It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who told you that evolution is based on tons of scientific evidence
Originally posted by B1luetooth
there are six different meanings to the term evolution.
first you would have to have:
The first five are purley religious none of those first five have every been proven.
the only one that has been observed is micro evolution. (bad term but it happens) you can get different species within the same kind.
you will never get a monkey from a human or get a human from a monkey. it wont happen.
hey the universe is pretty big, you expect me to believe that all the chemicals evolved the same throughout the entire universe?
The geologic Collumn by which all fossil dating and strata dating is done, was made by charles lylle back before radiometric dating was invented.
by the way radiometric dating is very inaccurate. it is based on many faulty assumptions. if you want more on that, let me know
the scientist on this site proves that the earth was never a hot molten mass. by the way, the earth was never a hot molten mass and this guy proves it.
Polonium Halos do not prove a young earth
The biotite in which Gentry (1986) obtained some of his samples (Fission Mine and Silver Crater locations) was not from granite, but from a calcite dike. The biotite formed metamorphically as minerals in the walls of the dike migrated into the calcite. Biotite from the Faraday Mine came from a granite pegmatite that intruded a paragneiss that formed from highly metamorphosed sediments. Thus, all of the locations Gentry examined show evidence of an extensive history predating the formation of the micas; they show an appearance of age older than the three minutes his polonium halo theory allows. It is possible God created this appearance of age, but that reduces Gentry's argument to the omphalos argument, for which evidence is irrelevant (Wakefield 1998).
See what I believe agrees with many scientifc facts.
I believe in the bible. Genesis 1:1 "In the Beginning, God created the heaven and the earth"
that one verse explains the origin of time/space/matter.
and by the way, not every scientist in the world believes in evolution, they dont go out claiming that they do becuase they will wither get fired, lose their grant money or be forgotten.
Evolution is not an open minded theory, it is a tax funded and carefully protected religion.
if you want for me to explain how evoution is a religion, ill be more that glad.
hey werent called dinosaurs back then, they were called dragons. and if the bible is true like me as well as others believe it to be, that means that dinosaurs were always with man and were created within the same six days.
the only evidences the evolution theory has is a bunch of lies, things that have been proven wrong years ago. for example the first five meanings to the Term evolution.
Creation is a theory just like evolution
however it explains many things about the word today.
if you want ill share some with you
have you been to school? have you been in a biology class?
the textbooks state that it is a fact and not a theory.
and evolution is based on lies. ask any ACLU personnel
they might deny it at first, but if you show them everything in the textbooks that have been proven wrong. they will tell you that; yes all of those things have been proven wrong but there is nothing to replace the theory.
the whole theory looks dumb.
Darwin studied finches and observed 14 varieties of finches.
he then concluded that birds are related to bananas.
darwin only had a degree in theology. thats the only degree he ever got. he was never a scientist.
Originally posted by Shenroon
NOte to ghost-before you post a topic check what your saying.
In evolution there isnt a 'everything came from nothing' there are many theories on how it came a bout scientifically.
Yes the very start of absolutly everything cant be explained yet by evolutionalist(scientists) but creation have the exact same hole where did everything start?
Also can I ask whihc has more sciencific fact? -the bible
And now can i ask for proof of creationalism besides
1.the bible or any other holy book
2.A feeling in your head
3.(dont read this one if you are easily offended) Your cell mate in the insane asylum
Originally posted by Frosty
Besides, how do creationist account for the dinosaurs who roamed the panet 250 million years ago?
Dinosaurs. Every true christian knows that earth was created about 6000 years ago! This is told in the Holy Bible which, as we know, is the Word of God because it is told in it! So dinosaurs were created at that time as well. Bible says, two of all unclean animals were on the ark, so, the remaning (not yet extint) dinosaurs were on the ark. They degenerated faster than other animals and died later.
Originally posted by slank
"And then the Big Magic God waved his magic wand and said 'Abracadabra' and life was created."
Is that your alternative ghost?
Christian bedtime stories can be so sweet.
Originally posted by Kidfinger
, before I get hacked to death for saying God didnt do it, let me just say that I think God DID do it. I look at it like this. Got got bored and started to play with his chemistry set to see what he could come up with.
BUT, the process that life has come from is natural and scientifically explainable. I just think God sent the lightening bolt that started the chemical reaction for life
[edit on 7/11/05 by Kidfinger]
Originally posted by ghost
The Evolutionist get to ignore the obvious flaws in their point of view.
However they insist that the Creationist (like me) prove Every detail of our position.
The last thead I read, the writer didn't even want anyone to point out his flaws in logic! If you all want a Real Scientific discussion, you have to consider all the facts, not just the ones you like!
Now, Creationism explains how and why life exists. It has a beginning point! Evolution doesn't, It starts with the assumption the life was always there. Do we really need to prove what doesn't make sense here?
Any of the brilliant Darwinist care to tell me where the first living Orginism came from?