It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sight2reality
We to this day cannot fully translate all portions of the bible. Original texts are damged and untranslatable. If you look at direct translations, you will see brackets.
For example:
[steve ran after bob]
Those brackets occur VERY OFTEN!!!!!! Go ahead and look for yourself. They are placed where the interpretor was unable to translate the words due to damage of the paper, or poor understanding of the language.
Whats in the brackets? The interpretors opinion of what he thinks was to be written.
How in the world do you expect to be able to use this bible code? Not to mention that many of the claims of words and phrases derived from this "code" actually come from fully translated english versions of the bible, and not the original text anyway.
When you want to see something.....often times you will. Resulting in things like "bible code".
Definitely don't hesitate further to study the ancient Hebrew language, Dancer~!
Originally posted by dancer
With those ideas/concepts I can surely understand anyone questioning any translation of the Bible. I think the best point could be that there are some things that were without a doubt intended to remain pure and unadulterated - those being the Books of moses - The balance are for to allow one a better relationship with G-d.
Originally posted by marg6043
the book of revelations is a book that always has been taken with mixed
feelings taking in consideration that the author was never prove to be the
one they credited. Revelations was added to the new statement after a
very long consideration.
Originally posted by queenannie38
I appreciate your efforts--however I must tell you that I know about these things, and have researched them in my course of life-time 'God-study'--but they are of no consequence to me as far as matters of truth and scripture.
I don't need any man, no matter how vested by the RCC or any other man-made self-proclaimed agent of God, to tell me what God 'approves' or deems as viable knowledge. I see right through those kind of deceptions, first with my heart and then with opened eyes. I'm not bashing anyone or extolling anyone. I just follow my orders directly: trust God and not in man, not even myself. John 15:26. God sent the Spirit to each of us, He didn't send men with Spirit to guide us. The Spirit is our direct guidance.
Originally posted by queenannie38
I don't need any man, ... to tell me what God 'approves'
or deems as viable knowledge.
I just follow my orders directly: trust God and not in man,
not even myself. John 15:26.
I have absolute confidence in the reliability of the New Testament,
but have no need to rely on others to tell me this, especially religious men
and church fathers.
Originally posted by queenannie38
I don't understand the point you're making?
Are we to actually regard these listed men as in a position of
authority between ourselves and our High Priest?
are you seeing it as I do, then--that the fact they didn't
wholeheartedly welcome the last book of the bible into the canon is pretty
good proof its got some truths which threaten their hijacked so-called
authority?
I'll give that
Without Revelation, Genesis is incomplete
God wrote the bible for you to see Him.
Originally posted by dancer
Among the points missed here is that Jesus NEVER claimed to be G-d, or any part of G-d, merely a Son of G-d, as are we all sons, and daughters of G-d.
Originally posted by dancer
Good! Now we are getting some where...
I maintain that Christ Never claimed to be G-d.
Working on the behalf of G-d - Definately - without question.
Through that which Christ taught, and by being as a primary example of what a good person was Christ brought more people to G-d than anyone since - Is without question.
The examples Cited reflect how their faith was brought to fruition via Christ.
Most currious Selection.......
Here are my interpetations:
Eg. in 25 - Is G-d not your father? - Of Cource he is. And the works that you do do bear witness of you as well.
In 26 - You don't belive in what I teach - because you do not share the same doctorine as I do.
In 27 - Those that hear the message I am speaking know to follow me and I recognise them as my family.
In 28 - Through my teachings they have learned faith in G-d and that faith is so strong they will never falter.
In 29 - G-d (father) is greater than everything (If Christ implied he was G-d this clenches his denial of it - as if he were claiming to be G-d he could not have seperated himself from G-d to say that 'My Father is greater than all" as that would include himself). Due to their faith they are beyond anyones ability to corrupt.
In 30 One in doctorial agreement - eg. My teachings are correct according to the Scriptures.
However - John 10:34 - "Ye are gods" & 10:36 "I am the son of G-d"
Gen - 1:26 Let US make man in our image.
(Who is "US" and "Our" ?)
at the sons of G-d saw the daughters of men - (Other Sons before Christ? - note the plural)
Currious - Have you ever looked at the formation created by the Jews while moving the Arc of the Covenent? - They setup their camp in a very orderly manner - that never changed.