It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
as posted by Canada_EH
Does anyone have any info with sources with what else is planed to be upgraded in the raptors?
Current planning envisages the introduction of the
GBU-39/40 Small Diameter Bomb in the Block 20
aircraft by 2007, together with high resolution SAR radar
modes, improved radar ECCM, two way voice and data
MIDS/Link-16 capability, improved crew station
software, and improved electronic countermeasures.
The Block 20 configuration is the baseline for the Global
Strike Task Force (GSTF) fleet, and will include JSF
common radar modules, a dedicated high-speed radar
processor, and COTS technology CIP processors.
The Block 30 configuration, planned for 2008-2011,
extends the growth seen in the Block 20. Side-looking
radar arrays are envisaged to provide a significant ISR
capability in the aircraft along with enhancements to
provide full air defence suppression (Wild Weasel) and
time-critical target engagement capabilities. A Satcom
terminal will be added to provide continuous network
connectivity during deep-strike profiles.
The post-2011 Block 40 aircraft is intended to be the
definitive Global Strike configuration, including
incremental enhancements to Block 30 additions, to
provide full sensor networking, range enhancements,
highly integrated ISR capabilities, and a Helmet
Mounted Display similar to the JSF. Longer term
planning for post Block 40 envisages an Electronic
Attack variant, essentially replacing the lost EF-111A
Raven. A stealthy stores pod for JDAM and SDB is also
in development to enable carriage on external pylons.
As a strike aircraft the F/A-22A will have similar internal
payloads to the JSF, but will be vastly more survivable
due to better stealth to evade air defence missile
batteries, plus better speed/altitude performance, more
defensive internally carried air-air missiles and the ability
to kill opposing fighters with no difficulty. The spiral
development program for strike capabilities is
incremental, and primarily involves software and
integration of networking equipment and new weapons.
As a result, it is an affordable proposition. The Block 20
enhancements were covered within the original 2004
production budget.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
Thats so awesome. It connects real well to the discusion going on in the F/B-22 thread. The claim of one the guys there saying that the F-111 could do the bombing role better then the 22. Im sorry but if you have this CNI at your disposial you can pick out the best target when your in mid flight and still have exact bombing ie virtually 100% hits even when changing targets. this is the same for anything in the air. The 22 pilot could see what another pilot is seeing on his radar and change his attack accordingly with out an awacs. I agree this thing gets sweeter and sweeter.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
question Jim wouldn't a 19 year old who got 2 hours of sleep be in deep # for any plane he was working on? and while i agree with your saying that things can go wrong that is also a fact of anyplane.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Originally posted by Canada_EH
question Jim wouldn't a 19 year old who got 2 hours of sleep be in deep # for any plane he was working on? and while i agree with your saying that things can go wrong that is also a fact of anyplane.
I agree but in a combat situation that is the rule not the exception......
What I am concerned about is that we are making these aircraft too complex to be maintained by the squadrons flying them. A military aircraft technician these days is nothing more than a component swapper. That's great if you have a steady supply of good components.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
First off you opening statement i have no problem with. I infact completely agree with you on that subject. In war things have an added pressure im sure of that. You described what you did in peace time now add the fact that the pilots plane your working on has to bring his ass home from a combat situation. No problems with that when it comes to understanding.
But your last part about making the plane to complex? You went on to say that all they (technicians) are is people to swap out components. Those to things seem to tell me to different things. one says over complex the other one say simple.
Wondering if you could clear this up for me thanks.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
Wow thanks man thats really helpful for someone that has had the chance to work in a situation like that. I think that you really do have a point in saying that the tech's that now work on planes arent even mechanics any more really from the sounds of it. I was wondering what you think will happen in the next say 7 years when all of the sudden no one knows how to bend a fuel line like in your example.