It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by soficrow
"We've been fighting war for how many thousands of years for peace and look where we are," she said. "We have to learn how to get along."
Originally posted by ADVISOR
It don't matter to me if people disagree or not. That is their perogative, I'm just trying to be a contributing member while also modding. EXCUSE me if you hold it against me. It matters not to me one way or another what some one thinks of me, unless it is my employer, but that is another thing entirely. I take critisism very well, some times too well, enough to unnerve those giving it. Meet me in person you'll understand.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
We are living in a fascist state, but Grady seems to think we're communists for wanting to put an end to it.
Corporate control of public policy led us into the war that took this young man's life.
..............
Originally posted by Netchicken
In order to bring this debate around to its original purpose. The mother has no say in whether her son''s life was wasted or not.
The woman is really saying "I don't agree with the war in iraq, that is a waste". which is different from accusing her sons death of being a waste.
She is politicising a death for her own benefit.
Would the mother of a policeman publically state the "waste" if her son died in the line of duty, killed by a dumd kid with a gun?
Its the politicization of the events in Iraq and their reporting in the press as such that is the cause for grating in this thread, not the actual death of the soldier. The twisting of a death to score political points.
Obviously the moral of the story is that if you don't want to be a tool of the state then get out of the military, otherwise you, or your relatives, have no cause for complaint.
Complaints tend to rise from emotions, which always have a 'cause' - do you mean they don't have a right? Or are not 'reasonable' and logical?
Originally posted by Netchicken
Certianly she is in a great deal of pain, and that pain is expressed in her hatred of the war in Iraq for "taking" her child.
However her statement is based on her personal ideology. If your child joins the military, then be prepared for them to die in the line of duty. its not a knitting club, without risk. Her grief at losing her son is expressed in her hatred of what happened in Iraq.
It doesn't mean that what she says has any realisitic or objective reality.
Would she make those statements if he supported the war?
What is annoying and almost frivoilous about the event is that the mothers grief, instead of being understood in the context of loss that it is, is exploited for political gamesmanship.
Now whats the bigger crime, a soldier is lost in the fulfillment of his duties, or a mother is exploited in her grief?