Nancy Pelosi to Violate the U.S. Constitution with a Snap-Impeachment of President Trump.

a reply to: Brassmonkey

They want to prevent Trump from holding any office again. Also, he can lose his Presidential pension(he will need it with his financial woes). Some have speculated he could lose the lifetime secret service protection also.

a reply to: rnaa

I am convinced the Senate refused to hear evidence from his 1st impeachment because had they heard it they would have had to vote to convict and remove him from office. This was their plausible deniability excuse to vote No.

Trump was impeached once already, however the spineless Senate majority were Republicans who did not want to upset their MAGA voting base and refused to vote yes.

Obviously these facts will not be popular on here, being this site is flooded with the pro-Trump crowd.

I am a bit worried that so many on here continue to make excuses for Don the con.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Brassmonkey

They want to prevent Trump from holding any office again. Also, he can lose his Presidential pension(he will need it with his financial woes). Some have speculated he could lose the lifetime secret service protection also.

So, basically you wish to see him destitute and DEAD then.

Classy!

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: jimmyx
NO...she didn't violate the constitution, you guys are WRONG, impeachment can be for whatever reason congress deems appropriate at the time...

Nope
It has to be for high crimes or misdemeanor

Sorry you are incorrect

trying to get state election officials to change vote counts so trump could win...that's a crime pal

a reply to: carewemust

Constitution?
Democrat Leadership dont need no stinkin' Constitution!

I can't wait to hear from the direct evidence witnesses 😃

Nancy has also violated her own insane Rules by using gendered language today!

mobile.twitter.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
Nancy has also violated her own insane Rules by using gendered language today!

mobile.twitter.com...

Oh, please let someone call her out on that.


If it was AOC who called her out, Pelosi would probably pull out a gun and shoot her dead on the spot.

originally posted by: jimmyx
NO...she didn't violate the constitution, you guys are WRONG, impeachment can be for whatever reason congress deems appropriate at the time...

so you believe impeachment should be used as a tool to get revenge on a political rival?

I just want to see the words.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

I did not say that, please do not try to speculated what I think.

However, many are calling for Trump to lose secret service protection, which I am unsure is even possible.

a reply to: network dude

So you think Trump is innocent and had nothing to do with the storming of the Capitol?

a reply to: tanstaafl

That's right - the House proceedings are not a trial.

Until the impeachment vote takes place all you have is an investigation.

During that investigation witness were 'invited', didn't show, were subpoenaed, and subpoenas ignored.

At no time was the President refused the opportunity to reply to the charges and in fact the investigation was blocked by the White House in every possibly way.

It is 100% wrong to spin the House investigation as refusing to hear input from the President - the President refused to provide input and actively blocked the investigation from hearing input from people who might even have helped clear him.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: jimmyx
NO...she didn't violate the constitution, you guys are WRONG, impeachment can be for whatever reason congress deems appropriate at the time...

Nope
It has to be for high crimes or misdemeanor

Sorry you are incorrect

And 'high crimes or misdemeanors' are what the Congress decides they are.

a reply to: rnaa
No
Still have to be actual crimes....
In this case the senate has said f you so it doesn't matter anyway

No conviction again, house dems impotent once again.

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: jimmyx
NO...she didn't violate the constitution, you guys are WRONG, impeachment can be for whatever reason congress deems appropriate at the time...

Nope
It has to be for high crimes or misdemeanor

Sorry you are incorrect

trying to get state election officials to change vote counts so trump could win...that's a crime pal

Is it?
What crime genius?
Perhaps you should read the transcript, trump didn't ask to change ANY vote.
Are you drunk?

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: rnaa

I am convinced the Senate refused to hear evidence from his 1st impeachment because had they heard it they would have had to vote to convict and remove him from office. This was their plausible deniability excuse to vote No.

Trump was impeached once already, however the spineless Senate majority were Republicans who did not want to upset their MAGA voting base and refused to vote yes.

Obviously these facts will not be popular on here, being this site is flooded with the pro-Trump crowd.

I am a bit worried that so many on here continue to make excuses for Don the con.

You like that middle finger from co kain mitch?
Your impotent peach mint is done.
Lol
Not even a nice try.
Just more refuse from trashy people.


I would have actually respected a censure.

Not enough time sham or not....

Side thought ..doing this almost certainly will mean Biden will be impeached...?

Maybe thats what Pelosi and her sidekicks Really want...

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: network dude

So you think Trump is innocent and had nothing to do with the storming of the Capitol?

Yes. It is obvious.

1. He didn't say anything to incite a riot or to attack the Capital building, in fact he used the word peace multiple times,

2. His supporters enjoy his speeches, so they wouldn't have started their march to the Capital building until his speech was over,

3. The attack on the Capital building started long before his speech was over, and it is a 45+ minute walk from where his speech was to the Capital building.

So, no, he had nothing whatsoever to do with the violence.

originally posted by: rnaa
a reply to: tanstaafl
Until the impeachment vote takes place all you have is an investigation.

During that investigation witness were 'invited', didn't show, were subpoenaed, and subpoenas ignored.

Pure BS. Not one single Republican Representative witness was allowed. NOT ONE.

At no time was the President refused the opportunity to reply to the charges and in fact the investigation was blocked by the White House in every possibly way.

It is 100% wrong to spin the House investigation as refusing to hear input from the President - the President refused to provide input and actively blocked the investigation from hearing input from people who might even have helped clear him.

The delusion is strong with this one...

originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
Who will save the citizens of the greatest military on earth from its insane and soulless royal class?

It seems we're going to have to take care of ourselves.

Here is a video clip of an ANTIFA-BLM "cell" preparing in a hotel suite to infiltrate Trump supporters, and provoke a riot, on Wednesday, January 6th.

Video Clip: twitter.com...

No wonder Nancy Pelosi was in such a hurry to Impeach President Trump. SHE KNEW that the President did not "Incite an Insurrection" as she claimed!

And the China/BLM-friendly news media is ONLY reporting when a Trump-supporter is arrested for the mayhem that occurred last week at the nation's Capitol complex.