Missions are planned years ahead and only people with no knowledge of camera sensors don't understand why a certain type is used, a normal camera
sensor won't be any good under the conditions they would have to work under.
Ken Johnston [now claims to be reincarnation of king of the annunaki's starship pilot] -- see www.jamesoberg.com...
Donna Hare [story improves every year] .. a photo tech, was a UFO contactee who published a newsletter about people including herself who had met
space aliens– maybe the perfect foil for co-workers who might like to tease and tickle her fancy. Every few years she suddenly ‘remembers’ more
and more lurid details of alien photographs she saw forty years ago but had ‘forgotten’ about until her next chance to be on TV [like recently she
'remembered' she saw moon pix being retouched, she had forgotten until she saw another guy on TV jog her memory].
Karl Wolfe, recalls he accidentally heard of moon cities on the back side of the moon -- supposedly two years before NASA probes took any photos of
that area. He might also have been remembering a Disney TV special a few years earlier [about a future round-the-moon astronaut mission] which showed
SFX of exactly such a discovery. But since then half dozen countries have photographed the s--t out of the moon and found nothing ETI-ish there
anywhere. Gordon Cooper says he lookd over all the moon photos and saw no ET traces. Ed Mitchell circled the moon for days and insists he saw no
alien stuff there.
originally posted by: EnigmaChaser
In scanning the pictures of Mars I realized that a lot of them are from the Rover - not the recon orbiter or HiRise.
What "recon orbiter" are you talking about, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, the satellite that has, among other cameras, HiRISE?
- mess significantly with the color of the original photo to create illusions/depth perception issues/blend lines/etc.
HiRISE photos are monochromatic, no colours in them.
- significantly darken shadows to make them look like black splotches.
Using the raw images you can adjust the light levels with ease.
- enhance the grain of the photo to make it very hard to clean up or sharpen the image.
It's true that some photos have more grain, but I don't think it's added.
- display the picture online in an orientation that’s not what the picture “should be” - eg upside down.
It's not the first time I see someone presenting that as a way to "obscure" the supposed important information on the photos, and I think that's just
silly, as rotating images is very easy and some people do not even need to do that, they can see patterns on any position.
- provide inaccurate scale or positioning information to make you look at the picture inaccurately.
Raw photos do not have scale or positioning information.
This means you are thrown way off from what’s actually in the picture and it’s NOT smudges or airbrushing.
Only if you are easily fooled.
I encourage you to go back through and old NASA color photos and adjust color settings/contrast/etc to bring a lot more detail out - NOT
filtering! Brings out so much detail.
No, any adjustment will either make no difference or it will lose detail, there's no magic way of bringing out much detail, so if some parts appear
more detailed that means other parts are losing detail.
And as the time of my posting I can’t access the HiRISe website any longer and the rest of my internet works just fine....
No problems at this moment.
PS: could you post some examples of what you're talking about? That would help.
The old you can’t create a sound argument on actual evidence so watch this YouTube propaganda video argument. Classic conspiracists ploy. Why
should I find those videos anymore credible than anything else. Can you please quote the well structured and convening argument? Especially people
that cannot provide actual evidence to give their account context.
Oh come on man that Lady Donna hair and the others are not lying, of course they are not currently employed by NASA -
(and some have had book deal's and lucrative work out of there claim's but at least they are bringing it to the public attention and the first few to
make the same claim's made no money out of it did they - which does posit the potential of disinformation since let's be fair UFO in general are
excellent cover for black project aerial testing)
- that agency is up someone's arse so far it look's like they have a second pair of leg's sticking out of there Uranus now doesn't it - sorry not you
yourself I actually believe you believe what you are saying and otherwise even if you knew different could not tell us what you really know - if you
know anything outside of your own compartmentalized roles within the agency's and it's contractors so this while a blanket statement is not against
you or your colleagues but I do believe there are many thing's to which perhaps more than 99 percent of NASA employees and affiliates are not privy
and which do indeed pertain to this subject - so is it really so far beyond your scope of belief that some of your fellow workers there in other roles
may sometimes come into contact with facts of which you are either not aware or regard as simply rumours that you do not yourself believe.
I mean let's be fair the likes of Paul Hellyar was neither suffering from mental degeneration due to his age OR mentally deficient but he also made
claim's and that guy was one of CANADA's minister of defence so worked very closely with the US and other NATO defence ministers.
While not one of YOU he was no slouch as far as his intellect was concerned.
OF COURSE GIVEN THE US BLACK AGENCY'S PROPENCITY TO USE MENTAL WARFARE TECHNIQUES TO SHUT PEOPLE UP AND GIVEN THAT THIS GENTLEMAN MAY HAVE COME INTO
CONTACT WITH VERY HIGHLY CLASSIFIED DATA IT IS POSSIBLE THEY THREW A WAMMY AT HIM AND HE WAS THEREFORE AFFECTED - but I think not since if they were
caught doing that to the defence minister of one of there closest allies I am sure the repercussions would have been almost apocalyptic and Canada
have seldom been frightened of arguing with the US and even preparing to defend itself against attempted US annexation which several of your
president's have wanted to complete over the last two century's.
And of course as to your agency destroying and tampering with Images let's have a quick look at this shall we. www.ufocasebook.com...
And as for that Wikileak's guy Julian Assange - never really looked at this site BUT when did your government start walking down the road of
silencing the free press when in fact the free press is an essential part of your nation's constitution, a free and informed electorate to decide whom
would represent them (them not the corporation's but of course we live in this world not the idealistic fantasy world of free speech and living in the
truth now don't we).
Of course while you claim this is all a hoax haven't more than one of your astronaut's used the code phrase "There is a Santa Clause" on more than
one occasion which was code for unidentified object flying or in space.
I do not want to be reciprocal but you know we could go on and on and on like a 1980's Ariston advert here but the fact is you and some of the
other's here will never accept and will always argue against the facts - even to the point of denying they are facts and yet in today's world you do
realize that it is you now we that are starting to sound like flat earthers.
The Answer may surprise YOU, what he read was confirmed by a US general whom told him so and of course he could and would never speak of classified
document's that came before him so would of course refer to the data that is already within the public grasp since he is covered by the same law's as
everyone else were secrecy is concerned and of course would have enforced those laws upon others so would in good conscience never break them himself
just to validate his word's.
I mean look at that Assange guy, most of the crap he printed was probably disinformation, some was indeed dirty laundry but not enough for the US to
be baying for his blood like they are - which probably mean's they think he has information he has not revealed and they are desperate to keep a lid
on it by fair mean's or foul - mostly foul.
And still no picture presented as doctored for nefarious reasons by NASA in a thread titled “ More Potential Ways NASA Doctors Photos“. But lots
of BS claims with no evidence...... lots of innuendo......
Astroengineer's story appears to be fiction written by a very good technical writer. As for the conveyance that JPL is using quantum entanglement for
instantaneous data transmission with the Mars rover is pure BS.
The writer's statement of being able to use the 'sudo' command to be able access the entire JPL network is more BS.
As one of the commenters of the article said, the story is nothing but nerd porn.
Now why don't I respond by asking you to prove that they do not obfuscate data.
Here is the image shown on this video you linked to downloaded from the NASA site.
That image has 117825 unique colours.
Here it is in photoshop brightness turned up and contrast boosted. No box round it as claimed in the video these guys set out to fool the gullible and
that proves to easy.
Doesn't match the claim of the video does it each time an image is downloaded and saved as a lossy image format jpeg for example it will lose
The idiot who made this claims thats why they are no stars showing around the Earth even the basics of exposure are a mystrey to him. Now if you
didn't notice that then you haven't a clue re digital images/photography you have shown that many times
edit on 23-5-2019 by wmd_2008 because:
(no reason given)
edit on 23-5-2019 by wmd_2008 because: missing word
I do not believe we are at that level yet but that does not mean that such technology is impossible, if matter is mostly empty space and can be
regarded as informational states on the superstring/field of the universe and if we have already been able to teleport POTENTIAL information via
quantum entanglement then if we can unlock the underlying mechanism there is no doubt a possible solution that would allow matter to be transported,
the key may be not to transport the matter but to exchange the space within which the matter exists using such an entanglement method.
It would also (I am not a fan of Hubbard and I know he came up with something similar in his cheap and nasty sci fi novel battlefield earth though of
course his characters could move between universe as well) posit that if small displacement's of this type were possible and had been achieved then it
could even be used create vehicles that seemed to move at incredible speed, make instant right angle course changes or even instantly zip back along
there own previous trajectory with no velocity change - because they would not actually be moving kinetically so no velocity would be present and this
would also mean no inertia other than that imbued upon them by there originating location relative to there destination location.
Therefore I would argue that while it may not yet have been achieved by us there will be someone somewhere working on trying to solve that as a
potential weapon delivery, troop movement and space deployment method.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.