellite photos of the Ukrane, feature for feature, you'll go "huh?" 
Of course it won't match...Haven't you heard of "continental drift" & "long-term erosion"? Are you comparing it to *today's* maps or to maps
extrapolated from continental drift? A map that old (measured in *millions* of years!) should match the continental shape & positioning during the
*time it was made*, though...Have there been any investigations on comparing the map to ancient continent-patterns yet?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2003 @ 01:40 PM by Byrd
|
At the "time it was made", the Urals had been around for awhile. These are old mountains and to suggest that they wandered or changed is like
suggesting that the Appliacians wandered from, say, Kansas to Kentucky and rearranged themselves on the way. They were formed at the same time as the
Appliacians (Permian era), in fact.
You'll notice that nowhere is an actual geologic map of the Urals with the mountains identified so that you can comapre it to the stone slab.
Here's a real (current) geological map of the area:
sbmg.geol.msu.ru...
(slow loading)
Notice that one of the dead giveaways for that "creator's map" is that there's no central core of higher "mountains" and that they're all the
same size and that there's just too many "peaks" to be accurate.
A real map would look something like a relief map of our current Rockies or Cascade mountains.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |