I've read it mate and WOW! I'm impressed. A blue grass engineer working for - Boeing! That explains yer loyalty to the product but don't
explain why you don't like anything that's not made in America.
Yes all those poor countries read all the sales blurb about Apache, but the after sales service. What's that all about.
At least here in the UK, GKNWestland knows all about building propper helicopters 'cause they're taking your basic Apaches - which you've very
kindly assembled for us at your place - then rework them and bring them up to what army calls A(W)H or AH(W) 1 standard. Something to do with rotors,
avionics and weapon systems. We've also replaced your FFR's with our own 70mm FFR's.
One serious question though mate. Why such a small amount of ammo for the main gun? I've never understood that and on the same subject, can it be
reloaded during flight?
Just heard on BBC News 24 that Canada has pulled out of the deal with your company. Bad news mate.Hope things get better for you. (Not taking the
mickey)
Best Attack Helicopter, page 4
privacy
reply posted on 21-6-2005 @ 12:47 PM by Off_The_Street
First, let me apologize (or as you guys say, ‘apologise’) for the “kid” and “youngster” comments. Even though I have seven or eight years
on you, us old pharts gotta stick together against these young punks out there!
I try not to buy American or Japanese, I try to buy good.
I think everyone knows that there is only one country which knows how to build real motorcycles, and I have owned three of them: a Triumph Tiger Cub, BSA Road Rocket, and Royal Enfield Interceptor (and yes, I had the misfortune of owning an American Heavy-Dangerousone as well as about ten Japanese bikes which are tremendously reliable but have no soul).
And, when everyone’s home, there’s a ’97 Nissan Sentra, ’99 Isuzu Trooper, and ’05 Scion tC in my driveway. No Detroit Iron there, thank you very much.
And finally, when I want to seriously counsel someone and it may involve high-velocity metatarsal-to-gluteus maximus interactions, you can bet I’ll be wearing my Doc Martens!
A typical procurement takes about three years (and I have worked as Proposal Manager on two of them – Japan and the UK). You would not believe how tremendously involved the questions and requirements are from potential customers. In the UKs case, we beat the Aerosplat Tiger, and in Japan’s case we beat the Bell Whiskey Cobra. (In the case of Japan, there were others, like the Rooivalk, Agusta, and Kamov, but they were eliminated right away due to inability to meet the requirements.)
Boeing (neé McDonnell Douglas) has always had a problem with support, although I think it’s a lot better than it was ten years ago. No one can touch Bell for support, of course, since they’re all over the world. We were definitely the underdog in Japan, because they already built – under Bell License -- the UH-1 and AH-1. The problem was that the Whiskey was late, and expensive, and it didn’t have the all-weather capabilities that the Longbow did.
When MD was negotiating with GKN, one of the deals being considered was that we’d build the MD-101 (an EH-101 with a different paint job). The fact that we didn’t was, in my opinion, a big mistake. The EH-101 is one of the greatest transport helicopters made, and would’ve done a tremendous service to expanding our product line. However, neither MD nor Boeing considered the helicopter as a major part of our product offering.
Until about six months ago, when I left International Programs, I worked on the Boeing-Westland SRP (Support Reappraisal Programme) effort. One of the big things we do is to make sure that each team knew what the other team was doing, so that we’d eliminate redundancy in our upgrade paths. As far as radios, almost every customer uses their own gear, since it’s a major portion of the procurement, allows for domestic content (their engineers, their products), and allows for their own unique interoperability needs. For instance, the Westland Longbows use Marconi radios, the Subaru Longbows use Shin Yagai radios, the Israeli Longbows (which are built here) use their own proprietary electronics stuff, etc. As far as rotors, you guys have blade de-ice; we don’t. We just don’t see the need, not doing North Sea ops like you guys do. We have a” blade-fold kit”, which I’m guessing you guys will get, too, since you use the C-17 to transport the Apache, and a blade-fold kit allows for much faster deployment after the aircraft is unloaded from the C-17.
As far as weapons, I know that you use a different FFAR, and my guess is that you will probably be increasing the capability of your airplanes to fire a wider range of guided missiles, too. I also guess (and this is just a guess) that the Japanese will be the first to really integrate ATAS (air-to-air stingers) onto their airplanes. BTW, the Subarus have the capabilities for snow skis (Honest!)
Answer to question number 1: Because the US Army (like the Brits and everyone else except the Germans in the 1930s, planned for the last war, not the next war. The Apache was supposed to fight and die in buying time for the allies by using its HELLFIREs to defeat Soviet BMP and tanks as they came pouring through Fulda Gap at the onset of World War III. It didn’t happen, of course. And now it appears that, given the softer targets in the modern battle environment, the HELLFIRE is overkill. My guess is that most planners would give up either some of the HELLFIREs or the FFARs in order to double or triple their load of Chain gun ammunition.
Answer to question number 2; No, and that is a Bad Deal indeed! However, we have a semi-automated loader that permits the gun to be reloaded by one person while they’re re-fueling the airplane in the FARP – in about five minutes.
I got the news three days ago, and here’s our June 18th spin on it (www.boeing.com... ):
What can I say? I guess I can take comfort in that we didn’t lose to Airbus; the Union just voted against the cost-cutting approach, and now they’re not getting any airplanes at all AFAIK.
why you don't like anything that's not made in America.
I try not to buy American or Japanese, I try to buy good.
I think everyone knows that there is only one country which knows how to build real motorcycles, and I have owned three of them: a Triumph Tiger Cub, BSA Road Rocket, and Royal Enfield Interceptor (and yes, I had the misfortune of owning an American Heavy-Dangerousone as well as about ten Japanese bikes which are tremendously reliable but have no soul).
And, when everyone’s home, there’s a ’97 Nissan Sentra, ’99 Isuzu Trooper, and ’05 Scion tC in my driveway. No Detroit Iron there, thank you very much.
And finally, when I want to seriously counsel someone and it may involve high-velocity metatarsal-to-gluteus maximus interactions, you can bet I’ll be wearing my Doc Martens!
Yes all those poor countries read all the sales blurb about Apache, but the after sales service. What's that all about.
A typical procurement takes about three years (and I have worked as Proposal Manager on two of them – Japan and the UK). You would not believe how tremendously involved the questions and requirements are from potential customers. In the UKs case, we beat the Aerosplat Tiger, and in Japan’s case we beat the Bell Whiskey Cobra. (In the case of Japan, there were others, like the Rooivalk, Agusta, and Kamov, but they were eliminated right away due to inability to meet the requirements.)
Boeing (neé McDonnell Douglas) has always had a problem with support, although I think it’s a lot better than it was ten years ago. No one can touch Bell for support, of course, since they’re all over the world. We were definitely the underdog in Japan, because they already built – under Bell License -- the UH-1 and AH-1. The problem was that the Whiskey was late, and expensive, and it didn’t have the all-weather capabilities that the Longbow did.
At least here in the UK, GKNWestland knows all about building propper helicopters…
When MD was negotiating with GKN, one of the deals being considered was that we’d build the MD-101 (an EH-101 with a different paint job). The fact that we didn’t was, in my opinion, a big mistake. The EH-101 is one of the greatest transport helicopters made, and would’ve done a tremendous service to expanding our product line. However, neither MD nor Boeing considered the helicopter as a major part of our product offering.
…'cause they're taking your basic Apaches - which you've very kindly assembled for us at your place - then rework them and bring them up to what army calls A(W)H or AH(W) 1 standard. Something to do with rotors, avionics and weapon systems. We've also replaced your FFR's with our own 70mm FFR's.
Until about six months ago, when I left International Programs, I worked on the Boeing-Westland SRP (Support Reappraisal Programme) effort. One of the big things we do is to make sure that each team knew what the other team was doing, so that we’d eliminate redundancy in our upgrade paths. As far as radios, almost every customer uses their own gear, since it’s a major portion of the procurement, allows for domestic content (their engineers, their products), and allows for their own unique interoperability needs. For instance, the Westland Longbows use Marconi radios, the Subaru Longbows use Shin Yagai radios, the Israeli Longbows (which are built here) use their own proprietary electronics stuff, etc. As far as rotors, you guys have blade de-ice; we don’t. We just don’t see the need, not doing North Sea ops like you guys do. We have a” blade-fold kit”, which I’m guessing you guys will get, too, since you use the C-17 to transport the Apache, and a blade-fold kit allows for much faster deployment after the aircraft is unloaded from the C-17.
As far as weapons, I know that you use a different FFAR, and my guess is that you will probably be increasing the capability of your airplanes to fire a wider range of guided missiles, too. I also guess (and this is just a guess) that the Japanese will be the first to really integrate ATAS (air-to-air stingers) onto their airplanes. BTW, the Subarus have the capabilities for snow skis (Honest!)
One serious question though mate. Why such a small amount of ammo for the main gun? I've never understood that and on the same subject, can it be reloaded during flight?
Answer to question number 1: Because the US Army (like the Brits and everyone else except the Germans in the 1930s, planned for the last war, not the next war. The Apache was supposed to fight and die in buying time for the allies by using its HELLFIREs to defeat Soviet BMP and tanks as they came pouring through Fulda Gap at the onset of World War III. It didn’t happen, of course. And now it appears that, given the softer targets in the modern battle environment, the HELLFIRE is overkill. My guess is that most planners would give up either some of the HELLFIREs or the FFARs in order to double or triple their load of Chain gun ammunition.
Answer to question number 2; No, and that is a Bad Deal indeed! However, we have a semi-automated loader that permits the gun to be reloaded by one person while they’re re-fueling the airplane in the FARP – in about five minutes.
Just heard on BBC News 24 that Canada has pulled out of the deal with your company. Bad news mate. Hope things get better for you. (Not taking the mickey)
I got the news three days ago, and here’s our June 18th spin on it (www.boeing.com... ):
SEATTLE, June 18, 2005 -- We share Air Canada 's disappointment at today's developments because we are looking forward to being a part of Air Canada 's vision for leadership. We are seeing very strong demand for the 777 and the 787, and we believe we will have many opportunities to place these aircraft elsewhere.
What can I say? I guess I can take comfort in that we didn’t lose to Airbus; the Union just voted against the cost-cutting approach, and now they’re not getting any airplanes at all AFAIK.
reply posted on 21-6-2005 @ 02:36 PM by zhangmaster
Wow, I'm pretty much sold on the AH-64D. I was just researching it and I'm very impressed with it's capabilities. I mean, the original apache was
great, but the Longbow blows it out of the water. I got the below information from the link provided at the bottom.
The tests clearly demonstrated that Longbow Apaches:
--Are 400 percent more lethal (hitting more targets) than the AH-64A, already the most capable and advanced armed helicopter in the world to enter service.
--Are 720 percent more survivable than the AH-64A.
--Meet or exceed Army requirements for both target engagement range and for probability of acquiring a seleted target. The specific requirements and results are classified.
--Easily can hit moving and stationary tanks on an obscured, dirty battlefield from a range of more than 7 kilometers, when optical systems are rendered ineffective.
--Can use either its Target Acquisition Designation Sight or fire control radar as a targeting sight, offering increased battlefield flexibility.
--Have the ability to initiate the radar scan, detect and classify more than 128 targets, prioritize the 16 most dangerous targets, transmit the information to other aircraft, and initiate a precision attack -- all in 30 seconds or less.
--Require one third less maintenance man hours (3.4) per flight hour than the requirement.
--Are able to fly 91 percent of the time -- 11 percent more than the requirement
www.voodoo.cz...
[edit on 21-6-2005 by zhangmaster]
The tests clearly demonstrated that Longbow Apaches:
--Are 400 percent more lethal (hitting more targets) than the AH-64A, already the most capable and advanced armed helicopter in the world to enter service.
--Are 720 percent more survivable than the AH-64A.
--Meet or exceed Army requirements for both target engagement range and for probability of acquiring a seleted target. The specific requirements and results are classified.
--Easily can hit moving and stationary tanks on an obscured, dirty battlefield from a range of more than 7 kilometers, when optical systems are rendered ineffective.
--Can use either its Target Acquisition Designation Sight or fire control radar as a targeting sight, offering increased battlefield flexibility.
--Have the ability to initiate the radar scan, detect and classify more than 128 targets, prioritize the 16 most dangerous targets, transmit the information to other aircraft, and initiate a precision attack -- all in 30 seconds or less.
--Require one third less maintenance man hours (3.4) per flight hour than the requirement.
--Are able to fly 91 percent of the time -- 11 percent more than the requirement
www.voodoo.cz...
[edit on 21-6-2005 by zhangmaster]
reply posted on 21-9-2008 @ 05:19 AM by fritz
My compliments to you, Off_The_Street because I thought this thread had died a natural death when up popped your reply.
You raise some very interesting points , not least the issue of Hellfire being so expensive.
A very good friend of mine who uses Hellfire out in the 'Stan told me he recently popped 2 middle ranking baddies at a cost [he reckons] of $100,000 [ish] each person.
I am surprised that your company has not looked at the Viet Nam era Gunship configuration that was all to familiar on the old Huey Gunships.
Having said that, whilst trawlling through the utter rubbish about aero-weaponry on the web, I came across the following site:
www.g2mil.com...
Seems to me to be a step back to the future, if you'll excuse the pun but a gunship varient of the Apache - much like the B17 Gunships and the early Hueys is, in my humble opinion, a giant leap forward in sky to mud support.
What's needed is an aircraft that has a range of about 1500 miles, can loiter for a couple of hours on call, and can carry shed loads of ordnance - i.e a mixed load of cannons, bombs, rockets, mines etc
Now, if someone had the balls to deploy the Skyraider..............................
You raise some very interesting points , not least the issue of Hellfire being so expensive.
A very good friend of mine who uses Hellfire out in the 'Stan told me he recently popped 2 middle ranking baddies at a cost [he reckons] of $100,000 [ish] each person.
I am surprised that your company has not looked at the Viet Nam era Gunship configuration that was all to familiar on the old Huey Gunships.
Having said that, whilst trawlling through the utter rubbish about aero-weaponry on the web, I came across the following site:
www.g2mil.com...
Seems to me to be a step back to the future, if you'll excuse the pun but a gunship varient of the Apache - much like the B17 Gunships and the early Hueys is, in my humble opinion, a giant leap forward in sky to mud support.
What's needed is an aircraft that has a range of about 1500 miles, can loiter for a couple of hours on call, and can carry shed loads of ordnance - i.e a mixed load of cannons, bombs, rockets, mines etc
Now, if someone had the balls to deploy the Skyraider..............................
reply posted on 19-7-2009 @ 09:56 PM by projectvxn
The TRICEROCOPTER
A few of these and wars in backward countries Americans have never heard of and it would be over in minutes...If not from fear, laughter.
A few of these and wars in backward countries Americans have never heard of and it would be over in minutes...If not from fear, laughter.
reply posted on 20-7-2009 @ 04:24 PM by on_yur_6
Originally posted by adub
My favorite is the MH-60 DAP, it is flown by the 160th Soar "Night Stalkers", here is a picture
unx1.shsu.edu...
If it's anything like the HH-60H/SH-60F/SH-60B, there isn't any armor. Kevlar on the pilot and copilot's seats but that's about it. Self sealing gas tanks help. Only two databuses for the computers. Doesn't the Apache have three?
Nice looking bird not as sturdy or nimble as the dedicated attack birds out there.
Israeli Company Has FAA Permission to Fly Drones in U.S. Airspace
Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
First possible near-collision of unmanned drone and commercial aircraft in US airspace.
Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags
Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags
Low-Tech Solutions To High-Tech Tyranny (Save links before they are gone)
Posted 0 days ago with 4 member flags
Posted 0 days ago with 4 member flags
America\'s Next Bomber: Unmanned, Unlimited Range, Aimed At China
Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags
Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags
The 450 million rounds of hollow point ammunition for DHS....my thoughts..nefarious....or not????
Posted 9 days ago with 3 member flags
Posted 9 days ago with 3 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
"Low Cheek Bones" Warren Stonewalls Reporter on Claiming Minority Status( watch her twist)
2012 US Elections: 7 minutes ago
2012 US Elections: 7 minutes ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Democrat Hypocrisy on Full Display…Another Non-Issue by the Left
US Political Madness: 17 hours ago, 20 flags
US Political Madness: 17 hours ago, 20 flags
Trees that witnessed the rise and fall of empires throughout history
Fragile Earth: 8 hours ago, 16 flags
Fragile Earth: 8 hours ago, 16 flags
Blue Springs, MO: Multi-Colored Objects Seen for Weeks - May 24, 2012
Aliens and UFOs: 16 hours ago, 12 flags
Aliens and UFOs: 16 hours ago, 12 flags
Rand Paul Amendment to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Raiding Farms Fails, 78-15
US Political Madness: 16 hours ago, 10 flags
US Political Madness: 16 hours ago, 10 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Democrat Hypocrisy on Full Display…Another Non-Issue by the Left
US Political Madness: 17 hours ago, 328 replies
US Political Madness: 17 hours ago, 328 replies
How can people say that everything is made of energy and energy is light?
Philosophy and Metaphysics: 13 hours ago, 46 replies
Philosophy and Metaphysics: 13 hours ago, 46 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.385 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.385 seconds
