It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Representative: Person that represents the will of the community.
Senator: Person that represents the will of the state.
Judge: Person that represents the definition of the law.
President: Person that enforces the law.
Fundamental civics of a Representative Republic. So a member of the House should vote in accordance to the wishes of their constituents, not their party affiliation and certainly not their own conscience. But as I said, that ship sank long ago.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Pyle
So the GOP lawyer is asking the witness what another person thought.... does this guy even lawyer?
The entire case against trump, including Taylor and Kents claims, are what what trumps thoughts were into why he wanted an investigation in Burisma and 2016 election interference.
I guess its only what Trump thought if you are ignoring all the evidence and other witnesses.
Here's your answer, In Biden's own words. There's more, but this is good for starters.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Ahabstar
Should Biden be removed from consideration as a Presidential Candidate for what he did as VP? Why or why not?
What did he do?
Well you can FEEL all you want and it doesn’t make it so. Also I’m not a MAN so please use the proper gender for me ... woman! But thanks for admitting your feelings about Trump are driving your opinion of the testimony.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
of course you don’t, because it’s more comforting to listen to some former diplomat say someone intimated to another person such and such and that’s clearly of course! Hahaha what a circus.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
It was hearsay with talk of vagueries like “intimated”, “indicated” and such. Where is the statement of Trump actual words to Ukraine ?
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus
Donald Trump, by clearly intimating that US funds to Ukraine were contingent on Ukraine investigating the Bidens.
Pretty simple.
We don't need Trump on record saying, "I am withholding this money until you investigate Biden", just as we didn't need Al Capone admitting tax evasion to throw his ass in jail.......
A preponderance of evidence is plenty to convict with in a normal scenario even without an admission of guilt from the person on trial.
I'm not comforted at all man. I am disturbed by what I'm hearing. I've always felt Trump is an evil awful man, and its disturbing to think I may have held too high an opinion of him.
MSM ignores it because Biden was "fighting corruption!".
originally posted by: ChefFox
a reply to: carewemust
The fact that he was filmed on camera. Bragging about it and still being protected by the mainstream news media really shows you something.
originally posted by: ChefFox
a reply to: Fallingdown
But in this case for Trump's impeachment i see still no wrong doing by Trump. Nor Proof. This show is becoming a sham, not a not lot of people are watching it at least where i am.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: LogicalGraphitti
It has nothing to do with feelings, despite your insistence/failed attempt to link my opinion via some silly voodoo to Trump's malfeasance.
Your 'feeling' excuse is just a misdirection because a more substiantiative argument you could make is rather vacuous.