I'm glad that it was said, just not that it had to be.
Here, I think this is kind of what SO is talking about (right?):
Power Grab Through Executive Orders
As Clinton Spoke Words of Hope, Riot Police Swung Into Action
Many, many articles written pre-Bush about Clinton look eerily similar to things people are saying about Bush. It's just that the political
affiliations of the people saying them have flipped. I could find many more examples as it took longer to write the BB Code than look them up.
That's the thing. Six years ago Republicans were ranting and raving about Clinton creating a police state and making unjustifiable acts of
war. Those same people are now defending the similar actions of the President. And on the flip side of that, the people defending what Clinton
was doing are working themselves into a tizzy over Bush. It's so frustrating.
It's good that people are finally waking up to some things, but I have the sinking feeling that if a Democrat is elected in four years the script
will once again flip.
Every one allies with their team and can't see past red or blue. Or in some cases the Red, White, and Blue.
The course of the nation did not begin on Inaugration Day 2001, and not every action or event that takes place in the country can be attributed to the
President. I think some people fail to realize that.
[edit on (3/16/0505 by PistolPete]





