It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
According to the source material in the article, the title of the article is falsely alluding to it mutating into a more aggressive (which translates to more lethal for the most part) strain. That has been stated repeatedly in the start of this thread. Something that, IMO, the OP should have read their own source article before posting something the admittedly know nothing about and likely didn't even read it seems.
I prefer reading, understanding, and then posting a personal interpretation/opinion on the articles I source in my threads. I think every ATS member should do that as opposed to finding a sensationalist story title, and posting it here with little to no opening post containing their analysis.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Krakatoa
And why do you believe it's become more agressive?
You have a lab you confirmed it with or you read it on some faceless website on the internet?
Six of one dude...six of one. They're both half a dozen.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: ArMaP
Maybe it's just people jumping to conclusions due to misleading terminology. The spread might be called aggressive if it's about avoiding precision in journalism, but this allegedly mutated strain is cool as a cucumber and never really gave AF to begin with.
Clickbait idiots wasting our TIMES. No wonder people are jumping to the wrong conclusions, they're literally supposed to do so.
How can the OP not see that was the case unless they didn't actually read the article and just posted this thread in response to the sensationalist title?
originally posted by: rickymouse
Viruses are one of natures ways of keeping the population down.
originally posted by: toolgal462
OP please correct this as the virus has mutated into a less aggressive strain according to the article.
The less aggressive strain, identified as ‘S’ appeared to be the ancestor of the more aggressive one, ‘L’.
Strain ‘L’ was found to be more prevalent at the start of the original outbreak in Wuhan but began to subside in early January. The S type has since become more common.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: rickymouse
Hundreds of new viruses are discovered each year. Do you believe they were all created by anything other than nature or god if you lean towards that?I
Not everything stems from nefarious means or conspiracies.
Why can't anything ever just be normal # that happens.
No, here in ATS land the whole world is a jigsaw puzzle.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: rickymouse
Viruses are one of natures ways of keeping the population down.
Bingo! So is war, mass exterminations, etc.. Humankind would have extincted ourselves long ago without "unnatural" ends to our life.