original by conspiracy theorist
Is that a defense for violating UN Resolutions? Is that a defense for obtaining WMDs and there delivery systems?
In the same way as terrorists reason and explain their acts as a way to retaliate against political, military and economic
If their cause is not justified, then how to justify Israel's WMD?
Berlin Wall is in-human, Israeli Wall is justified?
original by djohnsto77
Therefore you are trying to compare apples and oranges. Israel has never violated, or even been subject to a binding Chapter VII resolution.
Good explanation of Chapters VI & VII.
Who created this difference, USA or UN?
Who decides under which chapter to keep the matter?
A srong evidence of moral impotency of international community, specially USA & UN....
original by gimmefootball400
If the U.S. or the U.N. do not do anything to stop it, Israel will strike Iran first. Israel has given us an ultimatum something to be done about
Iran. If nothing is done about Iran, then Israel is set to strike in or around the month of March.
If this is a fact then where are the writers of Chapter VII?
If this is confirmed and Iran has nukes, then why should not immediately strike Israel....
original by COLe
If we do something they will complain, If we dont do something and Iran nukes someone, They will complain we didnt do anything to stop Iran, Either
way they will complain..
Yours is a new-born civilization......
Had you been mature enough, you would not have meddled into the middle east afairs that are thousands of years old...there would have been more peace
without your presencethere...
But you are crazy, not content with lolly pop and insist and cry for NWO & OIL.........nice play.......
original by Riwka
There is a strong relationship between U.S. and Israel.
For what reason should the U.S. invade Israel?
'Relationship'...USA and Israel.....
.........of an employee and an employer.......! To grab Middle-east resources and land.
original by kojac
...................it would be political and physical suicide for iran to launch a nucleur weapon at Israel. Completely unrealistic. What is more
realistic on the other hand, is the current u.s administration fabricating another "potential threat to national security" in order to keep the war
Very realistic.........believe it or not!
I donot remeber who said:
Unfortunatley, our leaders are not only 'pre-emptive' strike strategists, they are also criminal killers. following my above logic, our leaders can
hire any Iranian CIA operative (willing or brainwashed) using 'jihad' and they can go ahead and place a suitcase nuke in any major american city.
3 years after the ensuing war on Iran, we get to discover that the suitcase nuke was assembled and provided from america and NOT IRAN AFTER ALL.