It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bill Gates backing plan to stop climate change by blocking out the sun

page: 4
21
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: UpIsNowDown

I get what you're saying, I just don't agree with the analogy. We've been wanting a wall for decades. Every American supported it until Trump vowed to build it.


Why are people in this thread discussing the wall in the US?

this has nothing to do with the wall and /or Trump,




posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 02:58 PM
link   
google "albedo modification" or "solar radiation management"... they've been thinking about doing this crap for a while. They're Likely already trying it without public consent.

edit on 14-8-2019 by cooperton because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 02:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: StoutBroux

Yep. We (NW Louisiana) average around 95° this time of year. Last week or the week before, we had highs in the low 80's, yesterday we had a high of 105°. This weather has been far wonkier than I've ever seen it.


I've been thinking for a few years now tha weather is being manipulated somehow.

Gates is probably thinking about testing this idea in Africa or Imdia first... mind you, I think it could take ages for any effect to be seen but i really think its a bad idea to mess with the planets naturalness.

And then we have China building Suns... cant make it up



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Bluntone22

Just got out of the office and saw this thread, was looking for this exact response. Not disappointed at all.



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 03:15 PM
link   
a reply to: LSU2018


My God man, how did we get such retards in power to make ridiculous claims like this? 2020 marks the year a Grand Solar Minimum is supposed to start. For the last 10,000 years this GSM has been right on the tick in accuracy and this is supposed to be the worst GSM in 12,500 years. Almost at a threat to civilization level. We're supposed to feel the effects around 2024 or so and it will last 35 years. The last one ended in the late 17th century. If these morons try to block out the sun, it would destroy humanity. #ing idiots. Even if the GSM doesn't happen, blocking the sun is how the last Ice Age started and I can guarantee you the ree ree's behind the AGW hoax would never survive even a mini ice age.


This is the reason I posted on this, people should really wake themselves up before big shift happens.

PIers Corbyn on the coming mini ice age



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 03:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: TruthxIsxInxThexMist

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: UpIsNowDown

I get what you're saying, I just don't agree with the analogy. We've been wanting a wall for decades. Every American supported it until Trump vowed to build it.


Why are people in this thread discussing the wall in the US?

this has nothing to do with the wall and /or Trump,


too much GOT in their heads



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 05:08 PM
link   
lol

Isn't there a movie about that? Snowpiercer or something like that



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 06:16 PM
link   
This is unacceptable!



The researchers said last year, ‘Dozens of countries would have both the expertise and the money to launch such a program. ‘Around 50 countries have military budgets greater than $3 billion, with 30 greater than $6 billion.’


So this sounds so familiar, its pretty much what many were
concerned about with geoengineering.

This is unacceptable!

I thought Trump had done away with the U.S. part in Climate Change?

What the hell?



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 07:24 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

This has nothing to do with Trump.



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 08:28 PM
link   
These are the kinds of solutions that I think will be implemented in the end to stop climate change, as it is fairly obvious that limiting pollution isn't going to happen anytime soon.

Also, ignoring a real problem is only going to make conservatives lose votes over the next decade if they don't change their ways, as many voters are intelligent enough to see the effects of climate change with their own eyes, and denying/covering up science just prolongs how long conservatives can get away with being wrong.

It seems a bit risky, but that's the price you pay for preventing climate catastrophe. Good idea, though! It's a productive way to solve the problem instead of a limiting way. It might be something conservatives could get behind if it doesn't affect businesses as much.
edit on 14pmWed, 14 Aug 2019 20:30:24 -0500kbpmkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)

edit on 14pmWed, 14 Aug 2019 20:30:48 -0500kbpmkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 15 2019 @ 06:54 PM
link   
I thought the world was entering into a mini ice age. Looks as though the globalists need to get their stories in sync with one another.
a reply to: TruthxIsxInxThexMist



posted on Aug, 16 2019 @ 06:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Gothmog
That was one of my first thoughts...

So we partially block the sun yay cooler temps, then we enter into a cooling period or a major volcanic eruption now temps are cold growing seasons are screwed and people starve because we choose to block the sun.


The cynical side would say they want to people to starve and reduce the worlds population dramatically. We are too numerous and refuse to listen to them about it. I suggest they off their damn selves if they truly feel this way.



posted on Aug, 16 2019 @ 06:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Serdgiam

There are all kinds of clean renewable energy alternatives. Personally, I think solar and wind is not the answer because of how sporadic they are.

Nuclear, geothermal, OTEC are all stable energy suppliers, but they require a large upfront investment to start generating electricity and coal is cheap. So until we are forced to make those investments they will not happen because of simple greed.


I agree 100%.

The car that I keep espousing that uses water, cracks it for H2 and O2 that wins 1st prize every time it is entered into an alternative fuel contest. This is at 25+ years of existence and we still don't have one. Al Gore was at the school that built it at the time it was made famous. Here we are and Al is real real rich and that car that could save the environment is still a one of a kind car with no fleet yet in the offing.

edit on 16-8-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2019 @ 11:27 PM
link   
This is the dumbest idea ever. Think global cancers and population reduction. People dropping dead en mass like flies sprayed with bug spray. Every action has a consequence in nature. I would rather see all the city lights on the planet shut off at 10 pm until 6 am. People need to reduce, reuse, recycle, donate, compost, drive far less, consume less, eat less beef, don't clear the trees. The last recession slowed down things because people had to economically change their behavior to make do. Spraying the air with toxic chemicals is ethically and intellectually wrong. I guess you can't fix stupid. So don't be stupid.



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join