It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AgentSmith
The arc is consistant with the pole being dragged or pushed, but even in the account it says they moved it. One would also imagine people at the scene would instinctively try and push it out of the path of the traffic.
The fact there is an arc suggests that when it was moved there was not enough man power to lift the object, which there would have had to have been to plant it.
Maybe you would like to tell us in what way this arc is proof of some conspiracy?
Oh just wondering, if these light poles were planted - then what happened to the ones we assume would still be standing in the repective places these ones were supposed to come from?
Originally posted by Grimm
Originally posted by ANOK
I think we're being lied to.
Yes you are. And most of the lies are coming from the "9/11 Truth Movement".
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Merc/Narc/Perp/Lyet and their buddge Joe Quinn are disinformation agents for an organized effort to discredit serious research into 9/11 conspiracy issues.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
If the taxi was moving when the pole hit it, and it took a few seconds for the driver to stop, would the pole have dragged? Given the resting position of the cab, I would assume that the car skidded a bit.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Not nessessarily. if the end of the pole was embedded in the windshield it might not have contacted the hood at all until they pulled it off.
Originally posted by Grimm
Originally posted by ANOK
I think we're being lied to.
Yes you are. And most of the lies are coming from the "9/11 Truth Movement".
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Merc/Narc/Perp/Lyet and their buddge Joe Quinn are disinformation agents for an organized effort to discredit serious research into 9/11 conspiracy issues.
Originally posted by Mister_Narc
God that is such a scumbag move.
What is your problem, homie?
Why are you lying? Why are you making up crap?
You have no proof of this. And you are incredibly wrong.
Knock this stuff off.
You should be penalized for this.
As a matter of fact. If you don't knock this junk off I am going to report it to the admin.
Originally posted by Mister_Narc
God that is such a scumbag move.
Originally posted by Grimm
Let me do it again since it is clear you didn't read the research and evidence from top 9/11 Truth Movement Analysts who are convinced that The No-757 Theory Is Actually Coordinated Disinformation!.
Maybe you should read their work. It's very well-done.
Theodore John Kaczynski, Ph.D. (born May 22, 1942), also known as the Unabomber, is an American mathematician convicted of murder for sending mail bombs to various people over almost eighteen years, killing three and wounding 29. He justified his crimes as a fight against the evils of technological progress. He was the target of the FBI's most expensive manhunt in history.
Before his identity was known, the FBI referred to him as the UNABOM (from "university and airline bomber"). Variants of the code name appeared when the media started using the codename, including Unabomer, Unibomber, and Unabomber.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Jack Tripper
Good detective work Agent smith!
I'll bet Merc never thought anybody would figure that one out!
I decided to use the ATS preferred method of communication (sarcasm) on this post since it's quite obvious that folks like Agent smith don't have a full grasp on the concept of irony.
Originally posted by Jack Tripper
You are delusional.
That is one of the most recognizable "terrorist" images in America.
It's quite laughable that you would actually think that Merc was sending secret messages to "those in the know".
And what's even more funny is that YOU thought you were actually exposing something or that Merc would rush to take that picture off his avatar as a result of your extremely detailed and heavily researched post.
Hey; at least you found an important issue to make yourself useful!
Originally posted by AgentSmith
Detailed? Researched? What about 5 minutes...
You can try and laugh it off as much as you like, your swift defensive response to your comrade says it all. It can hardly be seen as a ironic joke, in your friend's case that would be an image of the President, or some sort of Government symbol maybe, but anyone who bothers to spend time researching his (and your) posts on the Internet will see a lot of common traits. You might think your smart with your quick denial tactics but it can be easily seen as reinforcing the information already available just from your reaction.
I am just ensuring an accurate record is kept if anyone comes across it when carrying out their own research some time in the future.