Evolution Proven False, page 1

Another long and specific response of mine wiped out by an error. Ack!

To make that long response short:

The land bridge between asia and america is alaskan, not atlantic
Cro Magnon man is a homo sapien
Researchers noted that neanderthal and homo sapien co-existed long before anyone was using carbon dating
There are no such things as 'races'
There is no evidence for a catastrophic global war that wiped out neanderthal
There is evidence for 'global warming' after the ice age, and there is similarly clear evidence for the ice sheets having existed

I really think that you need to better familiarize yourself with the evidence for human evolution and what the theories are talking about. Yes, the theory of human evolution is a theory, and thus it could potentially be refuted at any moment. However, its not going to be refuted by someone that isn't studying the actual evidence nor who isn't familiar with its postulates. You've obviously thought about your ideas, but the next step would be to look at the evidence that is out there, and let your ideas stand or fall upon that.

Skin pigmentation varies with the intensity of solar radiation, thus indians in the south, closer to the equator, are far darker than indians in the north, who are further from the equator.

Also, why say that having one population of 'crop magnon' spread out across the planet shouldn't produce all the 'racial' diversity that we see today, but that the one tiny subcontinent of india can have that much diversity???

Yes thats the picture that most religous fundamentalists have a problem with.

If you are merely trying to say that high school text books are really all that accurate, then, congratulations, you've figured something out that many people have yet to figure out. Its an important step. High School text books are notoriously shoddy things for information. They're education devices, and are often years behind the actual scientific information. However, don't think that you can 'throw the baby out with the bathwater', as they say. Text books, on their own, can be inaccurate in amusing ways. That hardly means that the actual theories and ideas and evidences that they are coallating and summarizing and introducing people to are wrong.

That is the only way to explain how homosapien would have got to NA from Africa where we supposedly all came from.

Case in point. There is no text book that claims this. You have misunderstood the information. This is why text books, despite their flaws, are overall good things. They usually try to summarize and clearly present 'epitomes' of the ideas that are out there. If you had paid attention to whatever text book you are using, then you'd've seen that there was no suggestion that there was a land bridge from africa to america across the atlantic.

Between cromagnum and homosapien there should be a big picture of the Earth with a big boom on the Earth representing the Earth being destroyed.

Again, cro magnon is a homo sapiens. There is practically no difference between cro magnons and later populations of homo sapiens. To say that you needed aliens to go from cro magnon (a type of homo sapiens) to infinitessimaly different later populations of homo sapiens, makes no sense.