It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpilledBeans
The three different races ARE on the same land mass. Europe, Africa, and Asia are all connected. I don't think North America and Europe were EVER connected as some scientists say it was connected by an ice bridge. I believe if there was an ice bridge that connected NA and EU it would still be here. Thus, I believe the "Indians" were planted in NA before the Europeans arrived.
I also believe the differences between Asian, African, and Caucasian are too different to be thought so lightly as "representations of their enviroment". You may be able to explain why African and Caucasian have lighter and darker skin because of heat and cold but it still does not explain why the asian are they way they are
or why the Indian had tan skin even though there were Indian living in cold weather with darker skin than a caucasian would have.
Also, I did think this theory out for a long time before I ever posted any information or talked about this idea to any one because the average person would call you crazy for making this claim. After all, I am claiming that we were replanted here as homosapians after the cromag and neander's destruction. The cromag and neander's were the first humans of this planet but the planet was destroyed. Homosapians then appeared out of nowhere.
Yes I am claiming that homosapian was planted here by an ET race after the Earths destruction which destroyed the neander's and cromags.
As many "evolutionists" claim, we evolved on Earth from monkeys.
Charles Darwin's Origin of Species had been met with a firestorm of controversy in reaction to Darwin's theory, largely because it was clear that it implied that human beings were evolved from animals, contradicting the story of Genesis and implying an animal nature
The Origin of Species (full title On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
Originally posted by SpilledBeans
I also believe the differences between Asian, African, and Caucasian are too different to be thought so lightly as "representations of their enviroment".
The cromag and neander's were the first humans of this planet but the planet was destroyed. Homosapians then appeared out of nowhere.
Yes I am claiming that homosapian was planted here by an ET race after the Earths destruction which destroyed the neander's and cromags.
Originally posted by SpilledBeans
As for myself, I find that picture accurate up to the point of cromagnum. Between cromagnum and homosapien there should be a big picture of the Earth with a big boom on the Earth representing the Earth being destroyed.
Then there should be another picture of an ET space craft coming down and planting an evolved form of cromagnum across the Earth.
For what reason the Earth was destroyed in between that stage of evolution IDK. But I do believe it was what happened and I think it will remain a secret untill the ET race that replanted our species comes down and admits it.
The only thing that stops this theory from being true is the IDEA that there was an ice bridge connecting NA and EU a long time ago. That is the only way to explain how homosapien would have got to NA from Africa where we supposedly all came from.
I have read some of Darwins work and I believe it to be accurate. I have also read some of the Dali Lamas work and others who theororize that the Universe is in fact an atom... but that is another discussion for another day.
Yes thats the picture that most religous fundamentalists have a problem with.
That is the only way to explain how homosapien would have got to NA from Africa where we supposedly all came from.
Between cromagnum and homosapien there should be a big picture of the Earth with a big boom on the Earth representing the Earth being destroyed.
Beringia, was a land bridge roughly 1600 km (1000 miles) north to south at its greatest extent, which joined present-day Alaska and eastern Siberia at various times during the ice ages.
Biogeographical evidence can prove this land bridge existed far earlier. Similar dinosaur fossils have been found between Asia and North America. For instance the dinosaur Saurolophus was found in both Mongolia and western North America. Relatives of Troodon, Triceratops, and even Tyrannosaurus rex all came from Asia. Fossils in China prove an invasion of Asian mammals into North America 55 million years ago. 20 million years ago, evidence in North America show an interchange of mammalian species. Some, like the ancient saber-toothed cats, have a reoccuring geographical range: Europe, Africa, Asia, and North America. The only way they could reach the New World is through the Bering land bridge. Had this bridge not existed at that time, the fauna of the world would be very different. For instance horses, dogs , and camels would inhabit only the Americas and nowhere else.
Originally posted by SpilledBeans
You say the Neanderthals were actually still around when the Homo Sapien race came into being. I say that is only if our carbon dating is accurate.
Their are no written records of the Neanderthals interacting with homosapien.
The cromagnum on the other hand has been carbon dated to not exist while homosapien were here. Also they say that the homosapian jumped from cromagnum to what it is today in approximately 1000 years, but they can't explain the huge jump in evolution there.
You have to still remember that even the first idea of our evolution is still just a THEORY!
Can you explain the hand size difference?
The eye size difference between asian and caucasian?
Why was the original Asian race a medium pigment while they are living in cold weather ?
Did the caucasian live in caves? No, they were exposed to sun as well, the white skin is a gene code. Why were the Indians a tan pigment while they lived in the harsh weathers of what is today Canada? There are things that don't match up that many scientists don't try to explain because they can't.
"Carbon dating" is one argument that creationists use, because there were some problems with it when the system was first developed... in 1950. They like to pretend that nobody has ever worked on carbon dating or tried to correct it or has even tested it since then.
you are so correct in that. I guess that maybe why we call that age "Pre-History" since there are no written records of anything only a few cave drawings