It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by waroftheworlds
IRAQ cannot even get their own house in order. I doubt they have the capability to overthrow or roll-in and take over the Iranian Government. The don't even have a military right now.
Originally posted by waroftheworldsFurther, you once again support the idea that they are going to use the enriched uranium for WMD and not energy. Your whole first paragraph tries to legitimize why Iranians should have additional WMD. I thought this was for energy?
Originally posted by waroftheworlds
More LIES on your end....
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Muslims just dont have the desire for life like the rest of the world.
We care about our futures.. our kids, or loved ones.
they prey for the day, they are killed and meet allah..
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
nuclear weapons rogue, should be given to countries who dont have a PAST or a HABiT OF chaNTIng DEATH to AMierca, or israel..
I agree, any western country should have the avaliability to nuclear waepons.
Be honest..
Muslims just dont have the desire for life like the rest of the world.
We care about our futures.. our kids, or loved ones.
they prey for the day, they are killed and meet allah..
what more of a terrifying person could that be, when you give them the MEANS to destroy large portions of the planet.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Sep, im glad you can appreciate the world we live in.
Considering pakistan and india very NEARLY did go to nuclear war.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
im not saying all muslim countries are bad..
but im not saying they are all good.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
and there is no way this world needs to give the bad ones that DONT have WMDS.... nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by Agit8dChopWhy give a man who's been in prison, known for assaults.. a gun
should we trust him?
Originally posted by thermopolis
Russia or France can not be trusted to do anything. They were both neck deep into Oil-for-food and were bought off by Saddam prior to the war.
NO country has the right to nuclear anything except the US. Every nuke plant worldwide should be turned over to the US military to be run by US corporations.
Trust NO ONE especially Russia or France!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
SEP, just being they came as CLOSE AS THEY DID in such a RECENT YEAR means something.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
And I requoted my BAD WORDING, i admit i said it wrong but i found a better way to say it. only babies cry over spilt milk
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
and it is happening.
What do you call the sept11 attacks?...
i can see the FANATICAL MUSLIMS that they are raising there fists seconds before they impacted the towre screaming '' allah allah ''
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
I thought you'd be mature enough to understand that i realise its common sense that they have bio and chem weapons, so when i say wmd surely you realised I was meaning nuclear weapons..
but if not ill spell it out
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
IRAN under no circtumstances shoudl be allowed NUCLEAR ARMS.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
THEY ARE TOO FINATICAL, they have attacke the US in beirut, khobar towres, saudi
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
and they are screaming in there streets ' death to israel, death to america '
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
now why the hell would a LOGICAL person argue we SHOULD allow them nukes?
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
and even so why should we even give them the MEANS to create these nukes..
Based on the Russian proposal, which is backed by the European Union, the US and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran would be allowed to convert uranium at home in the Isfahan plant before sending it to Russia for enrichment.
This has been done to prevent any Iranian misuse of the enrichment process for producing atomic weapons material.
However, Vaeidi said Iran had neither received an official proposal from Russia nor an official request to meet with the EU trio.
Iranian nuclear officials have, however, said that the country would be ready to agree to such a proposal.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Its too much of a RISK Allowing these people nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
i dont want to say WHAT IF A facist fundamentalist came to power 'somehow', but that can happen to almost any country. ' heck its happening to the USA now, for the last 6 yrs '
but, will say there is more of a chance, for someone in IRAN to be put in a position high enough to use it, condemming the rest of his country to death..
because, being he is a fundamentalist , he believes that every innocent that dies will be visiting allah, killing the infedels and , being true to there religion.
this is to much of a factor, and thus, they should never be given the chance.
"Just as they have orchestrated attacks against British troops in Basra to pressure Britain to drop its opposition to Iran's nuclear programme, so they are trying to put pressure on Moscow by backing Chechen fighters," said a senior intelligence official.
Originally posted by S1LV3R4D0
I think Iran got caught with its hand in the candy jar.
Russia or France can not be trusted to do anything. They were both neck deep into Oil-for-food and were bought off by Saddam prior to the war.
NO country has the right to nuclear anything except the US. Every nuke plant worldwide should be turned over to the US military to be run by US corporations.
Trust NO ONE especially Russia or France!!!!!!!!!!!
Germany was developing their nuke at the same time as the US, but never dreamed of actually using it on anyone.
Since taking office in August, Ahmadinejad has jettisoned Iran's moderation in foreign policy and pursued a purge in the government, replacing pragmatic veterans with former military commanders and inexperienced religious hard-liners.
The former Tehran mayor's aim is to install a new generation of rulers who will revive the radical fundamentalist goals pursued in the 1980s under the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, father of the 1979 revolution that toppled Iran's pro-Western shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
All pragmatists, including those seeking better ties with the West, have either lost their posts or likely will lose them soon, pushing the government toward an ever more radical stance in the already volatile Middle East and in the international dispute over Iran's nuclear program, which the United States believes is seeking to build weapons.
Ahmadinejad's call last month for Israel to be "wiped off the map" intensified international concerns about his policies. Iran's resumption of uranium conversion angered some nations that have suspicions over whether the Tehran regime is trying to develop nuclear weapons.
Iranian moderates say the president has harmed his country by isolating it internationally, and now Ahmadinejad's friends are lining up against him. He suffered a humiliating defeat last week when his choice for oil minister was rejected for a third time, an unprecedented failure for an Iranian president.
While parliament is dominated by Ahmadinejad's conservative allies, the president's isolationist stance and his failure to consult on Cabinet appointments have annoyed lawmakers. They warn they will not approve any future nominee unless Ahmadinejad first consults parliament.
Pragmatists within the ruling establishment worry that Ahmadinejad's radical agenda has sidelined a cadre of experienced men at home and isolated the country abroad.
Earlier this month, the government announced that 40 ambassadors and senior diplomats, including supporters of better ties with the West, would be fired. Also let go were pragmatists who handled Iran's nuclear negotiations with Europe under Ahmadinejad's reformist predecessor.
Originally posted by thermopolis
NO country has the right to nuclear anything except the US. Every nuke plant worldwide should be turned over to the US military to be run by US corporations.
Trust NO ONE especially Russia or France!!!!!!!!!!!