It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ulshadow
chinawhite-
everybody said china steal tech... lol and i am chinese american, born in china too... but don't worry i am not brainwashed lol
Right now, i said at most china will be able to sink one US carrier battle group maybe a second carrier battle group if luckly... or either we have a horrible general in command...
also, F/A-22's (said about 100 of it) is a good enough interceptor to take care all of china's fighters...
and china have a higher spending than 30 billion... and most of china's sub is crap except the 3 kilos that your buy from russia...
Originally posted by horten229v3
Once again American intelligence, better equipment, and better trained airforce and navy personell would allow them to win a battle with China close to the shore, but of course not without losses but i doubt it would be as severe as previously stated. Also he forgot to mention the us Subs that would probably be in the area. And if there was a US sub in the area then the US would win the sub war and the aircraft carriers and destroyers could focus on the air and naval battle. Also with the US sub there it would greatly diminish the Chinese forces on the water (like destroyers and aircraft carriers).
Originally posted by chinawhite
American intelligence.?? aka iraq
china also has satelites that can keep close range on the battle field. american fighters might have better tech/training but close to chinese soil with 35-39 chinese airbases packed with fighters ready to die for there country.
i haven't even counted chinas real streenghts. land-based anti-ship missiles.
last time i checked china has hundreds of patrol boats and other larger vessels.
also chinese land-based sam sites would also be used.