posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 09:39 AM
Than I guess your a follower of the Republican party. I love how there seems to be 2 different sets of rules depending on your party. WHat gets me is
Freemason's blind rage.I feel anyone coming here reading these posts will absorb information & come to their own conclusions.This may require some
research, but most people are intelligent enough to make up their own minds & don't need ditton heads to help them along.
There are 2 sides to every story.But not for Freemason.Theres his side & the 2nd side are people who are mis-informed & dumb.Example,I list a long
list of Clinton's accomplishments that are taken from the National Archives & the White Houses own website.Freemason will discredit these sites as
being boased & liberal,but the same sites that point out Reagans & Bush sr.'s accomplishments,well then they're 100% fact!
FM ignores any good that Clinton has done because it interferes w/his blind rage & hate for the man.He's not one bit rational.Most reich wingers feel
the louder you are the more right you are(Rush Limbaugh,Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity,etc)The longer your post/more time you spend='s your more
credible/correct. I'm waiting for FM to have a hissy fit & start screaming "SHUT UP,SHUT UP,SHUT UP!!!" like O'Reilly did w/his breakdown on
national tv.Reich wingers don't like it when you disagree with them or present fact.FM keeps asking me to debate his claims.
I can't FM.Why?because you'll only shoot them down no matter how credible my sources may be.You disect Clinton's accomplishments & explain how they
aren't true then maybe I'll play your game of footsies.Reichwinger/Clinton haters ususally are wrong in their claims.They also ususally shoot their
mouths off which later gets them in trouble,kinda like Michale Savage(Weren't you banned FM once from here because someone disagreed w/your views on
religion?)Could be wrong,but I thought it was you.
All you & Thomas have are the same rumors,heresay, & gossip the Clinton haters have been ditto spewing for years.The FACT there is not credibility to
these claims doesn't matter.You keep hoping if you drill at them long enough someone may be eventaully believe them.The ditto heads no longer bring
up troopergate.Why?Because the author of the article,David Brock admitted he was paid off by a certain right wing millionare to write lies about the
Clinton's.Brock later appologized & wrote a book, "Blinded by the Right".One of the troopers admitted he lied & was mad that Clinton didn't offer
him a job & there was another trooper that lied & admitted this in writting.Yet these FACTS are ignored & the other lies are reported non-stop.
I'm no fan of Reagan or Bush, but I must admit they did some good.Anyone who can't admit Clinton did SOME good is an ignorant, mis-informed,
bitter,foolish,sourpuss of a person who's not living in reality.The man was elected not once but twice, his approval ratings were high during what
monicagate,he strengthened the economy yet your most devout Clinton hater will ignore the obvious so they can be right.They cater the facts to their
advantage just to bring him down.
FM, I don't care what your background is.No need to rant off your resume.You sound somewhat insecure,as if having all these qualifications make you a
little smarter than the rest here ATS.You ignore data from the National archives & the White House's own web site,yet you find Drudgereport,Newsmax,&
Worldnetdaily to be credible sources of information & news & you have the nerve to say I'm mis-informed!
CLinton is the most in demand public speaker & the highest paid President who has spoken(however,Reagan spoke for 1 million dollars in Japan shortly
after he left office)I doubt Bush will get the money Clinton got to write his memoirs & I doubt it will sell as well. Unlike Bush, Clinton knows what
typical Americans go through & this is why he was so embraced by many in this country.
Clinton wsn't born into money.He actually had to study hard,make good grades, & work to get to where he is.He didn't use his fathers money,influence
or name to get to where he is.Clinton has a brain.The man can speak at great lenghts on just about any topic.He often use to through away his index
cards when giving a speech & speak from the heart.Bush can't even read a teleprompter.He can't even listen to the ear bug he has when someone asks
him a question.This is what happens when you have someone pull strings to get you into school vs.someone working for it & learning.I doubt many know
how difficult it is to become a RHodes Scholar.Only a select few are chosen per year.Clinton knows about struggle.He was raised by a single mother &
they didn't have much money.Bush will never know what its like to worry about wheather or not his Health insurance will pay for his Prescription.Or
how he's gonna pay next months mortgage or make that car payment.Clinton can relate & the right wingers hate him for that.He is the perfect example
of the American success story.Many even said Bill Clinton ws the 1st Black President because he reached out to minorities & reminded them that WE ARE
You speak of his sneaky personna with hsi "What is your definition of 'is'is?" Well, Ken Starr was a lawyer who kept asking him the same questions
for hours during his grand jury testimony.They kept trying to trick him & re-word the questions because they had very little & they were hoping he
would mess up.He didn't thought.He beat them at their own game.Clinton is accused of being sneaky because he found ways around answering questions
w/out taking the 5th & attempting to protect himself,yet Ken Starr does the same type of lawyer tricks re-wording questions & its okay.Like I
said,with Republicans there are 2 sets of rules.Clinton slippery talked himself out of questions that had nothing to do with anything except to bring
him down & Ken Starr wanted Clinton to help him bring himself down.
Example,Clinton answered the definition of what he considers oral sex by Ken Starr's definition that was in the written deposition(this is why he
kept referring to it & rarely asked for his own lawyer to help advise)Clinton's answer was by what Ken Star considered oral sex,not Clinton's.These
questions had no business being asked(all this time & energy & we had terrorist plotting an attack.Maybe if more time was focused on security & less
on Clinton's penis those 2 towers would still be standing)
History will judge Clinton as being a great President.I love how Clinton ahters claim" The good economy under Clinton was thanks to Reagan & Bush &
the bad economy under Bush jr. is due to Clinton" LOL! Talk about Desperate! Greenspan himslef even admitted the recession began in March of 2001
During the tax cuts! Clinton walked into a mess left by Bush sr.& I didn't hear him bitch & moan.No, he rolled up his sleeves & got to work!
So continue your Clinton bashing.Your credibility is so-so.The more you post, the more you prove my point.
CLINTON HELP US!!!