It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mister_Narc
Next.
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
But, your answers are pretty sketchy.
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
Some of the witnesses are "fabricated accounts"
The hundreds of witnesses...only one is a potential whistleblower (and of course HE is 100% believable but all the rest are not)
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
The missile or no missile has no explaination why it was not seen
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
There is one anomaly granted, with the plane scheduling (like paperwork is always 100% especially on a day of madness)
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZoranderThe poles were "pre-bent" and fabricated and the carried into place...which nobody saw (love that one)
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
Traffic jams faked
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
The people all around the Pentagon (hundreds of them) are all plants
The emergency crews too it seems were plants
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
And finally the write off of the idea...why wouldn't they just use a real plane.
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
Of course the agenda being pushed is "I've proven it...next", which is far from the case. "Next" doesn't even cover the huge stretch of imagination it takes to believe every person around the Pentagon was a plant.
Originally posted by billybob
...people DID report the SOUND of a missile, and the SMELL of cordite.
you don't have a very big imagination, do you?
Originally posted by Mister_Narc
Russell Pickering:
The aircraft struck 5 metal lamp poles on the way into the Pentagon. My best guess from relative comparisons in the area is that these were 25 foot poles with a 6 foot mast arm. The VDOT poles had what are referred to as the "T" style base. The "T" style base 25 foot pole with a 6 foot mast arm weighs 293 pounds (30'-357 lbs., 35'-398 lbs., 40'-492 lbs.). The industry standard shaft is high-strength steel with a minimum yield strength of 50,000 PSI; ultimate tensile strength of 70,000 PSI. The following link is worth looking at to see the illustrations and specs. Light Pole Manufacturer.
DESCRIPTION: The following two photos show the damage birds did to an AA Boeing 767. The top one is the right wing leading edge and the bottom one is near the root of the left wing (note the displacement of the panel). A bird is a 1-2 pound free-flying object, not a metal 25 foot, 293 pound lamp post attached to the ground.
Originally posted by Fiverz
Interesting stuff, but in no way does it dismiss the possibility that the pole could have caused damage to only the windshield. Scroll up to my post with the pictures of car accidents ... a minivan (which weighs significantly more than a pole) is in the windshield of a Modena without having damaged the hood or side fenders. If anything your post shows that no one can really determine what will happen in situations of extreme force unless they replicate them exactly.
Originally posted by Fiverz
STILL looking for an explanation of a lack of traffic ... no one seems to have an answer for this.
Originally posted by Mister_Narc
Russell Pickering:
The aircraft struck 5 metal lamp poles on the way into the Pentagon. My best guess from relative comparisons in the area is that these were 25 foot poles with a 6 foot mast arm. The VDOT poles had what are referred to as the "T" style base. The "T" style base 25 foot pole with a 6 foot mast arm weighs 293 pounds (30'-357 lbs., 35'-398 lbs., 40'-492 lbs.). The industry standard shaft is high-strength steel with a minimum yield strength of 50,000 PSI; ultimate tensile strength of 70,000 PSI. The following link is worth looking at to see the illustrations and specs. Light Pole Manufacturer.
Originally posted by billybob
Originally posted by Fiverz
Interesting stuff, but in no way does it dismiss the possibility that the pole could have caused damage to only the windshield. Scroll up to my post with the pictures of car accidents ... a minivan (which weighs significantly more than a pole) is in the windshield of a Modena without having damaged the hood or side fenders. If anything your post shows that no one can really determine what will happen in situations of extreme force unless they replicate them exactly.
the pole which crushed the van crushed everything that was in it's way. this would be true also of the lightpole. if it broke the windsheild, there should also be a dent AT LEAST on the corner of the hood where the pole would have come to rest. otherewise, what you have is a broken piece of glass supporting some 200 lbs. likely? possible?
Originally posted by Fiverz
STILL looking for an explanation of a lack of traffic ... no one seems to have an answer for this.
traffic access was obviously blocked to that stretch of highway, otherwise there WOULD be other cars trying to go around the 'wreck'.
there was nothing wrong with that car except a briken windshield. there was NO REASON for this guy to, a. walk home, or b. be out of work. the story STINKS of a BIG FAT LIE, and i would like to give a big shout out to my homey, nister narc for bringing up this important 'case of the FAKED EVIDENCE'.
p.s. the poles could have been knocked down with thermite, lol.
Originally posted by Fiverz
As far as the traffic thing goes, I don't mean after the accident. Most of the eyewitness accounts stated that they were stuck in traffic when the plane flew over. You would think that there would be pictures of fender benders and cars bumper-to-bumper due to a huge plane flying into the pentagon. Think about a gaper's delay when a cop has someone pulled over on the interstate in moderate traffic. But in all the pictures I've seen so far, cars are spread out much further (in fact in the taxi pic there isn't even another car in the frame). I just find that very strange for a supposed "traffic jam". Not saying that one can build a conspiracy theory around it, but no one has been able to come up with a good explanation for that yet.
I took these pictures less then 1 minutes after I watched the american airlines 757 airplane crash into the pentagon on september 11 2001. I left shortly after the picture were taken in fear of further attacks.
www.criticalthrash.com...
Originally posted by AgentSmith
Originally posted by Fiverz
As far as the traffic thing goes, I don't mean after the accident. Most of the eyewitness accounts stated that they were stuck in traffic when the plane flew over. You would think that there would be pictures of fender benders and cars bumper-to-bumper due to a huge plane flying into the pentagon. Think about a gaper's delay when a cop has someone pulled over on the interstate in moderate traffic. But in all the pictures I've seen so far, cars are spread out much further (in fact in the taxi pic there isn't even another car in the frame). I just find that very strange for a supposed "traffic jam". Not saying that one can build a conspiracy theory around it, but no one has been able to come up with a good explanation for that yet.
Do you mean lots of traffice like the pictures below from just after the attack? I don't see why there should be any crashes though as the traffic may have been stationary, so you'd have to be pretty stupid to floor the accelerator to go sailing into the car in front.
It's also worth noting what the photographer says on his site:
I took these pictures less then 1 minutes after I watched the american airlines 757 airplane crash into the pentagon on september 11 2001. I left shortly after the picture were taken in fear of further attacks.
www.criticalthrash.com...
I imagine many others will have done the same.
Originally posted by billybob
'if' the conspiracy 'theory' is true, then the government big brother machine could EASILY pull this off. i just watched 'enemy of the state', last night. everyone should watch it.
Originally posted by billybob
there was NO REASON for this guy to, a. walk home
Originally posted by Fiverz
Interesting stuff, but in no way does it dismiss the possibility that the pole could have caused damage to only the windshield. Scroll up to my post with the pictures of car accidents ... a minivan (which weighs significantly more than a pole) is in the windshield of a Modena without having damaged the hood or side fenders.
If anything your post shows that no one can really determine what will happen in situations of extreme force unless they replicate them exactly.
STILL looking for an explanation of a lack of traffic ... no one seems to have an answer for this.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
The base of the luminaire (lamp pole) is specifically designed to break away when struck.
safety.fhwa.dot.gov...
This is a federal highway regulation.
If the base will break away when struck down low by a car moving less than 100 mph, how fast will the base break away when the top is struck at over 300 mph?
How does that old saying go? "give me a lever long enough and a place to stand, and I will move the earth."
Does Russell Pickering know this?
Originally posted by Merc_the_Perp
This:
Is CLOSE to being represented here:
From here:
eric.bart.free.fr...
But is better represented here:
photobucket.com...
Which contradicts this:
...the cameraman would be behind the stone wall and the bushes.