It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bar Hag will be Princess of Wales

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 07:20 AM
link   
So ... that bar hag Camella will be Princess of Wales after all. And then
Queen of England? Pathetic. Two unrepentant adulterers, who
caused pain and misery to their families will sit on the throne of
England. Good thing it is meaningless, except to their own over-
blown egos. Guess Charles HAS to marry her ... afterall, he has
been caught paying her bills with the tax money that the people
of England pay for his upkeep. From kept woman/bar hag to
next Queen of England all in one day. Amazing.
******************************************
www.timesonline.co.uk...

Excerpt -

The Sunday Times - Britain
April 03, 2005

Official: Camilla to be Princess of Wales
David Cracknell and Christopher Morgan

CAMILLA Parker Bowles will be given the title Princess of Wales when she
marries Prince Charles on Friday, the government will announce tomorrow.
The title will be confirmed in a parliamentary statement in response to a
question from Andrew Mackinlay, a Labour MP. It is likely to anger
supporters of the late Diana, Princess of Wales.

... Chris Leslie, the constitutional affairs minister, will confirm tomorrow that
she will be given all her husband’s titles. The list includes Prince of Wales,
Duke of Cornwall, Duke of Rothesay, Earl of Carrick, Baron of Renfrew, Earl
of Chester, Lord of the Isles and Great Steward of Scotland.

Vivienne Parry, who worked closely with Diana for several years, was
alarmed at the disclosure. “How crass! You have to take account of the
nation’s sensibilities. To the nation, Diana, Princess of Wales was
irreplaceable,” she said.

...

However, the polls show that the public is less keen on Parker Bowles
getting a meaningful title or becoming queen. A poll last month found that
just 7% thought she should be queen.



[edit on 4/3/2005 by FlyersFan]




posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 07:22 AM
link   
I wouldn't worry to much mate. By the time Charles gets to be king, either he will be too old and won't last long, or we would have got him to abdicate his succession rights and opted for William (who is a rather nice bloke) instead.



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 07:29 AM
link   
Speaking of Charles ... did you see His Royal Super-Ego and the
comments he got caught making?

www.timesonline.co.uk...

It was on the news here in America.
He smiles at the
grubby 'little' people, all the while shoving his nose in the air
and saying how much he hates them.


He and Camilla deserve each other. They have created a
hyper-reality for themselves. It's disgusting.



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 07:52 AM
link   
I have read that, I can't say I am surprised and I agree with him. The press have all but wrecked his life, and that of his kids, so his comments where well founded.

He does not mean people, as in the population, he was referring to the idiot tabloid press, and their lust for sensationalist stories.

But still, I feel the law is the law, and Charles shouldn;t be King.

Long live King William III!



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 07:55 AM
link   
Bar Hag? What a charming turn of phrase.

Do you have a list of your up coming character asassinations or will you be keeping us in suspense?



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 08:18 AM
link   
Selfish, shallow fools marry!

Dull dull dull dull dull!

The monarchy is dull, tedious and unecessary except when:
Dressing as Nazi's
Swearing at the Press (and indirectly the people who pay for their lifestyles)
Suggesting that the media is owned by Jews.

Anything else they've done this year?

Some ugly slapper will be queen one day. So what?



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 09:17 AM
link   
Steward of Scotland...

:spits:

Scotland don't need no stinkin' Steward.

I swear, if there was ever a time for Scotland to retake its sovereignty it would be now. Hell, they make up half the military, and with the world on board to liberate all oppressed peoples, what better excuse?

It's been too long...

My family home was sold to Al Fayed..

Land partitioned off and auctioned to a room full of inbred imperialists...

Family disbanded because they wouldn't turn traitor like the rest...

Disgraceful. I think now would be the perfect time to liberate Scotland back to the Scottish people. I once debated painting myself with Wode and charging the gates of Al Fayed's home, but his dogs and Uzi toting security staff dissuaded me. And I went to all that trouble sharpening my axe...



In all seriousness though, Scotland should be free, and the royals should be lashed backwards to a donkey and exiled from the land, never to return.

I got a special kick out of the Queen's refusal to attend, based on her allegiance to CoE.
Anybody even remember who started CoE or why?
Obviously the Queen doesn't.

[edit on 3-4-2005 by WyrdeOne]



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 09:37 AM
link   
You can't tell me that they didn't know this would have to happen, all that "Princess Consort" and "Dutchess of Cornwall" BS was just a smokescreen to blunt initial criticism...if the Royals didn't know they're even more stupid and useless than even I thought.



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 09:38 AM
link   
Alongside that though, Wyrdeone, I think us Cornish should be free!

The cornish flag is rather drab though:



Maybe we should adopt the Pisky as Mascot:



My family has noble origins also, I may lay claim to the throne of Cornwall!
Then I can lead the Cornish Liberation Army towards London from the South, whilst the Free Scots Brigades can march from the North!

As a famous Scot may have once said......They may take over three quarters of my wages in Tax, but they'll never take my freedom...or something...

[edit on 3/4/05 by stumason]



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 09:40 AM
link   
Bar hag? Really now - my opinion is that this personal barb is slung because of a combination of endearment for Princess Di, that Camilla is not as young and beautiful, and because Camilla was the other woman.

If the truth be known - it appears to me Charles and Camilla are a bit of a true and long-running love affair. And if anybody should have a barb thrown at them it would be Charles - not Camilla. He's the one that decided he needed to go ahead and get married to some one he didn't love just for the sake of producing an heir.

It is my understanding that she will be Princess Consort, and can never be the Queen....she can't even ever be the Queen Mother - because she's not William's mother.

I'm an American and have gotten that much figured out - well, with a little help from my U.K. friends


P.S. I would also like to point out that here lately Camilla has been looking very nice. I don't know if she got a face lift or what, but she has looked a lot "fresher" here lately - since physical seems to be important to some.

[edit on 4-3-2005 by Valhall]



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 12:54 PM
link   
Yes flyers this "bar hag" is just as presentable as mr lets dodge draft and smoke coke..



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 01:57 PM
link   
You know, if there was such a title as Queen of England I wouldn't mind this "bar hag" becoming the next Queen, however, there's a Queen of the United Kingdom and that means not only will Camellia hold the gracious title of Princess of Wales, to much of my protest but also Queen of the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the other Constitution monarchies that our Queen is the head of State..... - Just a little Snapple pack!


Princess Dia will forever be our Princess.



[edit on 3-4-2005 by Patriot]



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 02:03 PM
link   
Why does everyone act like these silly soap opera lifestyles are something new with the royals? Take a look through history and you will find some amazing stories.



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 02:08 PM
link   
You know, speaking as a UK citizen, not a single person has an interest in the royal family these days, they are the diplomats that nobody wants...

I have not met a single person who agrees with the continuation of the royal family, bunch of scroungers really..

Charles is pompous, camilla has no voice for herself. I must admit that the Queen has not done anything wrong and should be our last monarch out of respect but Charles..... give me break, the guy will be senile in less than 5 years...

They serve no purpose other than to stave the British economy more than is neessary and if financial attachments removed would help the economy no end.... Charlie demands £12 milllion a year, for WHAT???? let alone the other direct member of the faily and the hanger ons...

As the Dutchee of Cornwall, Prince Charles is entitle to receive all monies from people in Cornwall if the do not have a Will written... theiving 5CR073!!!



posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 04:09 PM
link   
What, it would be better if she did coke and used her daddies money/power to get out of draft? Hypocrits.

Anyways, at one time all monarchies were related, IE Blue Blood inbreds. Who cares what a bunch of rich Southerners do, or what the royal family does?



posted on Apr, 4 2005 @ 12:05 AM
link   
It looks like this unholy matrimony with the "bar hag" will take place on the same date as the Pope's funeral...is it just me or is anyone else smelling NWO here.



posted on Apr, 4 2005 @ 02:26 AM
link   


It looks like this unholy matrimony with the "bar hag" will take place on the same date as the Pope's funeral...is it just me or is anyone else smelling NWO here.


Thats a bit far fetched! Seeing as the Wedding was arranged weeks ago, unless they knew exactly when the pope was going to croak....



posted on Apr, 4 2005 @ 05:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by infinite8
Why does everyone act like these silly soap opera lifestyles are something new with the royals? Take a look through history and you will find some amazing stories.


- Did you know one of Camilla's ancestors was mistress to the King?


her maternal great-great-grandmother, Alice Keppel, was the long-time mistress of Charles's great-great-grandfather, Edward VII.

www.greatdreams.com...

- Obviously being the King's whore is something that must run in here genes!


'King Charles'........ 'figurehead', 'example'?!

I think not.

(....and as his sour outburst last week illustrates perfectly he hasn't even the relaxed 'fun' element helping balance anything out like his namesake Charles 2nd)

interesting too that with Edward the 8th the commonwealth and dependancies were supposedly key in deciding his unfitness as they (apparantly) would not stand for 'him with her'.
Anyone want to bet that side of it all is quietly down-played and forgotten?


[edit on 4-4-2005 by sminkeypinkey]



posted on Apr, 4 2005 @ 07:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
Two unrepentant adulterers, who
caused pain and misery to their families will sit on the throne of
England.



Ummmm....you "do" know the history of the monarchy don't you!? You do know what other "kings" and Queens have done throughout this "royal" family don't you? Seems to fit right in to me!



posted on Apr, 4 2005 @ 07:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Valhall
Bar hag? Really now - my opinion is that this personal barb is slung because of a combination of endearment for Princess Di, that Camilla is not as young and beautiful, and because Camilla was the other woman.


BAR HAG ... because she is one. She was a whore. She still is a whore.
She made vows in God's house then cheated on her husband, and
had her lover break the vows he made to God and his wife. She
didn't care about making promises to God and family and breaking
them. She has never repented, nor apologized to ANYONE that her
behavior has harmed. Diana would still be alive today if Charles
(the tampon-wanna-be) and the bar-hag hadn't continued to
commit adultery and rub it in her face. Camilla's behavior is
disgusting. Calling her a bar-hag has nothing to do with her
physical looks, it has to do with the muck that oooozes from her
black soul.

LATEST NEWS - Now Charles has decided to put off the wedding one
day so he can go to the funeral to represent the royal family. Is it
out of respect for the pope (charles has never respected religion,
God, or anything holy in his entire life)... or is it because he had to
move the wedding date one day because no one would come, they
would all be at the funeral?? Wanna' bet Tony Blair was happy that
the funeral was supposed to be on the same day, so he could get
out of having to go and watch the two sickos do their wedding thing?
Bet William was glad the funeral was on the same day so he could
get out of going to the wedding and he'd go to the funeral.

I can't believe Charles is having Diana's children go watch him
marry the woman that made their mother's life miserable and
that indirectly caused her to be in that car accident that killed her.

When Diana and Charles were married, the entire planet tuned in
and people were festive around the world. When the bar hag and
the tampon marry, no one will care and no one will be attending.
They are



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join