From the other, closed thread...
1. False company name. There is no DNI (officially), Dept. Naval Intelligence. The official name is ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence). Now of
course, the name could just be a front, who knows, but still a sticky point.
Are you familiar with the "black ops" world? I didn't think so. There are lots of (Unofficial) departments which use (Unofficial) names.
Actually, I am a little familiar with it.

And yes, there are lots of front departments with similar names. As you can see, I stated that it's
possible it's a front. (though using EG&G would have been the logical choice for keeping a secret).
2. If contracted, most likely his form would be from EG&G, not the military or any agency thereof.
Not if what they hired him for was above top secret. Things in the "black ops" world are done to conceal which means shifting departments/agencies.
If he got his contract through EG&G, that doesn't mean they couldn't have easily erased all his records.
What would that have to do with his school records? Also, he was either hastily given SCI Top Secret Clearance, or he already had it. Chances are,
if at Los Alamos as he claimed (and as supported by the phone directory), then he would have had such clearance already. I'll agree that SOMEONE
obviously tried to erase some things, and that's why I just can't dismiss the guy, but still a lot of iffy stuff.... I just find it hard to believe
that all records of such clearance and employment with it were eradicated, though I suppose anything is possible.
3. If an independent contractor, he'd have an I-99, not a W-2 for such work.
Not true for "black ops"
You're right there. He likely wouldn't have had taxes, he would have been paid cash or wire transfer and not reported to Uncle Sam or oversight
committees. Employed by a bogus company would have been another route, but with a MAJ coding? Who knows, maybe they're fans of inside
jokes....
4. For his W-2 to come from this company/agency, he'd have had to have been a legitimate employee (i.e. not contractor).
Not true for "black ops"
See above.
As I've said though, I haven't completely dismissed him. I think there is SOMETHING to his claims, it's just very difficult to separate the wheat
from the chaff with this man...and there's a lot of chaff....
[edit on 25-4-2005 by Gazrok]