Televised Impeachment Inquiry Nov. 13th. I invite ATS members to utilize this thread

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Pyle
So the GOP lawyer is asking the witness what another person thought.... does this guy even lawyer?

The entire case against trump, including Taylor and Kents claims, are what what trumps thoughts were into why he wanted an investigation in Burisma and 2016 election interference.

I guess its only what Trump thought if you are ignoring all the evidence and other witnesses.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Representative: Person that represents the will of the community.
Senator: Person that represents the will of the state.
Judge: Person that represents the definition of the law.
President: Person that enforces the law.

Fundamental civics of a Representative Republic. So a member of the House should vote in accordance to the wishes of their constituents, not their party affiliation and certainly not their own conscience. But as I said, that ship sank long ago.

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: LogicalGraphitti

It has nothing to do with feelings, despite your insistence/failed attempt to link my opinion via some silly voodoo to Trump's malfeasance.

Your 'feeling' excuse is just a misdirection because a more substiantiative argument you could make is rather vacuous.

You're calling it misdirection why, because you don't agree with my statement? Fine, have it your way. I'd don't to insult your sensibilities.

Because you making the argument that my points are invalid because I don't like president Trump is juvenile and patently poor attempt to 'shift the goalposts'.

a reply to: Grambler

Exactly, on both of your posts at the top.
A couple of interesting exchanges.

One second he's appalled that Ukraine would meddle in 2016, next second he's attempting to justify it.

Then, after basing a large portion of his testimony on interpreting what Trump is thinking, he inexplicably loses his power to interpret what Trump is thinking.

Why does Mr. Kent have a big rain gauge sitting on the table to his right?

It could be for urine collection. Argh.

Kent admits we had a fiduciary responsibility to investigate Burisma because we give Ukraine aid.

Ok then why was it wrong for Trump to investigate it?

investigations into energy companies in ukraine?
oh my
imagine that

investigation into a fleeing criminal absconding with millions

hmmmmm

originally posted by: Grambler
Kent admits we had a fiduciary responsibility to investigate Burisma because we give Ukraine aid.

Ok then why was it wrong for Trump to investigate it?

seems this matter is at a conclusion

could you look into this?

a reply to: Grambler

Maybe because the Democrats are worried that The Trump admin/President would find more dirt and scandals on the democrats as well? makes you wonder. Yet the president has every to investigate whatever they wish after they are the Commander in Chief, not Media Puppet in Chief.

a reply to: Wayfarer

Truth be told I agree there’s not a lot of evidence anywhere it’s all speculation. But that’s all some people need .

uh oh
the board

hunter biden

it is on the record....
yay

a reply to: Fallingdown

But in this case for Trump's impeachment i see still no wrong doing by Trump. Nor Proof. This show is becoming a sham, not a not lot of people are watching it at least where i am.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Pyle
So the GOP lawyer is asking the witness what another person thought.... does this guy even lawyer?

why not
it is all they had to offer all morning

why change now?

The council is prepping the arguments, not arguing, setting the corners. The shoes off the centipede are falling and that is felt in the room as fact. Windows into a person's thought through hearsay is beyond reasonable.

mg

a reply to: ChefFox

In my cubicle farm office like everybody here has the hearings on their second monitor and their headphones on.

Its rather surreal.......

this guy is good

all on the record now

they have legitimized the potus memo of the call

game
set
match

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: ChefFox

In my cubicle farm office like everybody here has the hearings on their second monitor and their headphones on.

Its rather surreal.......

it is rather important
undoing an election for no reason would be a bad deal

a reply to: Wayfarer

Here is an easy and honest straightforward question, forget about Trump for a minute. No tricks here, just a question.

Should Biden be removed from consideration as a Presidential Candidate for what he did as VP? Why or why not?

originally posted by: Wayfarer
Coercive behavior leveraging US funds for personal gain in an election is just about as 'textbook' as one can get regarding crimes of personal enrichment that harm the country.

Agreed. Trump didn't do this.

Next?

reported concern
hmmm

well now