Young and healthy man in his 20s ---Side Effects as a Result of Covid-19 Vaccine MASTER THREAD

www.bbc.co.uk...

13 December 2022

A man died of a blood clot that was a "direct result" of having the AstraZeneca Covid jab, a coroner said.

Jack, 27, from Stowmarket, was vaccinated on 30 March 2021 and a week later was admitted to hospital after experiencing headaches and sickness.

A scan on 10 April revealed a cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and he died 10 days later.

Senior coroner Nigel Parsley recorded a narrative conclusion at Suffolk Coroner's Court.

He said: "J.L. died of a blood clot to the brain, caused as a direct result of his body's reaction to the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccination which he had received on March 30, 2021."

Speaking after the two-day inquest, the solicitor working on behalf of the family said they would be pursuing a clinical negligence case against the hospitals involved in his care.

Another very sad story of a young and healthy man from England who has died as a result of the AstraZeneca vaccine. The coroner concluded that the victim died as a result of blood clots in his brain caused by the AZ vaccine. This a very well known serious adverse reaction associated with this particular vaccine and one of the main reasons the AZ vaccine is nowhere to be found in the UK and in most countries that have used it in the past.




www.bbc.co.uk...

AstraZeneca vaccine: Denmark stops rollout completely.

Denmark has ceased giving the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid vaccine amid concerns about rare cases of blood clots, the first European country to do so fully.

www.bhf.org.uk...

The latest on the AstraZeneca vaccine, from why it is no longer available in the UK, to statistics on the risk of blood clots.

www.reuters.com...

The Italian government said on Friday it was restricting the use of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine to people over the age of 60, after a teenager who had received the shot died from a rare form of blood clotting.

MOD NOTE
Please note:
All new mentions of autopsied vaccine-related deaths should be posted here.
Or to this thread if not autopsied, sudden death.
New thread starts about deaths from the Covid vaccine will be closed and directed here.
Thanks...and do NOT reply to this message!

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Wait, his family are pursuing a Clinical Negligence claim "against the hospitals involved in his care"?

The hospitals. Not the vaxx.

That word "rare" again.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Do you have an accurate tally on hand? It's still too rare for me to start counting.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Wait, his family are pursuing a Clinical Negligence claim "against the hospitals involved in his care"?

The hospitals. Not the vaxx.

That word "rare" again.

It doesn't change the fact that he died due to the vaccine or the fact the vaccine was withdrawn from the UK and several other countries that have used it.

Yes indeed 'rare events' and 'safe and effective' vaccines. Which are withdrawn for 'logistical reasons'

originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Do you have an accurate tally on hand? It's still too rare for me to start counting.

No need for counting.
The vaccine has already been withdrawn from the UK and most other countries that used it stopped the roll out.

It doesn't seem a great success. It's good they have withdrawn it as it would have liked and seriously injured many more people.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

The reasons that it was withdrawn are plain to see.

Rare is rare.

If this was some evil plan by TPTB, WEF, Bill Gates etc, do you think it would have been curtailed?

Where does your quote "logistical reasons" come from?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The reasons that it was withdrawn are plain to see.

Rare is rare.

If this was some evil plan by TPTB, WEF, Bill Gates etc, do you think it would have been curtailed?

Where does your quote "logistical reasons" come from?

On the last part you may have missed the sarcasm 'logistical reasons'.

On the rest you are engaging in some vaccine apologetics again and denialism of reality.

Yes it's 'rare' and the vaccines are 'safe and effective' but withdrawn...

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The reasons that it was withdrawn are plain to see.

Rare is rare.

If this was some evil plan by TPTB, WEF, Bill Gates etc, do you think it would have been curtailed?

Where does your quote "logistical reasons" come from?

how many "rare" events like this would it take for you to question your masters?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The reasons that it was withdrawn are plain to see.

Rare is rare.

If this was some evil plan by TPTB, WEF, Bill Gates etc, do you think it would have been curtailed?

Where does your quote "logistical reasons" come from?

how many "rare" events like this would it take for you to question your masters?

The member has been engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality and giving his support to a vaccine who has killed many and injured many more and has been withdrawn from the country that has made it as well as in most other countries that have used it.

The denialism is beyond belief.

Edit: wrong thread, but i'll leave the last one here.

Mainstream media is getting more curious now:

a reply to: Asmodeus3

No need for counting.
The vaccine has already been withdrawn from the UK and most other countries that used it stopped the roll out.

It doesn't seem a great success. It's good they have withdrawn it as it would have liked and seriously injured many more people.

You do realize that the astra-zeneca and the mRNA vaccines are the same thing, right?

originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: Asmodeus3

No need for counting.
The vaccine has already been withdrawn from the UK and most other countries that used it stopped the roll out.

It doesn't seem a great success. It's good they have withdrawn it as it would have liked and seriously injured many more people.

You do realize that the astra-zeneca and the mRNA vaccines are the same thing, right?

They're actually not. AZ uses a viral vector and is a DNA vaccine.

Of course that's assuming any of it is even close to what they're telling us since they wanted to wait 75 years to release trial results.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The irony is that a range of vaccine apologists and denialists of reality haven't even understood yet the difference between the AZ and mRNA vaccines and are trying to discuss matters without even knowing the basics.

Apologies, denialism, and defending of the pharmaceuticals.

The greatest irony is to try to argue that the vaccine is safe and effective and the serious adverse reactions rare when at the same time the vaccine is no longer around for health and safety reasons.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The reasons that it was withdrawn are plain to see.

Rare is rare.

If this was some evil plan by TPTB, WEF, Bill Gates etc, do you think it would have been curtailed?

Where does your quote "logistical reasons" come from?

On the basis of these 'rare events' and the 'safety and effectiveness' of this vaccine the decision was taken to withdraw it from the UK and most other countries that have used it.

Yes the reasons are obvious on why it was withdrawn.

They are described well in this thread. Actively the topic of this thread is the main reason on why it was withdrawn just as the Swine Flu vaccine and the Rotavirus vaccines were withdrawn in the past.