Holocaust Survivor Who Survived Nazis Now Ordered To Take Dangerous Covid Jabs

originally posted by: livinglight108
Look at the use of the FASCES symbol in the USA.

Look at the Swastika military building in San Diego.

Paperclip. Modern day MK-Ultra. Modern medical tyranny.

It's not that Nazis have returned to power. It's that the underlying sphere of dark occultists never lost power. They're winning the war against human freedom/right as they have been for centuries.

The Nazis did win WW2 in the end, apparently.

originally posted by: livinglight108
Look at the use of the FASCES symbol in the USA.

Look at the Swastika military building in San Diego.

Paperclip. Modern day MK-Ultra. Modern medical tyranny.

It's not that Nazis have returned to power. It's that the underlying sphere of dark occultists never lost power. They're winning the war against human freedom/right as they have been for centuries.

The Nazis did win WW2 in the end, apparently.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
Does it hurt to reach this far?

Elaborate please?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0


All were financed by the Fourth Reich, the money hidden in the banks in mostly neutral countries. Boreman knew where all the money was invested. It took them a few years but they seem to have infiltrated everywhere with cunning and stealth. Until people wake up to this it will continue. It is well documented that he was doing deals with Perron after the war, but by some miracle, they found his body not far from the Fuhrer bunker and identified it with DNA... which tells you how deep the state of Germany is invested in the new future. One MI6 intelligence officer was ordered to let him and his entourage depart in a steamer to Argentina. It might be all so bent it will have to be demolished.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

It seems we'll never learn from the past.

Except this time the technology is in place for the nightmare to go global.

a reply to: MykeNukem

my issue with how this topic is played is that it negates the part where the Nazis took liberal progressive ideals to the end conclusion..

the Nazis are at the tail end not the sharp point..

in understanding history we get a sequence started by liberals and taken to their natural conclusion by others..

so the question becomes will the liberal progressives take their ideals to their natural conclusion this tine or will other beat them to it and outrage the world in the process..

but the role liberal progressives played in setting the tone for the normalising the science the Nazis used should never be left out as the path they where on led to the same kinds of camps,

in a modern context these things where redesigned by the likes of Beveridge so the welfare state was designed to give the poor only so much but never enough to thrive, it was so enough died to keep their numbers down and weed out the weak genes from the gene pool over a longer period thus negating the need for other more brutal tactics.

in 70s build back better speak the aim was to use the welfare state to halve a given countries population over a few generations.. it's why they need the constant crises to keep the pressure up so the poor can not ever thrive..

we are now near the tail end of that cycle as most countries where by the late 1930s

where this goes to next will be interesting as processes go it feels either a fall like the soviets or a modern reformation.. Russia and China appear to be in waiting mode as they can see what'll happen next..

a reply to: nickyw

I'm sure my position will rattle many left wing cages, but i come from a liberal left that accepted its past which died off in the late noughties leaving me politically homeless.

until rcenly the accepted veiw of the liberal left to these topics
Eugenics: the skeleton that rattles loudest in the left's closet

in terms of how history resonates this extract feels very pertinent today..

The Fabians, Sidney and Beatrice Webb and their ilk were not attracted to eugenics because they briefly forgot their leftwing principles. The harder truth is that they were drawn to eugenics for what were then good, leftwing reasons.

originally posted by: Maxmars
In Europe apparently, they can use law enforcement to accomplish this against her will and will even sedate her if she objects "too strenuously."

Meanwhile, columnists in the British press are telling us all what we think and believe, "The people know Brexit was a mistake...". There appears a big drive for the govt to call a 2nd referendum.

This coincides with very low take up of the booster jabs and other than another Tory MP speaking up and losing the Whip (i.e., no longer permitted to speak in the House), the govt are silent on this issue. Their current stance is that healthcare workers are a scourge that must be redacted and controlled. Possibly because too many of them have refused jabs and boosters and are not towing the official line.

So, if we do end up back under EU directive, will we then see forcibly injected doctors and nurses? Followed by copious stats and data about high level take up amongst the health service and this used to first 'encourage' higher booster take up before £££m spent on enforcement action?

For anything similar on your side of the pond, jabs and boosters would have to be Federaly mandated?

a reply to: teapot

There is another wrinkle to that kind of thing over on this side of the Atlantic as well, within each state there is a potential for another layer of resistance to governance and mandates (by what are increasingly globalist committees.)

Of course, each state is led by members of the same corporate/political cabal as the federal government, but even being manned by members of the same group, each state retains a modicum of sovereignty that cannot be ignored outright.

We also suffer the presence of a media which no longer functions other than as a manipulation tool... informing us all of "what we all think." But that may be breaking down now ... as any such tool was bound to over time.

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
...

I offer you a word of caution. You are on the verge of diminishing the suffering of so many people that the correctional' impulse will hit you like a tidal wave.

This is referred to as "holocaust denialism" and is considered not just offensive (as it is often characterized here in the US) but essentially violent (as it appears to be in Europe.)

Too many on our planet have suffered these efforts...

You had best be sure of your reality before you make such assertions as to question whether "nobody was being exterminated there."

Unless of course you are deliberately trying to establish a 'denialist' element here... in which case "good luck" to you... you are about to be eaten alive.

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

Really??
Members of my own family on the Polish side were sent to the Siberian 'work death camps' in 1941, and they were Catholic. Some perished, some lived out their lives in Russia because unfortunately there was no home left for them in Poland.
Speak to some of the death camp survivors in person, you are in for an eye-opening experience in human suffering.

a reply to: teapot

"Meanwhile, columnists in the British press are telling us all what we think and believe, "The people know Brexit was a mistake...". There appears a big drive for the govt to call a 2nd referendum."

That simply is not going to happen.

People here are quite capable of making their own mind's up.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

First of all may God bless and look over this woman whom has suffered enough already in her lifetime.

I hope that someone in Germany is taking up this case as a matter of human rights as this sounds like both a breach of this lady's personal human right's and dignity and one that has been made by what to my mind would likely be a very evil judge.

Sadly the NAZI's never went away, those whom believe in eugenics, killing the sick for genetic or even financial reasons and preying upon the mass of the rest of humanity for there own gain are still very much with us today.

The NAZI's also while they lost a state and a short lived empire also never went away, they hid their ill gotten money's in safe havens and even some of there disgraced leaders and war criminals many of who lived to very ripe old ages and one for example continued his unethical experiments upon people with a village near to his haven a NAZI enclave in Chile having an unusual high rate of Twin birth's, this same evil doctor one experiments upon Twin's in the concentration camps.

Much NAZI wealth also hid in plain sight with the BLESSING of the American intelligence services as they used the NAZI's still extant intelligence network after WW2 against the Soviets, it hid in the big Pharmaceutical and Electrical corporations of Germany that saw a boom after WW2 as well as in north and south America and it still has a very strong presence in Germany to this day.

Now after the reunification of Germany there was also a very strong pro NAZI sentiment in east Germany that then re-infected west Germany, I would like to know from which region this Judge actually originates as that would give a psychological clue as to his reason for his judgement - perhaps.

Either way this is patently WRONG, even if this woman was truly mentally ill which I doubt very much as she sounds to be more than rational given her age this would still be a breach of human right's and of all medical ethical standards forcing a patient to take a treatment which they are ethically and morally opposed to.

This is basically a severe over reach by a nation state against the right's of it's people that should NOT be happening in a developed and civilized western nation, sadly this is nothing compared to some of the things the Yank's have done to there own people though so Germany for all it's ill's is not the worst example.

I wish this lady well and hope that someone with some decency takes up her cause as a matter of conscience and for the rights of the greater dignity of the human race which this obviously tramples upon.

a reply to: nickyw

e things where redesigned by the likes of Beveridge so the welfare state was designed to give the poor only so much but never enough to thrive, it was so enough died to keep their numbers down and weed out the weak genes from the gene pool over a longer period thus negating the need for other more brutal tactics.

But surely the purpose of the welfare state was only to provide a safety net of last resort which would allow people to avoid hitting rock bottom long enough for them to get back on their feet and to no longer need a safety net.

It wasn't to enable social Darwinism, or to stop social Darwinism. It was to ensure that people who fell on hard times wouldn't be trapped in a multi-generational poverty spiral in which entire families would effectively be doomed because they lost their primary breadwinner, or because their primary breadwinner wasn't able to support them for a period of time.

In my youth I lived under communism. Not creepy uncle Brandon communism with free college and gender neutral bathrooms for everyone whether you like it or not. Single party dictatorship Communism with side order of labor camps.

We weren't just given everything for free. There was a social contract, you were provided with a minimum standard of living in exchange for a minimum amount of labor. If you did more labor then you could earn a better standard of living.

a reply to: RonnieJersey

Well, after studying the subject hard for the past 20 years I would conclusively say what we're experiencing is the Apocalypse of the Bible.

Simply put the Apocalypse started on or just before the nation of Israel formed in 1948 and will conclude in the 2030s. As far as Covid is concerned I would say it's a manifestation of the 4th Horseman of Revelation. And all the crazy in the world is being turned up to eleven just in time for the last 7 years of said Apocalypse.

And one of the eventual goals is the human population of the world below 500 million people. By 2035.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Many of these other elites are just eugenics loving sociopaths like Bill Gates

Comparing people who killed millions, to people who want to save millions is not the way to make a valid argument.

Gate's ideas may be controversial, but he's using his own money to fund anti-poverty measures and to produce affordable anti-malarials, he's not building death camps.