OP/ED: Dark Days. (The black band on ATS), page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 16-3-2005 @ 09:46 PM by Nygdan
Originally posted by Pisky
Dump the lobbyists for a start.

But that requires that no one is allowed to advise or inform the politicians.
Vote only for the person and his/her beliefs and make them work for your vote.

People rarely vote the strick party line, or at least rarely only vote because of the party. Look at the US election. You didn't have to be a republican to dislike kerry. Infact, its obvious that that wasn't the case; since democrats outnumber republicans, some democrats voted for bush.
So the candidates beleifs are going to tend to be in line with one party or the other, because the parties are in line with the major lines of thought in the public, and the candidates are simply members of the public anyway.
Given that, the addition of party machinery, which by nature and necessary intent, seeks to maintain itself and its membership, only adds to the inevitable problem.
Limit the amount of corporate financial support available.

I don't think anyone disagrees with this. However, no one can agree on how it shoudl be done. Certainly, corporations have a right to contribute to politicians. Certainly, citizens have a right to contribute to politicians and parties also. So how can that right be effectively limited? I agree, corporate influence is a problem. Alongside that, the contributions and influences of interest groups, and private collections of people, is a problem. Can they be limited also?

I remember once reading that any American had the chance to become President. If that was every true, its not anymore.

Clinton.


reply posted on 16-3-2005 @ 09:58 PM by Amorymeltzer
It's a problem that's been discussed here, and elsewhere, many a time.

Take the ever classic example of Ali G. Now there's a great show. But, once the guy gets famous, he can't get those interviews anymore. People know him, people recognize him, and the show's lost. Candid Camera as well. It's become such a huge part of American culture that a lot of the initial wonder is lost because when something weird happens you either shrug it off or think "Better Smile!" We've got at least one thread here (which I can't find at the moment) that discusses the problems of reaching mainstream society.

What if, just what, would happen if ATS hit it big and drew in a huge crowd?

Why, it'd be great, of course!

Except, I'm not so sure, and as I recall, neither were the rest of us. Because letting everyone in means letting everyone in. We thrive here because we are able to detach ourselves from the Status Quo and yet still view it properly to discuss its merits. When we, in fact, become the status quo, it becomes a lot harder to do that. We have issues start to pop up. Spin, bias, bickering and downright attacking. And we've all seen examples of this.

And the staff has dealt with all of this in a highly applaudable way. ATS is first and foremost a conspiracy board under the glowing headerDeny Ignorance. Politics is inherently an issue in conspiracies, by far one of the larger ones. The news is tied to EVERYTHING. And so, with the truly prodigious result of
ATSNN comes a huge influx of political issues. And so PTS came. Because political threads started to discuss Liberal Vs. Conservative views and not "Poly meaning many, Tics meaning blood-sucking parasites" it was separated.

There was no failing on the part of anyone. Every good ship springs a leak every now and then, and every good ship runs ashore. Weathered, they call it. All it takes is a great crew to caulk up the ship and raise the sails. Ya just gotta put a second watchman on deck. And so I say, in the wise words of Mad Eye Moody,

CONSTANT VIGILANCE!


reply posted on 16-3-2005 @ 09:59 PM by alternateheaven
I can only wonder why it was chosen to openly state the blatanly obvious, but then I guess its better to make things clear for those who may not have noticed the subtle changes. My input most likely means spit due to my relatively short membership when contrasted against many senior members, but even in the year and few months I have been active on the site I have noticed the trends of which everyone has already spoken.

We all here may want to Deny Ignornace, but in doing that we have overlooked the fact that we are just like those we view as propagating Ignorance; human. We screw up, we err, and we are all suceptible to being played no matter how strong willed and independant we think outselves to be. Could anyone here really expect the community to not be infected by the same virus that runs rampant through the rest of the population?

The way I see it the polarization we see here is just a carry over of how we all feel in the real world, but on a much more open field. As much as I and probably many others would like to see the removal of the usage of slaging political terms, its just not going to happen without implementing draconian meausres which would cause most of ATS to cry foul. Even that would probably not solve the problem, the only real solution requires so much of every single person that correction and change is neigh on impossible (but not completely). I wont bore anyone further with banter of change and correction of the issues at hand, those are all better tackled by someone of true ATS stature.


reply posted on 16-3-2005 @ 10:00 PM by Gools
Getting at the truth of a matter means being open to accepting uncomfortable conclusions, even conclusions or findings coming from other ideological viewpoints.

I understand what you are getting at SO but you have framed it in the American two party context.

Politics for me personally is about issues. I have voted for four different parties in my lifetime, there were five parties in the Canadian Parliament just a few years ago (4 right now) and there are other fringe parties as well. They are all corrupt to some degree because that's what power and influence does to people.

I hold no blind allegiances to any of them.

I never understood people's undying loyalty to a political party. Can someone explain that to me? Why would someone limit themselves like that?

Why can't we take ideas from all quarters and address issues on a case-by-case basis? I have tried to resist any ideological constraints ever since I can remember. I never liked anybody telling me how I should think. That’s why when people label me as liberal or socialist or communist and yes even conservative on occasion it makes me crazy.

Just because you identify as conservative/liberal on one issue does not mean that you have to be a conservative/liberal on all issues, or that liberals/conservatives are your sworn enemy, or that any information coming from a source from the "other" camp is automatically dismissible. This mindset seems to prevail in a society where winning is everything and you must destroy your enemy by any means. I see that mindset creeping into Canadian politics and looking how far it has succeeded down south I fear that kind of division. Because the phrase "divided they fall" has been a truism for millennia.

Thankfully there is still plenty of flexibility and compromise (that is NOT a dirty word) in Canadian politics. Unfortunately we don't have the influence on the world that the US has.

You say why not yell at the puppet master rather than yell at the puppets?

Because we are puppets who do not know they serve masters. Worse. Some people don't know that they don't know! Those who see the strings and point them out are called names and are ostracized. Others believe that the masters are people rather than ideology or ideas. We are slaves to ideas and bad ones at that. "Education" and indoctrination does the rest.

People on ATS have fallen victim to US centric political culture or the "foreigners" are simply staying away. There is even one person who replied to a post of mine telling me that I had no business commenting on a US matter (and I am not alone in that club). As if my rational mind could not possibly understand an issue, apply an insight or form an opinion because I live an hour's drive on the wrong side of a line on a map. (funny I can never find those damn lines on the ground)

I don't know what the solution is or if it even exists. I can see and understand what is going on but can't quite express it in words (even this post is getting muddled) mush less begin to formulate a response to the closed mindedness I encounter here (or the tactical argumentative attacks based in ego).

At some point it’s just not worth the effort anymore.

Are we there yet?
.


reply posted on 16-3-2005 @ 10:08 PM by the_oleneo
I like to add my thoughts here about this solemn subject:

We have fallen because our ideas and beliefs are too different, too different for some, too stubborn for others, and too dang stubborn for the few. It's not about the right or the left and what political conspiracies beholden to the agenda to divide and conquer between the right and the left.

We have fallen to the diversity of ideas and beliefs from others to the point such wisdom and conviction have become murky and confused. Blame our upbringing. Blame our own educations. Blame ourselves for it. Blame our short-sightedness, our bias, our fondly nurtured prejudice, our weaknesses, our sin of fallen short of the glory and grace of God.

Your wisdom is not the same as mine. My wisdom is not the same as yours. Common interests, mutual beliefs and shared basic principles in life are all we have for our normal lives. But our wisdoms to life are vastly different. An old man's wisdom is based on his own lifetime experiences but it is not the same as yours nor mine. All of us goes through life with different experiences, different things, different circumstances, etc., of which to give us different ideas and beliefs over the years.

When you all were young children, do you remember the very ideas, however childish or naive, you'd came up while growing up? Do you still hold onto that ideas as you're growing up or has life made you lose such childish/naive ideals as you come face to face the daily realities?

Do you still believe or had it changed?

I cannot expect my ideas and beliefs to be superior or important over others, at least I try to express it myself the only way I know how to communicate through here or anywhere with anyone. I can accept yours as you can accept mine, I may reject yours as you may reject mine. Not everyone's ideas or beliefs meshed together well. We all express it differently. At least we give each other the benefit of doubt.

Deny ignorance, deny balance, deny whatever. But don't deny yourself the opportunity to express your core ideas and beliefs, they aren't right and they aren't wrong, but they are YOURS. People will take what they can either accept or reject as you can either accept or reject theirs. People will bicker or slam others, such is life. People will talk or discuss about anything with others, such is life as well.

Let others divide and conquer all of us. We are doing the same thing to them, as always. The struggle of ideas and the diversity of beliefs are what keep us down-to-earth and humbled.


One more thing: there will always be stupid people saying or posting stupid things here or anywhere, because they either don't know any better or just being ignorant of the obvious.


reply posted on 16-3-2005 @ 10:18 PM by SomewhereinBetween
Lamenting any change in ATS without making clear the philosophy of same via articles of by-law and adhering to them will not correct whatever issues play heavily on the mind(s) of the owner(s) of this site. When I joined here six months ago I was delighted by the number of extra-north American posters, what they had to offer, and teh diversity of their topics, but that membership seems to be steadily diminshing. I am not surprised, as I have in a subtle way, on more than one occassion, highlighted a decisive move toward alienation by bringing this to the attention of the power that is, but to no avail and with no acknowledgement.

The motto of this site is; deny ignorance, but ignorance seems to have been limited to the definition of the Webster's New collegiate Dictionary. Perhaps it should be; promoting world-wide diversity of thought; or challenging dogma; or even something as simplistic as; ATS: where the world finds freedom of speech.

At the time of this writing, only one country has been mentioned in previous posts, this is clearly indicative of what political approach this site is coming to represent. As such, there are only two such views represented, left and right according to that country's standards.

ATS has many wonderful attributes in that the administration has obviously laboured to make the content appealing to just about every topic of discussion they can think of, but like it or not, politics will always play a large part in world affairs, and it will be the decisive factor which sets the tone for membership.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 2 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 15 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 2 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 12 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 60 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.