a reply to: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
He has already shown an interest (Gates Foundation) in sterilizing the African population without there consent through poisoned Vaccines as in these
news articles, not fake news but some may be heavily biased so reader beware.
These are also used as propaganda by Anti Vaccination believers, my personal take is that Vaccination is often necessary but it should NEVER be
compulsory, at heart the science behind vaccination is proven but it is also a medium as in these story's that can be used to illicitly deliver other
substances to the person's receiving those vaccines and there are extremists in the world that have abused this to do just that and whom should have
been put on trial for crime's against humanity.
So it really should come as no surprise that the Likes of Gates are willing to run roughshod over our ecology using the current climate crisis to
justify an action that would LIMIT food growth by reducing the light to food crop's and potentially causing famine as a result.
There are far superior method's of limiting solar radiation such as for example placing polarized transparent membranes in space, these satellites
would use ultra thin and light transparent membranes like a parasol around them once in orbit, these could then be used to block harmful wavelength's
while allowing enough of the full spectrum to still pass through them so as to minimize light reduction in the natural photosynthetic spectrum that is
necessary for plant's and of course food crop's (Let me clarify, they do not need to fill the entire sky just enough of them to reduce the total
amount of light and diffusion through the atmosphere should allow the remaining light to reach the ground in a more or less even amount so I am not
talking about filling the sky just speckling it enough with these light filtration satellites).
They could also use other methods such as spraying the surface of Glaciers that are currently retreating with non toxic, non polluting compound's to
reduce glacial retreat and to partially regulate it as well as IF he was serious about the climate and the people's well being rather than simply his
own ridiculous view of an ideal future buying up vast tracts of the rain forest to preserve it from the likes of scum like Bolsenaro and co, by the
way his buddies the Rothschild's already OWN all the right's to the mineral's there and they are not doing anything to stop that despicable man that
gained power in Brazil by falsely accusing there former moderate socialist and environmentalist leader of crimes he did not commit with a cabal backed
by other GLOBAL right wing villain's that would see our world burn for there own ideological money minded agenda.
Fact, there is enough arable land in the world to sustain a population perhaps at least 20 time's greater than the current global population -
Siberia, Argentina and indeed the US itself as well as with some proper irrigation put in place using water pump's, desalination plant's and artesian
well's the potential to turn many of the world's current dust bowl's AND DESERTS back into productive territory's but they would rather spend the
money on darkening the sky's? - were is the logic in that.
Hydropower sound's like a great example but in places like Ethiopia runaway Chinese money is putting vast tracts of arable land at risk by blocking
rivers end ending annual flood's that naturally irrigate and fertilize those regions leaving them to become new dust bowl's.
Also remember this fact, Climate Change does happen naturally, 50.000 years ago the blink of an eye in geological term's African animals roamed much
of southern Europe and African plant's and Savannah like condition's and weather cycles were the norm with an average far higher temperature in the
region compared to today, it is just a part of the global cycle and we are technically still in a global cycle of ice ages, it was actually warmer
than today just before the start of the last ice age.
Gate's could if he was a HUMANITARIAN invest in school's, better education is a far superior method of limiting population as give people job's,
careers and professions and they tend to leave off having kid's till later in life, teaches them the importance of there ecology and gives them new
He could invest in hydroponics's research which has the potential to increase crop production per hector by hundreds or even thousands of fold.
I could go on and on and on.
Spraying the atmosphere with chemical's should only ever be a very last resort and there may come a time when it is the only solution as the greedy
rich will have dragged there feet too long until the smell of there tree burning tell's them that they had better put the fire out of else there own
tree house is going to fall.
But until then we will be pissing into the wind trying to tell them fact's they already know but don't care about.
You know some estimates say that before the Conquistadors took south America despite the far larger population today that those old cultures produced
perhaps at least as sixty percent MORE food than today, maybe there population was far larger than we have been led to believe as in fact the Lidar
discovery of the ancient Mayan megalopolis would suggest.
So even there with no modern technology, just using there own ingenuity the native people's produced enough food to feed two or three or even ten
time's the current south american population and if we extend that over the world even without Bayers/Monsanto's poison and get some of those
un-corrupted native crop's back into production not the GM # they are forcing on people that requires there poisonous chemical's to blossom then we
can still grow the world's population and with proper education we can do it in harmony with nature and F the scum that are profiting from the scare
mongering and hatred of humanity.
The problem we have today is Plastics and that is about consumer based society and culture as well as the profit driven reticence to use
biodegradable alternatives which is harming our planet far more than even climate change.
edit on 14-8-2019 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)