It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: shooterbrody
It is illegal
Now being charged is a different story, but don't attempt to pretend laws were not broken.
What law was broken running a computer task 38K times that overwrote the logs?
Not sure which task you're referring to, but the data recovery process explicitly shows thousands of files were deleted within 48 hours of the audit by an undocumented user, all of which is suspicious to say the least. Federal law doesn't make exceptions when it comes to election records, or certifying voting machines, or allowing unauthorized access to data. 3 strikes.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: interupt42
Nothing wrong with being skeptical, everything wrong with assessing the sum total of data to be a nothing burger. This isn't speculation, it's an autopsy pointing to homicide. You have to review the entire document and watch the Maricopa presentation (where the digital forensics expert translates his discoveries on court record) to properly frame the facts.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: Arnie123
OMG, someone let Trump know that he can come back to office now.
lol, you can get all hyped up over this, maybe march on the capital again?
We must have very different definitions of "big deal".
Don't make demands of someone you, yourself, are unwilling to do. I'm not seeing much substance in your posts either. Mostly assertions with nothing to validate them.
For instance, show us one easily obvious lie Trump has told, that excludes things he tried his best to accomplish but was blocked by the democratic cabal in dc.
This piece of # we have now won't even answer press questions. He reads the prepared script and walks off the stage. This guy is a demented, made man of China that tows the line of his handlers.
I have 0 confidence in the election along with anything our gov't is putting out there as the narrative from either side.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: shooterbrody
It is illegal
Now being charged is a different story, but don't attempt to pretend laws were not broken.
What law was broken running a computer task 38K times that overwrote the logs?
Not sure which task you're referring to, but the data recovery process explicitly shows thousands of files were deleted within 48 hours of the audit by an undocumented user, all of which is suspicious to say the least. Federal law doesn't make exceptions when it comes to election records, or certifying voting machines, or allowing unauthorized access to data. 3 strikes.
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: shooterbrody
Again with the deflection, irrelevant statements, and inability to support your claim.
You made the wild statement that a program running 38K times at randoms days which utilizes revolving logs is against the law.
So the burden is on you to prove such claim and the voters retention law as far as I'm aware does not deal with certain programs utilizing revolving logs .
So Again show me where the voters retention law deals with a program being executed to many times or utilizing revolving logs as being illegal?
Again like I said I don't have confidence in the election or the govt , but if this is their smoking gun then is a non smoking gun.
Does it make it convenient and highly suspicious that the program overwrote system logs, sure it does.
Is it stupid practice and irresponsible to inappropriately configure the revolving logs, sure it was.
Are there govt suggestion guides on logging, sure there are, but they aren't laws.
The question is can they be held accountable by law for running such a program? I highly doubt it will stick in court because as far as I know their is no law that prevents such a program from running or from utilizing revolving logs.