It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 55heroes
this photo´s date is the 5/4/82 or the 6/4/82
All the ships are going to Ascension in these photos.
Originally posted by TheIrishDuck
Originally posted by vinciR05
The Invincible was never SUNK in Argentina, She sailed back from the Falklands in 1982 and I was there to see it. She was in tact, and she had been fired at in the WAR! but was never hit. She does still have the number R05 (believe me) and I was only on board six weeks ago. WE built the ship HMS Invincible and I can tell you that there has only been ONE Invincible which is a through-deck Cruiser and one with RO5!
Not sunk Never! and I should know for sure.
L
No way man!!! it was hit!!!!!!
do you want the telephone of the pilots who atacked it?, i can give them to you to ask them.
After it was hit, it sunk.
Originally posted by Jim30
This is just getting stupid. You've been proven to be lying by showing photos that don't apply and your excuse is that they are actually a different date.
Riiight -has it occured to you that you are either
a) confused and lying
b) mentally ill and delusional
c) just wrong
Look no one is going to hold it against you if you admit you were wrong. All you need to do is admit you didn't hit or sink Invincible despite the best efforts of your pilots (who were very brave nonetheless).
If you're so right, produce one piece of solid evidence to show Invincible being hit or on fire. I note that you have so far relied on no evidence at all to make your claim.
Originally posted by TheIrishDuck
The third ship in pic 2 is Invincible not Bristol.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by TheIrishDuck
The third ship in pic 2 is Invincible not Bristol.
And after you are completely annihalated and shown to be a liar, this is the best you can do?
HMS Bristol is clearly visible in both pictures and as stated above, she did not sail for the Falklands with the TF, but arrived late. So your pictures cannot be of the fleet leaving, as she was never there.
Now bugger off.
Originally posted by Jim30
This is just getting stupid. You've been proven to be lying by showing photos that don't apply and your excuse is that they are actually a different date.
Riiight -has it occured to you that you are either
a) confused and lying
b) mentally ill and delusional
c) just wrong
Look no one is going to hold it against you if you admit you were wrong. All you need to do is admit you didn't hit or sink Invincible despite the best efforts of your pilots (who were very brave nonetheless).
If you're so right, produce one piece of solid evidence to show Invincible being hit or on fire. I note that you have so far relied on no evidence at all to make your claim.
Originally posted by 55heroes
No way men!!
The two photos are of 5/4/82
No way
Ward is a lier.
Why?