HMS Invincible sunk in 1982, page 24

Can you spell "desperation"?

BRISTOL did not leave the UK until late in the war, so how can she be in a photo at the beginning of the war? - Time travel? You'll note she's been joined by a Seawolf modified Leander in that photo (I think its Charbydis, but could be wrong). There were no Seawolf leanders deployed with the initial task force and the admirals were on record as saying how desperate the situation was with only 2 seawolf equipped ships in the initial task force (Broadsword and Brilliant). `How come they didn't mention the seawolf Leander? Because the ships didnt get there till the end. Thats why the photos were taken at the end of the war.

Its actually a wonderful piece of evidence to demolish your insane argument. The picture doesnt show a single escort ship that was in the task force at the start of the war with invincible. How is that possible? Possibly because the phot was taken in about June 1982.

As for the Hermes being in the picture - impossible as Hermes had already sailed for the UK at this point. What you are seeing is a patch of water and the superstructure of a frigate merged together. If Hermes were in the picture then she would be signficantly more visible as there is no way the smoke stack of a few escorts could make her profile disspear. That and the fact that the so called carrier looks nothing like Hermes - maybe because its not a carrier.

To be fair, your total lack of ship knowledge and recognition skills is fairly typcial of argentinians. No wonder you thought you'd sunk a carrier if you can't tell the difference between water and a ship./

As for paying the locals - could you explain how the UK government kept its darkest secret when it handed out lots of money to one of the poorest areas in the UK? Did they say "We want you to be queit and not admit a carrier is missing and by the way here's £5000 for your troubles"? If so then you are insane. There were no payments as no carrier was lost. We're not some third world tinpot dictatorship who abducts people on the streets (unlike Argentina) we have democracy. In democracy secrets leak, it would be impossible to conceal the loss of a carrier in this way.

To date you have claimed that

a) The carrier was sunk
b) The entire crew did not know their ship had been hit and were airlifted off at night in one of the greatest maritime evacuations ever.
c) HMS ILLUSTRIOUS was rushed south to become HMS INVINCIBLE
d) HMS ARK ROYAL was sent to act as a helo platform.
e) A replacement was constructed in total secrecy in the USA in under 2 years.
f) LArge payments were made to over 70,000 people to keep this a secret.

To prove this you have provided the following in evidence:

a) A picture of the ships mast which was painted grey
b) Some random photos of the post war task force which you claim were taken in April
c) Err, thats it.

You have not supplied any photos of the attack, you have not provided any evidence to support your view. You have ignored every question thrown your way as you are unable to answer them.

Your arguments are as pathetic and false as your claim to the Falkland Islands.