It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
you know what, Ive got a question for those who think that creation isnt true.
if the universe is less than 20billion years old, how are there stars out there that they claim to be 100 billions lightyears away.
Ibut the creationists answer would be that God made the light already visible to the earth. because they are for signs and seasons.
experiments have been done where they sped light up to 300 times faster than the speed of light and theyu also slowed light down all the ways to a dead stop.
Originally posted by riley
I notice how you completely avoided my other questions.. again. Seems to be a habbit of yours.
Please don't just change the subject, avoid points or answer questions with questions or 'it's wrong so there'/'the bible says otherwise' without providing evidence to back your opinion. Why is australia not in the bible? How were koalas rescued? How were they fed? Why were aboriginals spared by the flood.. and why did they never hear about the OT? How did dinosaurs end up inside rock that are millions of years old if they were rescued by Noah 6000 years ago? Did he travel back in time before humans existed?
Originally posted by Joshm2u
ok Nygdan, i know this doesnt have much to do about Noah's ark, but it has to do about questions regarding the big bang. if there was a big bang then why are some galaxies spinning clockwise, and other counterclockwise??
There is no physical law that states that when an explosion occurs all particles will be spinning in the same direction.
Originally posted by riley
I'm unsure what point you are making with this.. it says amber can take millions of years to form.
[edit on 29-7-2005 by riley]
link
But there are fossils that have been formed in the last few thousand years
in the ocean. This has been known for over 45 years. L. G. Weeks reports on
the occurrence of fossilized fish in concretions formed during the past few
thousand years,
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
actually the law of conservation of angular momentum actually does have an effect on the big bang, josh is right about this, the law covers more than what I am about to cover but it does in fact cover this.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
also how did
this bettle evolve its defense mechanism according to evolution?
The Big Bang wouldn't come to be commonly accepted if it violated major laws of physics.
its accepted by most people who dont understand the laws of physics, they just accept is because it elimitates God (at least thats the way I see it)
also if there was no space to begin with, how did it expand when there was nothin to expand? how did matter expand into space that did exist?.
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required
No, people accept the theory because evidence backs it up and the theory itself had predicted many physical phenomena which have been discovered to exist.
Originally posted by Joshm2u
have you ever heard of occam's razor?
that is it. its much simplier to say that God created the earth, then theorizing about superfast inflation, and soup, and just throwing in billions of years in there for fun.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
its accepted by most people who dont understand the laws of physics, they just accept is because it elimitates God
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
(at least thats the way I see it) also if there was no space to begin with, how did it expand when there was nothin to expand? how did matter expand into space that did exist?
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
the beetle is able to defend itself from it predators [by use of explosive chemicals] because God designed it that way.
the bettle doesnt need to fly, why would it need to fly, us people dont need to fly, it would be nice, but we dont need to fly.
many things dont need to fly.
I dont see the point in the ability to fly not being there.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
in reply to the reason why australia is not in the bible. well if you are trying to follow the geneology up until Jesus is born and a few generations after or so; you need to follow only certain people, now the bible cannot teach everything, it cannot follow every single path of diversion. it follows everything that is important to man determind by God.
if you havent noticed the bible follows a certain path of geneology, and in order to get to Jesus, you have to follow a certain path of geneology, that is the most probable answer I know of.
Matter didn't expand, Space-time expanded.
Actually It was Sir Fred Hoyle, an astronomer who understood physics, came up with The Big Bang. Why would people accept it just because it eliminates God? Could it just make more sense to them?
I think it got that way because of necessity.-
This still doesn't account why australia does not get a mention in the bible.. or why aborigines did not believe in god.. and why they have no record of Noah.
How did dinosaurs end up inside rocks that are millions of years old if they were rescued by Noah 6000 years ago? Did he travel back in time before humans even existed?