It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
He was against liberating
Iraq
Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL
Our goal wasn’t to liberate Iraq it was about Weapons of Mass ...
Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL
Then why do we let genocide happen all the time in Africa and
never do a dam thing about it?
The should have got his ass for that back in 91.
Galloway challenges the US Senate committee to charge him
The Respected MP George Galloway has thrown down a challenge to the US Senate homeland security committee to charge him with perjury and "I'll see you in court".
It is understood that senior Iraqi members of the deposed regime have made statements to the committee, including Tariq Aziz, Taha Yasin Ramadan, the former vice-president of the country, and Amer Rashid, the former oil minister.
"I've never met Ramadan or Rashid but I do know that they are facing charges which may carry a death sentence. As is Tariq Aziz. He has been held incommunicado for two years - and we know what goes on in US-controlled prisons in Iraq - and we also know from his lawyers that he has been offered a deal to testify," said Galloway.
"On the one hand the US government accuses these men of being homicidal maniacs, on the other they assert that their coerced testimony is utterly trustworthy. Well, let Senator Coleman bring them and his unnamed sources to court in a case against me, and we'll see what the world concludes."
Galloway rejects senate perjury claims
"I am demanding prosecution, I am begging for prosecution," Mr Galloway told Sky News. "I am saying if I have lied under oath in front of the senate, that's a criminal offence. Charge me and I will head for the airport right now and face them down in court as I faced them down in the senate room.
"Because I publicly humiliated this lickspittle senator Norman Coleman - one of [George] Bush's righthand men - in the US senate in May, this sneak revenge attack has been launched over the past 24 hours."
Link
Galloway challenges US senators
The Respect MP ridiculed the senators' claims during a hearing in May.
Galloway vs. The US Senate: Transcript of Statement
Snip~~
I told the world that Iraq, contrary to your claims did not have weapons of mass destruction.
I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to al-Qaeda.
I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to the atrocity on 9/11 2001.
I told the world, contrary to your claims, that the Iraqi people would resist a British and American invasion of their country and that the fall of Baghdad would not be the beginning of the end, but merely the end of the beginning.
Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong and 100,000 people paid with their lives; 1600 of them American soldiers sent to their deaths on a pack of lies; 15,000 of them wounded, many of them disabled forever on a pack of lies.
THE controversial MP George Galloway and one of Scotland's leading companies were last night facing the threat of prosecution after they were named in a devastating United Nations report into the Iraq oil-for-food scandal.
The report identified Mr Galloway as a political beneficiary of the oil-for-food programme and concluded that thousands of pounds from companies involved in oil deals with Saddam Hussein's regime were paid into the Mariam Appeal which Mr Galloway chaired and which funded his anti-sanctions campaigning…..
...By: GETHIN CHAMBERLAIN, KEVIN SCHOFIELD, EDWARD BLACK -- 28-Oct-05
UN accuses Galloway and the Weir Group.
Originally posted by shot messenger
It's obvious that the OSI has it's mind manipulators like skippy hanging around here. That's something that irks me to no end. They interfere in free and open discussion. They get a masters degree in psyc and a job in a dark room...
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
Going off on long winded rants on the morality of the Iraq war when being asked a completely unrelated question isn't impressive.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Exactly. He deflected the topic away from him. He tried to
intimidate by being loud and obnoxious. He's a braying donkey
and I can't wait for when the truth about him is all out in the
open!
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
Going off on long winded rants on the morality of the Iraq war when being asked a completely unrelated question isn't impressive.
Exactly. He deflected the topic away from him. He tried to
intimidate by being loud and obnoxious. He's a braying donkey
and I can't wait for when the truth about him is all out in the
open!
Its interesting that at the time he made the comment that, they really needed evidence of him recieving any money to find him guilty of anything and that they obviously had none or they would have presented it then and there.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
Its interesting that at the time he made the comment that, they really needed evidence of him recieving any money to find him guilty of anything and that they obviously had none or they would have presented it then and there.
That's the thing...They weren't there to try him or present the evidence. They were there to simply ask him questions. He was just going on record. It was not a trial/debate as you seem to think.
It's like when a lawyer indicts someone. It's a one sided case at that point. You don't have both sides, you just have the lawyer showing his evidence.
Anything can look good with nothing to compare it to.
Besides that, he did not answer his questions. The fact that he claimed Saddam didn't have WMD's before the invasion has nothing to do with him stealing money from the Oil for Food program.
Originally posted by AdamJ
The Miriam charities accounts have already been investigated and nothing wrong was found.
He did not suport Saddam Hussain, he has opposed his regime all his life, even at a time when the Americans supported Sadam
The idea he met him 'many' times is false, a deliberate obsfucation, he met him twice only.
My point stands about money, they didnt ask him about any money transfers only accused him of recieving money. Ie: they had no evidence.
Originally posted by cjf
I posted this earlier in the thread which moved the thread-up, read the following link…there is more information coming out now, even after this article.
The full report in the 'oil for food scandal' contains some extremely damning information for Galloway and his wife, of which Imo, the US probably had some foreknowledge.
UN accuses Galloway Weir Group
.
Originally posted by AdamJ
They have mentioned no link between Galloway and the Weir group.
THE controversial MP George Galloway and one of Scotland's leading companies were last night facing the threat of prosecution after they were named in a devastating United Nations report into the Iraq oil-for-food scandal.
Originally posted by cjf
The full report in the 'oil for food scandal' contains some extremely damning information for Galloway and his wife, of which Imo, the US probably had some foreknowledge.
Originally posted by AdamJ
The Miriam charities accounts have already been investigated and nothing wrong was found.
…….
Now the charities finances have been investigated already and no wrong doing was found, so i assume that these document they are getting this info from are wrong or forged.
Originally posted by AdamJ
That hardly constitues enriching himself!
Galloway declared it was not a charity. No wonder: much of its proceeds were spent on his own personal travel costs and on his campaign to lift sanctions on Iraq; but in Zureikat, its chairman, it had a very generous benefactor…..
….Though he has declared that the Mariam Appeal was not a charity, the Charities Commission for England and Wales, which regulates such matters, disagrees. It has the right to regulate whomever it like; and when investigating Mariam last year did not have its accounts. It has now asked for and is being sent documents which the US Senate says proves that a British charity (as defined by the Commissioner) was receiving money from an illegal source. If the Commission agrees, it will pass its findings to the police
Galloway in the Dock
…But the report listed Mr Galloway under "other political beneficiaries". It said that "over 18 million barrels of oil were allocated either directly in the name of George Galloway... or in the name of one of his associates, Fawaz Abdullah Zureikat... to support Mr Galloway's campaign against the sanctions."
It detailed how Mr Zureikat made payments into the Mariam Appeal.
The report noted that the appeal received at least £434,000 from Mr Zureikat. It reported that Iraqi officials identified Mr Zureikat as acting on Mr Galloway's behalf to conduct oil transactions.
It included an allegation that Mr Galloway discussed the workings of oil sales in Baghdad with an oil trader who encouraged the former Glasgow MP to seek an oil allocation, though it noted Mr Galloway had dismissed this as a "cock and bull story".
The 630-page report also provided evidence that Weir Group made $4.5 million of secret payments to Saddam's regime.
UN Accusses Galloway--- Scotsman
Originally posted by AdamJ
Also this is not a new extremely damning allegation, its the same thing as they accused him of in may, recieving payments to his charity.
Originally posted by cjf
It appears the US is now not alone if this is creditable.