It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by billmcelligott
If it is left un - challenged the reader may well think it is fact.
Sorry Bill, I challenge that. I have no choice reading this forum, my job but it becomes appearent very quickly that the EVIDENCE leans towards those that present it and you know who that is. Continued bickering actually turns one off of both sides.
Originally posted by sebatwerk
I don't know intrepid, that attitude is what got Masonry to where it is now, in the firts place. I see your point, but these antis have gone un-challenged for too long, and look what's happened:
all the books bashing masons
all the "popular myths" about masons
all the conspiracy theories about masons
And all this is at least in partn due to the fact that masons have adopted a policy of silence and non-confrontation in the past.
Originally posted by sebatwerk
Originally posted by Zystesxt9
Hey Seb, was it not you, who said, " show me some info to some of MY claims, and I ( YOU) will shut up"?
if not sorry .
if so, when do u propose tom shut up?
it doesnt matter how much info u guys get... You will always defend your truth... That is only human.
And Ilks will do the same.
I said I would shut up if you could provide CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE of your claims. Up until now, you have done no such thing, only heresay, circumstance, supposition and assumption. Read the terms and conditions.
[edit on 13-4-2005 by sebatwerk]
Originally posted by The Axeman
Good stuff my friend, but I was talking about Eliphas Levi. Perhaps he didn't "come up with" Baphomet, but he did elaborate and he drew this representation
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by Zystesxt9
You will always defend your truth...
That we will. We WILL defend the truth....while you continue to lie.
And Ilks will do the same.
HA HA HA HA! Do you even know what the word "ilk" means? Do you understand the context in which it was originally used by me? I admire that you've taken it upon yourself to call yourself that...but the word is "trolls"
Originally posted by sebatwerk
And by the way "NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM" Means "A new Order For The Ages", NOT "New World Order". Just another example of how you try to twist facts to suit your agenda.
Originally posted by Zystesxt9
So, if you really want to know something from one of us ilks...
I think you guys are full of SH**.
and thats all I wish to say.
Originally posted by Zystesxt9
Yes, senrak, I do infact know what ilk means.
It means ... A kind of person.
I aint as silly as you would like to think.
Originally posted by Zystesxt9
Sebatwerk, It would not matter how much information I, or any one of the ilks, put up regarding the matters on this thread. You will never read them with any such respect, because it is based at yourselves, so anything I say to you is taken as severe regurgitated BS, and anything you say to me is certainly taken with regard to the trash I put out yesterday and the stuff my cat leaves on the ground after a good feed, so all in all, this thread is just a complete waste of time to you and me. would that be a true sentence?
Anyway, In regard to the Freemasons on this site, and to all other Freemasons who may visit this thread in the near future.
What the hell is wrong with a great debate, nothing. but nothing ventured is nothing gained, especially when the information posted on here by the so-called ilks, is well known to everyone, but you and your queer mates who only wish to laugh at us, and poke fun at the spelling mistakes others make.
Thanks for the no info on your behalf that is true enough to be regarded as gospel.
I think you guys are full of SH**. and thats all I wish to say.
ILKS
Originally posted by yanchek
Originally posted by sebatwerk
And by the way "NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM" Means "A new Order For The Ages", NOT "New World Order". Just another example of how you try to twist facts to suit your agenda.
This is arguable. I think we covered the meaning of this latin quote in Dollar Bill thread. It is not about twisting the fact it's about different point of view.
About disclosure of "secret" Masonic knowledge.
They are following a simple rule. "You don't give whats holy to the dogs, and you don't feed pearls to the swine."
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by Driver
That knowledge could set this world free and would help stop the New World Order.
Perhaps that's what we're trying to do....just perhaps. Perhaps those "high-ranking" Masons everyone says is involved in the NWO are there to help destroy it from within. Just perhaps.
Originally posted by JonestownRed
This doesn't make sense Senrak, George Bush Sr. Is a mason right? Bohemian Grove right? Former CIA director right? Omega agency member? Maybe... Why would the masons want to stop the NWO. I would think that the masons would see a good NWO scenario as ideal.
Originally posted by billmcelligottSo are you saying that any accusation should be left un challenged then ? Should I stand by at let untruths stand alone?
I have to agree, we get blasted for being silent and when we speak up we are told it is better if we say nothing.
Zystesxt9
What the hell is wrong with a great debate, nothing
Originally posted by JonestownRed
Are you sure GB Sr. isnt a mason? I thought he was. If not, I apologize for that. Anyways, why would the masons be against a good NWO?
[edit on 14-4-2005 by JonestownRed]
Originally posted by JonestownRed
Interesting. Harmony is my ideal as well. I am not a mason, however.