It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stevieray
a reply to: Ectoplasm8
When your “more logical” debunking story contains toy makers building sensitive military equipment, random ‘leftover’ Chinese tape, senior military officers who can’t recognize Chinese writing, the obligatory overzealous reporter, standard dig at Stanton Friedman …… the story may be more convoluted than the UFO version.
originally posted by: billxam
originally posted by: crayzeed
4. The biggest one, Jesse Marcel was the bases intelligence officer (they don't make people intelligence officers because they're stupid) he would have known what a balloon and it's array were. Apart from the official line at the time Marcel would have followed orders to cover the false story and later in life he came out and told the truth.
So we're supposed to believe that Marcel was so stupid that he thought a UFO had crashed and wasn't able to see it was a balloon. If that's the case then we were very, very fortunate that those idiots back then didn't blow us all to kingdom come. Or was the official story the real one? Or was it the first one? And if it was a top secret device why oh why would they bring truckloads of enlisted to scour the desert for scraps and not use someone with a little more security clearance to pick up the pieces?
Every bit of information about the subject is suspect at this point.
... I was met at the General's office by a Lt. Col. or Col. who told me that some one had found a flying saucer in New Mexico and they had it in the General's Office. And that a flight had been set up to send it to Wright Patterson AFB, OH., but the General suspicioned that it might be meteorological equipment or something of that nature and wanted it examined by qualified meteorological personnel.
The Col. and I walked into the General's office where this supposed flying saucer was lying all over the floor. As soon as I saw it, I giggled and asked if that was the flying saucer. I was told it was.
Several people were in the room when I went in, among them, General Ramey, a couple of press people, a Major, I learned to be Major Marcel and some other folks. Some introduced Major Marcel as the person who found this material.
I told them that this was a balloon and a RAWIN. I believed this because I had seen many of these before... The balloon was made out of a rubber type expandable material and when launched was about six to eight feet across. When the balloons got to altitude they expanded to twenty feet or more, the target was used for radar reflections and I believe each leg of the target was approximately 48 inches. It resembled a child's Jack (like a child's ball and jacks set) with a metallic material between the legs. The legs were made of material appearing to be like balsa wood kite sticks but much tougher.
While I was examining the debris, Major Marcel was picking up pieces of the target sticks and trying to convince me that some notations on the sticks were alien writings. There were figures on the sticks lavender or pink in color, appeared to be weather faded markings with no rhyme or reason. He did not convince me these were alien writings.
I was convinced at the time that this was a balloon with a RAWIN target and remain convinced.
I remember hearing the General tell someone to cancel the flight, the flight to Wright Patterson.
While in the office several pictures were taken of Major Marcel, General Ramey, myself and others.
I was dismissed and went to my office to resume my normal duties.
During the ensuing years I have been interviewed by many authors, I have been quoted and misquoted. The facts remain as indicated above. I was not influenced during the original interview, nor today, to provide anything but what I know to be true, that is, the material I saw in General Ramey's office as the remains of a balloon and a RAWIN target.
www.roswellproof.com...
Could you specify what it is the government is trying to hide? Is it blue butterflies? You didn’t make that part known.
originally posted by: DupontDeux
As Mogul Flight Engineer Charles Moore said in his affidavit- "I can think of no other explanation for Roswell than one of our early June service flight balloons."
Project Mogul has never made sense to me as an explanation.
You are telling me, that a top secret project about balloons with microphones-crash was mistaken for something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, and military intelligence then WENT OUT OF THEIR WAY to create a cover story that is WAY CLOSER to the thing they are trying to hide?
Nope, not buying it.
To me it is way more likely that the story about it being a Project Mogul-crash is itself a cover story.
As per the quote, Charles Moore can think of no better explanation for Roswell than a Mogul balloon. It makes sense then, that it would be the best likely candidate for a cover story, too.
What doesn't makes sense is trying to hide having a blue butterfly, by yelling l "my butterfly is purple!" when everybody thinks all you have is a parrot.
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: mirageman
My father worked at White Sands in the late 50s - 80s He was a GS-15, Engineer. He knew alot about what went on at the base.
He said Roswell was a weather balloon from tests at the base.
He also said that the story had been very good for Roswell, a little podunk town in the middle of noplace.
originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: billxam
But that is the story you are supposed to believe and it still stinks today. Please, please, don't come with official documents to prove any theory. Everyone must understand, when the "officialdom" brings forth any documents, THEY are the people that actually own the equipment (typewriters, printers, official stamps etc. etc.) so they have no need to "forge" any document they can just produce it as if it was produced 70 years ago.
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: CoyoteAngels
I don't see anything wrong with the festivals and museum. They bring in tourist money, and I view them as more for entertainment and fun than anything. As for Good 'ole Stan Friedman. One of the original researchers into Roswell. He was a great speaker and entertaining too. But he rapidly learned how to deliver what people wanted to hear to make his talk circuit appearances bring in the $$$.
originally posted by: JumpTheGun76
a reply to: Ectoplasm8
So, this is what bothers me sbout this case. The military misidentified wooden sticks and foil to be a flying crashed disc? Howvdoes thst happen?
As far as I know, the breaking story saying flying disc was was from the military. Are they that stood to think that bits of foil and wood were s crashed disc?
...Due consideration must be given the following:-..The lack of physical evidence in the shape of crash recovered exhibits which would undeniably prove the existence of these objects[
originally posted by: JumpTheGun76
a reply to: Ectoplasm8
So, this is what bothers me sbout this case. The military misidentified wooden sticks and foil to be a flying crashed disc? Howvdoes thst happen?
As far as I know, the breaking story saying flying disc was was from the military. Are they that stood to think that bits of foil and wood were s crashed disc?