The $30,000 UFO pic. (possibly the best daylight pic)

I think the most important thing this thread can contribute is to open our eyes to the topic of perspective concerning UFO's. I looked at the pic from the original post and believed it was a aircraft, UFO or otherwise, Then as soon i as i read the next post and saw someone had said it was a seagull, i totally saw it. Might this be able to help us out in other UFO pics. I mean, if you knew what it was, you might see it as that, be it a balloon, known aircraft or whatever.

That seagull would be quite suprised to find out he is transporting an alien invasion force. But not as suprised as the invasion force when they find themselves splattered on a windscreen.

Vulcans don't have "Birds of Prey", thats Klingons.... Vulcans fly ships like the T'Plana Hath Survey Ship out of First Contact:

external image

Sorry to be picky......

I saw the first reply before I clicked on the link, so I saw the bird immediately. Even though, I can't even make out a UFO from the shape.

That my friends is a genuine crap.

Thanks, you just got me kicked out of the official trekkie club.

Ah well, the picture is still up for grabs.

Love and light,

Wupy

Sorry dude

[edit on 17/12/05 by stumason]

I can't begin to imagine what the owner of that picture was thinking. He HAD to know it would be viewed by a large group of folks who'd see it was a gull. But to carry on and post it any way along with a 30K price tag, well, it assails all common sense.

Ok he has now Replied to my E-mail with

just



"take a closer look..."

LMAO

30k would sure buy a lot of bird food these days. I think this guys whole story is littered with a bunch of suspicion.

Definately a Seagull. The owner of the picture shouldn't get a penny for this pic. People like that really p*** me off.

Here's your UFO:





What was that, it can't be debunked? I just think it has.


[edit on 18-12-2005 by xeroxed88]

Absolutely a seagull. I saw the photo before the original post and as soon as i saw he wanted money for it I bypassed it as real. Remember that if money is involved tread lightly(re:Billy Meier).I live in Florida and sweagulls do have an ability to hover. This threw me when I first moved here since I'm an amateur astronomer and UFO researcher(since the 60's).
This guy deserves no respect.

It's amazing that this guy would ask for $30k. If he really thought he had something why not just put it out there like so many others have.

This is the reason the mainstream takes UFOLOGY so lightly. It's sad really.

We should all know by now that common sense isn't very common
This picture was painfully obvious as some type of bird from the first time I saw it. If someone buys this picture for $30,000 then get out your cameras folks, and start snapping bird shots all day long.

LOL Send him xeroxed88's picture there and say "No, YOU take a closer look, pal!" Send him the url to this thread.

Edit: I see UFO watchdog has already debunked it.

I'm with Grady on this one. I was thinking it was traveling to the right and my mind couldn't see the seagull, but then someone (thank you) said the dark spot was below his wing and I saw it.

And to those who are being so nasty, take a pill. Mellow out. Jesus!



[edit on 19-12-2005 by Benevolent Heretic]

oops wrong thread, sorry:

www.abovetopsecret.com...





[edit on 28-3-2007 by Ambergambler]

There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever that that is a picture of a bird. I can't even believe this picture is still around and mentioned in the same sentence as UFOs...

thats clearly a seagull, who ever purchases that pic is a fOOL

hi all, whether its a seagull or ufo, there is something weird going on, in my post above, a man in dorset, uk in 2004 took a photo of this "seagull" then in 2005 a man in canda takes a photo of exactly the same seagull, now either there are two seagulls who look exactly alike, or two ufo, or someone is having a joke:

www.ufoevidence.org... pic from thred

www.ufoevidence.org... new pic

please have a look, i'd like to see if anyone agrees with me on this

Now that's what I call 'gullability'