It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Senate Impeachemt Vote

page: 5
17
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 10:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: shooterbrody
oh
the parties dont care about issues?


It's lip service and pandering. Call me when the Democrats give a crap about a reduced Federal government or when the Republicans learn not to spend like drunken slobs.

oh so both sides are bad so impeach?

seems lazy to me.....




posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer
just inquiring
no offense intended

I no longer abide surveys or polls



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 10:22 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Oh I wasn't offended, it was a fair question/point.




posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 10:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
oh so both sides are bad so impeach?

seems lazy to me.....


No, you impeach if the inquiry turns up something impeachable. You stop voting for Democrats and Republicans because they are both s***.



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus



No, you impeach if the inquiry turns up something impeachable.

based on what the s*** people are telling us?

mkay sounds reasonable..........



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
based on what the s*** people are telling us?


No, based on testimony and evidence. I like facts, not emotions.

When you have no horse in the race you can watch both parties detonate with equal joy.



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Trueman

No, I'm not an extremist and neither are most Americans.

I don't hate you; that's my point! I'm suggesting that's a planted belief from the media. I don't hate you and I don't hate Trump. Neither do most people. Disagreement is NOT hate.



"Disagreement is NOT hate."

I was called a racist because I didn't agree with obama's policies and he wouldn't release his birth certificate.
I was called a homophobe because I didn't agree with gay marriage.
I was called an islamaphobe because I didn't agree with muslims.
I was called a misogynist because I didn't agree with Hillary Clinton.

When do your double standards stop?
Asking for a friend.


And how did you call them?



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:26 AM
link   
a reply to: jrod




Criticism is a good thing but you Trump lovers call any criticism, no matter how much it is deserved hate against the President.


I can tell the difference between the blind hate you posted and criticism.
And then you back off and admit he's better than Hillary? I am a Trump
lover but I didn't become one until after the election. I didn't vote for him
but was smart enough to see he was gonna win. So I waited with open eyes
to see what kind of a President the man was gonna be. Americans made
the right choice proving finally once again a truth I have doubted all my
life. That any American really can become the POTUS. You call your
hate criticism. And I can't even understand how in the F#%$ the only
guy keeping us from being totally consumed by the psychos who own
us deserves even the slightest bit of your shameful crap. No matter
what you want to call it. No country can last when hate divides it. And
it worries me that the President hasn't been able to bring us beyond that.
But I can't even put the blame on him for that. " Oh but he is better than
Hillary!" Then be satisfied! STFU and let the man work!

( Oh but you're tired of) Phfff!


edit on 30-10-2019 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:47 AM
link   



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
so how do you determine if what the s*** people are telling you is the truth?
as it appears to me very little evidence has been put forward when the "special council" didnt recommend impeachment?



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
so how do you determine if what the s*** people are telling you is the truth?


I'm not sure to whom you're referring, the witnesses?



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
so how do you determine if what the s*** people are telling you is the truth?
as it appears to me very little evidence has been put forward when the "special council" didnt recommend impeachment?




ID the bullshlt first! Then the truth stands out.



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: shooterbrody
so how do you determine if what the s*** people are telling you is the truth?


I'm not sure to whom you're referring, the witnesses?

nope
those surrounding the witnesses
the ones who determine who gets to speak and for how long
the ones with the talking heads on the 24 hour channels



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
I haven't "been told" what the Mueller Report says, I've read it myself. Multiple times. I can recommend that to folks who have not and are going on the recommendations of their preferred corporate media.

Volume II consists of 182 pages of prosecutorial evidence and legal and Constitutional justifications for obstruction of justice on the basis of the Presidents actions.

I have included a series of citations with my own emphasis that outline my justification for my statement that Mueller handed the House an impeachment case on a silver platter.

Nah, your incapacity for rational, logical thought when discussing the simple Power of Impeachment really precludes me even half-heartedly trying to explain to you how ridiculous your analysis is...



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
nope
those surrounding the witnesses
the ones who determine who gets to speak and for how long
the ones with the talking heads on the 24 hour channels


Unless they are testifying I don't care. Like I said, I want to hear what the witnesses have to say.



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Gryphon66
I haven't "been told" what the Mueller Report says, I've read it myself. Multiple times. I can recommend that to folks who have not and are going on the recommendations of their preferred corporate media.

Volume II consists of 182 pages of prosecutorial evidence and legal and Constitutional justifications for obstruction of justice on the basis of the Presidents actions.

I have included a series of citations with my own emphasis that outline my justification for my statement that Mueller handed the House an impeachment case on a silver platter.

Nah, your incapacity for rational, logical thought when discussing the simple Power of Impeachment really precludes me even half-heartedly trying to explain to you how ridiculous your analysis is...


If you think that, why would you continue to reply? That seems illogical.



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: PolyATS
a reply to: Gryphon66


Trump Accomplishments


Thank you. I believe that's generally referred to as "tooting one's own horn."



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 11:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LSU2018
It's the actions of the DNC pushing them away and forcing them to team up with the other side.


Who cares? It's still voting from sentiment, or 'feelz' as you said, as opposed to issue-based voting.

Voting for someone because you think people are being mean to them is the epitome of voting your feelz.


But their issues are embarrassing, therefore running their people off.



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 12:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018
But their issues are embarrassing, therefore running their people off.


Embarrassment, like hate, is also an emotion. You know, feelz.



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 12:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


The report repeats the phrasing that the investigation did not exonerate nor find the President worthy of prosecution for obsruction of justice.

That is left up to the House of Representatives.


So it did. Thus why the House of Reps decided after interrogating Mueller and others to immediately impeach Trump, right? Oh wait, they didn't, did they. Instead, they grasped onto a 3rd party Whistle blower scheme and are now interrogating that issue.

Guessing...votes to impeach will be tabled same as the others that were brought to the floor by Rep Green. Thus why even now, no impeachment vote, just a inquiry only coming to the house floor.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join