It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We are also not talking about war and natural disaster, that is not choice, there is a huge difference.
I mean who the heck do the rich people think they are thinking they deserve all this nifty life extending healthcare built up through the blood and sweat of us peons who will never afford anything but the most basic care if we are lucky?
If we take the emotion out of this question...
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: Nyiah
hat'll be a jarring crash back to Earth, but they'll need some sweet, sweet Medicaid or Medicare help (depending on their ages) And maybe charity & government help to meet other expenses that can't be met because medical black holes adore wallets and government help alike.
You do realize you have compared choice to circumstance?
I doubt anyone wants aid to people in need dropped and we pay for the programs as an insurance you are speaking of.
those are not welfare.
Ah, the joys of reading backward through a thread.
Circumstance schmurcumstance. When it starts costing the public their taxes, who cares, right? If you're a drain, you're a drain, nobody needs to pay for your ill ass. Well, nobody but YOU. Much like the people harping on the poor & the costs of kids, if you can't live frugally enough to entirely pay for catastrophic health issues, you don't deserve anyone else's help to pay to stay alive, now do you?
Take it a step further. We pay taxes for a safety net to fall back on. In insurance, we all buy access into a gigantic pool of money to count on being able to draw from. In THAT light, if I were a prick, I'd be tempted to say I don't think I care about or want to pay for someone else's cancer treatment with my monthly cover charge. Not my genes going haywire, bruh, pay for it yourself.
.
originally posted by: ADUB77
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: ADUB77
Are you saying women do not pass on their genes ?
No, I’m saying that the Y chromosome is passed through the male and the Y chromosome decides the sex of the child
Also if you read above, if a male passes on an X to a women and they have a baby girl with genetic recombination whereas if the male passes the Y to the women and they have a boy there is much less genetic recombination as the y and x don’t mix and you would see the father’s genetics in the son more
so Yes women provide half genetics for the birth of a women and about 25 percent for the birth of a male so all in all about 38 percent and not half like you said
Humans normally carry 23 pairs of chromosomes: 22 autosomal pairs and one pair of sex chromosomes, either two copies of the X for a female or an X and a Y in the case of males.
By Mendel’s law of segregation you receive one copy of each pair from your mother (via the egg), and one copy from your father (via the sperm). This means exactly half of your genome derives from each parent.
originally posted by: mtnshredder
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: Nyiah
hat'll be a jarring crash back to Earth, but they'll need some sweet, sweet Medicaid or Medicare help (depending on their ages) And maybe charity & government help to meet other expenses that can't be met because medical black holes adore wallets and government help alike.
You do realize you have compared choice to circumstance?
I doubt anyone wants aid to people in need dropped and we pay for the programs as an insurance you are speaking of.
those are not welfare.
Ah, the joys of reading backward through a thread.
Circumstance schmurcumstance. When it starts costing the public their taxes, who cares, right? If you're a drain, you're a drain, nobody needs to pay for your ill ass. Well, nobody but YOU. Much like the people harping on the poor & the costs of kids, if you can't live frugally enough to entirely pay for catastrophic health issues, you don't deserve anyone else's help to pay to stay alive, now do you?
Take it a step further. We pay taxes for a safety net to fall back on. In insurance, we all buy access into a gigantic pool of money to count on being able to draw from. In THAT light, if I were a prick, I'd be tempted to say I don't think I care about or want to pay for someone else's cancer treatment with my monthly cover charge. Not my genes going haywire, bruh, pay for it yourself.
.
If I’m understanding you correctly they should have just let me die? What do you suggest I do? All ears here.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Today on a facebook page a local lady that helps people in need posted a bunch of needs/wants for some families.
Two of the three families are expecting a baby in addition to many other children. They have zero money, zero anything.
How on earth is this ok? In this day and age, birth control is everywhere, and it's free. I'd like to say it's rare, but it isn't.
Every day there are requests like this. Another friend asking for fresh fruits for people. Many working folks can't afford fresh fruit for their
own children...
I'm not some kind of cruel person. I know the desire for a women to have a child. I just don't think that their desire overrides
the responsibility of having one. Then that burden falls on everyone else. It falls on people that have been responsible their entire lives.
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
Yeah, it's nice to sit on my ass playing video games and eating chicken wings 18 hours a day sometimes, but I feel so empty if I don't get out and get some serious sheet done a couple of times a week!
There is definitely satisfaction from putting in a hard day's work, taking home YOUR income and affording your own games and wings.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
I'm not even gonna even bother answering this post since I have no idea what you are trying to say...
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: JAGStorm
Because a portion of American citizens are now quite fine with being dependent on either their government or other people to survive.
In fact, they feel it is their right.
Self-sufficiency is not only not taught anymore, it's considered old-fashioned.
And personal responsibility... pphhttt... there is always some boogie man holding them down.
Which is why socialism is also becoming popular.
originally posted by: lucidclouds
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
Yeah, it's nice to sit on my ass playing video games and eating chicken wings 18 hours a day sometimes, but I feel so empty if I don't get out and get some serious sheet done a couple of times a week!
There is definitely satisfaction from putting in a hard day's work, taking home YOUR income and affording your own games and wings.
What do you do to support that lifestyle?
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: NarcolepticBuddha
The one well versed in sports enough to carry on a conversation with the boss about this weeks college football games?