Originally posted by spy66
Why is it so hard to find other human remains after 4000 years. If we have been here for more then.... i dont know 30 000 years. Shouldn't we have
found huge populated societies.
If you look at human expansion records we breed like rabbits.
only in the last 5-7,000 years
stabble climate dont cha know, we also have created false enviroments for ourselves where finding food and being chased around by predators isnt an
everday occurance, where we are much much less likley to die from disease and injury, where sanitation lowers the chances of catching said diseases
so populations have massivley expanded as each improvment has allowed for older ages to be attained more kids to be produced and for less of them to
die while still children
Now!!! we use C14 to date fossils.
no we dont!
anyone that uses C14 for fossil ating is a moron no wonder it gives false readings for them
But i bet if they dug up Darwin they would date him back millions of years 
bet you it wont
The C14 method has been proven to be off by a long shot but still they use it. Why to keep a lid on what really is. To save some re writing of
history.
its off by 5-7,000 years at its highest level of testing 60,000 years
the margin for error on anything under 10-15,000 years is neglegable
its well known fact, not hidden secrets, its taken into acount when things are dated so no need to re-evaluate evidence
And dont blame it on the climate or rough standards. There are a lot of black people living in Africa that have worse living standards then
they had back then.
back when? they would have the same living standards if they dont have the advantage of technology, which they do they
also have extra food in the form of food aid and medication
so very different to how it was
mortality rates in africa are still lower then they were a few hundred years, so conditions are better and still improving
[edit on 28/12/08 by noobfun]
