It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
Mueller clarified that "not being able to indict a sitting president" did not factor into his report or findings.
When a criminal investigation or special counsel decides they have not found enough evidence to indict or press charges then you have been cleared or exonerated by default.
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
Since Trump,and Bill Barr, claimed that the report exonerated him. "No collusion, No obstruction".
Also, since the report clearly stated that the report did not exonerate Trump, only that DOJ policy forbid Mueller of indicting a sitting president, which is why Mueller clearly tossed the ball to Congress, in his report.
Barr on the other hand has evidence that points to
criminal actions committed by the FBI
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
There was never any spying from the Obama admin.
That is trump lies or active imagination or paranoia. You pick.
But that any of it was true is not on the table.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Sillyolme
They’re still trying to blow up the low-level FBI lawyer that screwed up one or more of the FISA warrants that has already left the FBI into “criminal wrongdoing on the part of the FBI.”
It’s rank desperation at this point.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
There was never any spying from the Obama admin.
That is trump lies or active imagination or paranoia. You pick.
But that any of it was true is not on the table.
There is no question spying occurred. It is only whether that spying was illegal.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
You’re making a semantic argument. Spying is pejorative. Certain individuals associated with the Trump campaign were criminals, and the FBI acquired the proper warrants to investigate them covertly which resulted in indictments, convictions, etc.
Calling it spying merely implies that it was done improperly, which we have no evidence of, only supposition.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
Mueller clarified that "not being able to indict a sitting president" did not factor into his report or findings.
When a criminal investigation or special counsel decides they have not found enough evidence to indict or press charges then you have been cleared or exonerated by default.
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
Since Trump,and Bill Barr, claimed that the report exonerated him. "No collusion, No obstruction".
Also, since the report clearly stated that the report did not exonerate Trump, only that DOJ policy forbid Mueller of indicting a sitting president, which is why Mueller clearly tossed the ball to Congress, in his report.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
You’re making a semantic argument. Spying is pejorative. Certain individuals associated with the Trump campaign were criminals, and the FBI acquired the proper warrants to investigate them covertly which resulted in indictments, convictions, etc.
Calling it spying merely implies that it was done improperly, which we have no evidence of, only supposition.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
You’re making a semantic argument. Spying is pejorative. Certain individuals associated with the Trump campaign were criminals, and the FBI acquired the proper warrants to investigate them covertly which resulted in indictments, convictions, etc.
Calling it spying merely implies that it was done improperly, which we have no evidence of, only supposition.
I think my post fully clarifies everything. I explicitly stated it may have been legal when I said we are still questioning if it was illegal.
Spying happened. Was it wrong? We will see.
False and that makes you a liar as well.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Arnie123
The member you’re addressing is certainly not “lying” and “you all” accept what you hear in your chosen media. Also, you don’t speak for anyone but yourself, so stop the fallacious forum gang crap arguments.
In point of fact, after 34 indictments and convictions of individuals and 3 companies, the Mueller investigation turned up plenty of evidence of criminal activity DIRECTLY related to the Trump Campaign and Russian interference in our Elections.
SO just stop the attempts to silence another member, k? Bring some facts ... like maybe you can cite sections of the report that say that Trump was found innocent of any crimes, oh, wait, the report SPECIFICALLY says the opposite, and explains why indictments were not brought, NOT because there was no collusion or obstruction of justice, but because the DOJ’s internal rules DO NOT PERMIT the indictment of a sitting President.
If anyone is LYING here, it’s sure as heck not anyone who says that the Mueller Report did not exonerate Trump.