It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
When the UN comes in to take back what is theirs who will they blame?
Quite frankly, hell, if there is one, would freeze over first before the UN grew enough balls to go in and take back what is theirs.
Originally posted by gimmefootball400
This would be your battle of Armageddon.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Were the US behind it the rest would go along.
The entire world, other than America, is ready for a solution.
as posted by ArchAngel
When the UN comes in to take back what is theirs who will they blame?
The UN has over 190 member nations, 191 counting the US, that can act in a meaningful way, and to simply point out that the world is waiting on the US is ludicrous, if not down right humorous.
I just dont think it was a good idea giving the jews their own land in the midde of the arab world.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Look at the resolutions concerning Israel and how America votes.
Were it not fro the US veto the SC would long ago have imposed a solution.
Originally posted by wang
I love it how the media projects this thing about israel, like israel is surrounded by these wild arab people awaiting at their gates to ravage israel and all its ideology....
I think people should read up about the start of the state of israel, and through its starting years what it did to get where it was.
Israel has been a terroist state since it came into existence, incading the gaza strip and south lebanon. Why? To spread the zionist state.
If anyone remembers laurence of arabia, end of ww1 when the british were going to give the arab state its own land, for helping the british rebel agaisnt the ottomans. Did the arabs ever see the land? NO Yet who did the british give land to after ww2?
Let me tell you something else, israel hates arabs as much as arabs hate israel. You cant make out that israel is this holier than though good guy, as alot of israels are racist zionists.
I just dont think it was a good idea giving the jews their own land in the midde of the arab world.
Im sure if you grabbed a a large amount of african people and then give them their own land in the middle of china. Then the african people start growing, physicaly and economicly that one day the decide to call their land "New Africa" you dont think that the chinese people will not like this?
I am 100 percent sure they would. Now is it the chinese people fault for getting aggrevated at the pacify take over of thier land? No its the africans people fault for setting up their community with out the respect of its neigbours cultures.
Originally posted by mr conspiracy
I have a suspicion that Pentagon already has a plan to invade Israel.
it can't risk Israeli nukes falling into dumb Arab hands. fanatic miight try to buy or steal them. CIA does not think that nukes are safe enough. security may be not good enough. there is also the danger of someone selling them to millionaire Arab oil baron.
every country in the middle east should give up its nukes.
so many things could go wrong.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
All the UN resolutions "against" Israel that have been passed are under Chapter VI:
Under Chapter Six of the Charter, "Pacific Settlement of Disputes", the Security Council "may investigate any dispute, or any situation which might lead to international friction or give rise to a dispute". The Council may "recommend appropriate procedures or methods of adjustment" if it determines that the situation might endanger international peace and security. These recommendations are not binding on UN members.
Originally posted by crisko
To bad Israel isnt in the "Pacific"
Source
pa·cif·ic ( P ) Pronunciation Key (p-sfk) also pa·cif·i·cal (--kl)
adj.
Tending to diminish or put an end to conflict; appeasing.
Of a peaceful nature; tranquil.
pacific
adj 1: promoting peace; "the result of this pacific policy was that no troops were called up" 2: relating to or bordering the Pacific Ocean; "Pacific islands" [syn: Pacific] 3: disposed to peace or of a peaceful nature; "the pacific temper seeks to settle disputes on grounds of justice rather than by force"; "a quiet and peaceable person"; "in a peaceable and orderly manner" [syn: peaceable] n : the largest ocean in the world [syn: Pacific, Pacific Ocean]
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
I just dont think it was a good idea giving the jews their own land in the midde of the arab world.
Not only that, but the land they claim to be theirs because it says so in their holy book. well the muslim holy book disagrees and by handing the land to the jewish people, the british basically slapped the muslims in the face. Implying their beliefs are just plain wrong.
How does one justify believing one holy book over another.
Seeing how Israel has never been a threat to her neighbors, and since she has those weapons so that she may survive while being surrounded by people who want nothing but her demise, and since she can expect no help from a "world council" (U.N.) that despises her, nit-picking everything about her and ignoring all violations of human decency by her neighbors, I'd have to say, no. We should not try and take her nukes away.
Isn't the Hebrew Bible older than the koran - by a couple thousand years?
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
I just dont think it was a good idea giving the jews their own land in the midde of the arab world.
Not only that, but the land they claim to be theirs because it says so in their holy book. well the muslim holy book disagrees and by handing the land to the jewish people, the british basically slapped the muslims in the face. Implying their beliefs are just plain wrong.
How does one justify believing one holy book over another.
Well, let's see ....
Isn't the Hebrew Bible older than the koran - by a couple thousand years?
And, isn't the Koran based on parts of the Hebrew Bible, at least the cast of characters is the same?
Yes, those are a couple of good places to start in answering your last question.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
mystic war between the 'Chosen Few' and those hateful arabs who want to erase the peace loving israeli state off the map
Originally posted by mr conspiracy
it can't risk Israeli nukes falling into dumb Arab hands.