It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Especially when the CIA quits covering its butt for past errors and coughs up the data linking Iran and al Qaeda.
Or is the Scott Ritter looked up to the same one accused of soliciting an underage girl on the internet?
Originally posted by xmotex
Or is the Scott Ritter looked up to the same one accused of soliciting an underage girl on the internet?
I'm sure that had nothing at all to do with his enemies in Washington
Then there's the last lie of Scott Ritter: He's been setup by the Bush Administration to "shut him up." Ritter's claims of a "setup" and the timeline of events surrounding his being sexually compromised in Russia and Iraq, and his subsequent arrests for soliciting sex with under-age girls simply don't justify each other. Ritter's own arrests for soliciting sex with two minor girls occurred in April, and again in June of 2001. The court records of these events were sealed until last week when the FBI obtained a court order un-sealing them to pursue their own charges against Ritter. Ritter himself began speaking out against the War in Iraq and against the Bush Administration specifically in mid to late 2002. Does Ritter intend for us to believe that the Bush Administration "arranged" his arrests in 2001 for soliciting minors for under-age sex?
Scott Ritter
As far as internicine warfare between differing elements of Islamic believers is concerned there exist many instances throughout history of "enemy of my enemy is my friend, friend of my enemy is my enemy" situations to pick from.
Originally posted by Interseptor
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Or, ECK, another way of looking at it is that Iran has been monkeying around in the region's affairs by supporting terror for decades. They are flaming death in Iraq, along with Syria, and support those who wish to kill the children of Israel, again, along with Syria.
It is much easier to say that we just might finally get around to taking the War on Terror to the most active terrorist sponsors, now.
Arent the Jews who live in Israel actually European Jews for more then a thousand years so that doesnt make them Childern of Israel and by the way for your information the real originals Jews who lived in Middle East live in with the plestines and syrians and jordan, labonon, egypt they dont want to live the Israelis because they are Darwinist and that they have missused the name of Israel in there terms it is stolen.
Despite not being these people's biggest fans, some of us think it's a stupid idea to go around attacking countries that have not attacked us.
Originally posted by SiberianTiger
If you think both Rus/US don't know that already then you need to think again, if Rus was gonna give Iran Nuke they would just ship/Rail car or fly a a Nuke missile in for them, no one will find out, but the chances of some one finding out about it if Rus builds a Nuke Power plant for Nuke weapons perpuses is much greater, so I assure those plants ARE for peacful power reasons.
Can you please explain why you don't consider the numerous terror attacks financed, planned and carried out by Iranian agents against American targets to be an attack on our nation?
Is the invasion, and subsequent hostage taking of our embassy staff (which is sovereign US territory, btw) not an attack on our nation?
Do you not realize that Iran is responsible for the deaths of American troops, via insurgent (Iranian agent) attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan?
But that's just an assumption on my part!
as posted by xmotex
And don't give me Khobar Towers - that attack was planned and commited by Wahabbi Saudi's & one Lebanese, not Iranians... at least if you believe the US government.
Missed a key word in your above equation: who funded them?
The commission's report provides new details of Iranian government support for al Qaeda, including travel assistance to several of the hijackers involved in the 2001 airline attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.
U.S. intelligence officials have said that a senior al Qaeda operations official, Sayf al-Adl, has been in Iran since 2002. He has been linked to the terrorist attacks in Saudi Arabia in May, and to the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa.
The commission inquiry revealed that captured al Qaeda leaders Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Ramzi Binalshibh disclosed to interrogators that at least eight of the September 11 hijackers "transited Iran" on the way to Afghanistan, "taking advantage of the Iranian practice of not stamping Saudi passports," the nearly 600-page report stated.
Washington Times
A former Iranian-government intelligence officer who has defected to the West tells Insight during telephone interviews from Germany that he personally informed the FBI at the beginning of September of a plot by Iran to crash civilian jumbo jets into the World Trade Center and government buildings in Washington. A key element of the plot, which was code-named Shaitan der artash (Devil in the Fire), was the use of Arab "muscle men" to hijack the airliners. "Only the men leading the cells were Iranians," he says, "and they were recruited from among Iran's Arab-speaking population" in the southwest province of Khouzistan, bordering Iraq.
The other members of the cells were recruited under a variety of "false flags," the officer says. In the earliest version of the plot, hatched in 1988 in response to the accidental downing of an Iranian Airbus by the USS Vincennes in the Persian Gulf, the Arab recruits were told that they were hijacking U.S. airliners, not crashing them, and would fly to Cyprus and on to Baghdad "where they would be greeted as heroes."
The former intelligence officer says he received a coded message from inside Iran one week before the Sept. 11 attacks, signaling that the Shaitan der artash plan had been reactivated. He says he contacted the German intelligence agency, the BND, and the legal attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Berlin. U.S. government officials tell Insight that the FBI now claims it didn't receive the defector's warning until after Sept. 11.
Iranian defectors and U.S. counterintelligence officials have been warning for years of Iran's increasing preference to use Arabs and other non-Iranian Muslims for terrorist operations. "It provides them deniability," a U.S. investigator tells Insight. "If you are the government of Iran, you don't want to leave fingerprints that could tie you to these attacks. Unlike bin Laden, you've got real assets that can be targeted and destroyed. The United States has an excellent track record of attacking such targets, so any regime that openly engaged in anti-U.S. terrorism would have to be motivated by an extraordinary urge to self-destruction. Not likely."
Insight Magazine
Originally posted by Seekerof
Of course you "trust" John Ritter, ECK.
Hey! Think you can trust me since I served in the Gulf War as a Pararescueman when I make assertions as he?
I mean, did you not say you trust the man because he served in the Gulf War?!
Regardless, beyond me how some can still believe an Al-Jazeera columnist,
especially since he predicted an invasion/bombing of Iran in June of this year, which did NOT happen, and then to cover his rear, he then comes out saying that, "Oh, btw, though I will not admit that I was in error because I was talking out my rear, the war against Iran has already began."
Yes, please keep swallowing that bait dished by what you deem is "a man I trust"......:shk:
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Originally posted by Interseptor
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Or, ECK, another way of looking at it is that Iran has been monkeying around in the region's affairs by supporting terror for decades. They are flaming death in Iraq, along with Syria, and support those who wish to kill the children of Israel, again, along with Syria.
It is much easier to say that we just might finally get around to taking the War on Terror to the most active terrorist sponsors, now.
Arent the Jews who live in Israel actually European Jews for more then a thousand years so that doesnt make them Childern of Israel and by the way for your information the real originals Jews who lived in Middle East live in with the plestines and syrians and jordan, labonon, egypt they dont want to live the Israelis because they are Darwinist and that they have missused the name of Israel in there terms it is stolen.
Uh, as the Jews were scattered to the four winds, and as they are now being brought back to Israel from where the four winds took them, I'd not want to be the one to insult God's Chosen. They understand that, why is it that you can't? It was the "European" Jews who rescued the "Ethiopian" Jews in a miraculous airlift. They don't worry with the differences in looks after a few thousand years, why should I? Or you?
Or, you may wish to entertain the anti-semitic crap about the ones (Which ones? They are even coming out of Russia, now. That is an important prophesy coming to be. Not all of them will leave Russia, and they will suffer greatly for that mistake.) in Israel today are not real Jews, but evil folks trying to take over the world stuff. Personally, I won't, as there is no evidence that they as such. They merely wish to hold onto their little country.
As far as not wishing to make a preemptive strike against Iran, I think it is a bit late to talk "preemptive". They are one of the countries who have been working against us for quite some time. They are firm supporters of the terrorists, and have been for years. They are not merely a "threat", but have been actively seeking to do us harm, through the terror networks.
Were we to attack, say, France, that would be a preemptive strike against a potential threat!
What, do you think that these nations who hate us are going to come out and say, "We, the sovereign nation of Humpty-Squat, do hereby declare war on the U.S. and/or Israel, and will, at this time, do battle against you in accordance with your Geneva Convention outlook on the concept of war!"?
[edit on 5-7-2005 by Thomas Crowne]
xmotex theres your support for a terror strike within the past ten years.