It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Halfswede
For those questioning about when/why the WHO labeling this a pandemic, you may not have caught this from the presser yesterday.
UPDATE 2-WHO says it no longer uses ‘pandemic’ category, but virus still emergency
“There is no official category (for a pandemic),” WHO spokesman Tarik Jasarevic said.
“For the sake of clarification, WHO does not use the old system of 6 phases that ranged from phase 1 (no reports of animal influenza causing human infections) to phase 6 (a pandemic) that some people may be familiar with from H1N1 in 2009,” he said.
Who knows, they may never call it.
originally posted by: myselfaswell
originally posted by: Halfswede
For those questioning about when/why the WHO labeling this a pandemic, you may not have caught this from the presser yesterday.
UPDATE 2-WHO says it no longer uses ‘pandemic’ category, but virus still emergency
“There is no official category (for a pandemic),” WHO spokesman Tarik Jasarevic said.
“For the sake of clarification, WHO does not use the old system of 6 phases that ranged from phase 1 (no reports of animal influenza causing human infections) to phase 6 (a pandemic) that some people may be familiar with from H1N1 in 2009,” he said.
Who knows, they may never call it.
On face value I'd say the use of the word pandemic is fine for movies and when we don't actually have one. Calling a pandemic a pandemic would cause too much panic in those who need to be told there's a pandemic.
We really want to prepare the American public for the possibility that their lives will be disrupted because of this pandemic,” Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the Center for the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, told reporters.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: ketsuko
Agreed, critical infrastructure will (should) be prioritized thus ensuring that basic necessities can be met. There a a large number of people who aren't hospitalized who require electricity to run machines which help keep them alive/healthy and/or medications from spoiling.
If we start seeing large numbers of people unable to work, across this sector (critical infrustructure) especially, things could go pear shaped with a quickness.
It's not the disease that concerns me, it's the fallout from the disease that would pose the larger problem; knock on effects that many never consider.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy
Not from illness. No.
Everybody is not going to get sick. Dont take everything to extremes.
This isnt a Stephen King novel.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Sillyolme
This seems to be a glass half empty kind of group.
Just saying.
Wishing you all the best.
I honestly do not think this is going to be some mass killer.
Think positive people.
I agree, what I find more concerning is the potential for a major disruption in supplies.
Hungry desperate people will be the issue.
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Sillyolme
This seems to be a glass half empty kind of group.
Just saying.
Wishing you all the best.
I honestly do not think this is going to be some mass killer.
Think positive people.
I agree, what I find more concerning is the potential for a major disruption in supplies.
Hungry desperate people will be the issue.
Currently, I don't think many people are thinking that far ahead . I am though.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy
Why would the power go out?
Has your power ever went out?
If so, for the same reason(s).
Downed trees, car accidents taking out a pole, squirrel shorting out transmission lines... etc.
Now, add to that the fact that if everyone is sick, there will be a definite shortage of workers to repair downed lines and blown transformers.... not to mention manning the control rooms at power generating stations.
originally posted by: ragiusnotiel
San Fran declares state of emergency
twitter / sf chron
COVID19: What do we have to fear from a pandemic? Jennifer Cole PhD is an Associate Fellow at the Royal United Institute for Defence and Security Studies a UK-based policy think tank, where she ran the Resilience and Emergency Planning programme until 2018. She worked with UK and international government agencies on policy planning around the response to serious infectious disease outbreaks. She is now a full-time Research Fellow at Royal Holloway, University of London. When people use the word ‘pandemic’ it tends to incite fear. It conjures up pictures of widespread death and societal collapse, the Hollywood movie version of what would happen and how the world would(n’t) cope with a new, unknown disease. History lessons of the Plague of Athens, the Black Death and, more recently, Spanish Flu bubble to the surface of collective and cultural memory. Millions of deaths. Bodies piling up in the streets. Society breaking down. But take a deep breath (through an N95 respirator mask if you want to be careful), step back and try not to panic. Even if the worst case prediction of case fatality rates – currently running at around 2% [1] turn out to be true – and it is increasingly looking as if this is a high-end estimate that doesn’t take into account the many cases that go unreported because symptoms are mild – there is no reason to think that this will equate to societal and economic collapse; the 1918-19 influenza outbreak had a similar CFR but didn’t, even in world already economically depleted by WWI . There are currently 7.6 billion people in the world: even 2% less than that is still a lot more than 7 billion. The world won’t lose all its doctors, or airline pilots, or software developers, or rap artists.
NEW: Germany reports another case of coronavirus near border with the Netherlands; the man is in critical condition
The U.S. military is bracing for coronavirus cases to rise in Germany, potentially putting thousands of troops on lockdown or restricted movement, according to the head of U.S. European Command.
"We're anticipating an increase in the number of cases reported in Germany," Air Force Gen. Tod Wolters said in response to questions from Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing Tuesday.
Chevron instructed its workers at its London office to work from home Tuesday after an employee experiencing flu-like symptoms was tested for coronavirus, a person familiar with the matter told CNN Business. In an abundance of caution, employees at the office located in London's Canary Wharf business hub have been told to work remotely until results from that test are known, the person said. There is no known coronavirus outbreak in the office. The Westferry Circus office is home to several hundred Chevron (CVX) employees, including commodity traders, shipping experts and lawyers. "Chevron continues to monitor the situation very closely, utilizing the guidance of international and local health authorities," the company said in a statement. "Our primary concern is the health and safety of our employees and we are taking precautionary measures to reduce their risk of exposure."
originally posted by: XCrycek
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy
Why would the power go out?
Has your power ever went out?
If so, for the same reason(s).
Downed trees, car accidents taking out a pole, squirrel shorting out transmission lines... etc.
Now, add to that the fact that if everyone is sick, there will be a definite shortage of workers to repair downed lines and blown transformers.... not to mention manning the control rooms at power generating stations.
They still had power in Wuhan even during the worst outbreaks. Why should it be any different over here where the situation won't get out of hand like Wuhan?