It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mueller sends report on Trump investigation to AG Barr

page: 3
47
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 05:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: network dude

Does anyone really believe it would ever lead to impeachment?


Presumably the voters who bought the "We will impeach him!" line of BS by many of the candidates leading to the midterm elections did... I assume they won't be as gullible next election cycle and many may even be pissed rightly off and feel like certain agendas are no longer working for them.




posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 05:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

The thread title is misleading because the implication could be drawn that the investigation was into Trump personally.

The investigation was into Russian interference in the 2016 elections.

edit on 22/3/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 05:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Grambler

The thread title is misleading because the implication could be drawn that the investigation was into Trump personally.

The investigation was into Russian interference in the 2016 elections.

Uh , no
Just no
It was about the left's TDS in that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians .
That was the official statement by Mueller. At the start.
Where do you get your information ?



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 05:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

Actually it was about the leftist attempts to circumvent the will of the American people in hopes they could maintain power to further their agenda of a tyrannical totalitarian State.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

NARRATIVE SHIFT!!! NARRATIVE SHIFT!!!



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Grambler

The thread title is misleading because the implication could be drawn that the investigation was into Trump personally.

The investigation was into Russian interference in the 2016 elections.


Wow. I'd anticipated some menatl gymnastics, but not this angle.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

The back peddling from the pundits in the coming days will probably be epic.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:05 PM
link   
He's RACIST and hates Muslims..... As the Narrative Turns.....



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:16 PM
link   
Mueller not recommending any further indictments pretty much ends this. Those who committed actual crimes have been indicted and tried in many cases and that's all there will be.

It will be chopped up into sound bites and used by both parties as propaganda. Legally it's over. Unless SDNY actually charges and convicts him of an impeachable offense, any impeachment effort could never make it through the Senate.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Grambler

The thread title is misleading because the implication could be drawn that the investigation was into Trump personally.

The investigation was into Russian interference in the 2016 elections.


Really?

If thats the case, why werent hillarys team connections to russians and the kremlin agents that gave her team dirt on trum[p investigated?



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:18 PM
link   
The real problem here is that future presidents will face increasing unfounded obstruction that will make the last two years look like the "new normal". Eventually nothing will ever get done in Washington and in State Governments as we move from one unfounded investigation to the next while the rest of the country crumbles. Good job Democtrats


To be clear I don't think Republicans are any better; they would have done the same ... but it was still the Democrats who actually did it.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

OBAMA set the precedent

Sitting presidents need only pay for rumors now to weaponize the inetl agencies to spy on their opponents.

I will argue against this future.

Buit every singkle person who cheered for this witch hunt into trump will have no right to complain.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

You didn't expect a President who was denied a supreme court pick to take it lieing down did you? Especially one with a known history of weaponizing government agencies like the IRS. Someone had to pay for the slight; to bad it's always the American people.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 06:31 PM
link   
Reply to burdmann

Collective of Asses? That should be the new name of the Democrat party.
edit on 22-3-2019 by MRinder because: Spelling

edit on 22-3-2019 by MRinder because: To add



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 07:00 PM
link   
Trump is not going to be impeached. What would be the point? He's not going to be reelected. If he gets impeached, that would leave Pence in charge. That's the last thing the Democrats want. A competent opponent who would be much harder to vilify than Trump and generally seems like an OK guy.

Trump is a great asset to the Democrats if they want to energize their base by pointing out how utterly unlikable this man is. How are they going to get their base to hate Pence with the same energy as they clearly do Trump?

Nope. They can use this kind of hatred and they're not gonna waste it by trying to impeach Trump in the last year of his presidency. That would be sheer stupidity. The only thing that might change that game would be if RBG is forced into retirement before the election but my guess is they'd stall the next confirmation by some other means. And besides. It's not like Pence would nominate someone more moderate than Trump would. They'd be facing exactly the same scenario. There's no advantage here for them to impeach Trump.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 07:11 PM
link   
Let any American that wants to, read the Mueller report, make it public. We paid for it and we can make up our own minds.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 07:12 PM
link   
Tucker Carlson is playing clips of high ranking Democrats declaring in the past that there was evidence of collusion and how there would be indictments.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 07:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Trump is not going to be impeached. What would be the point? He's not going to be reelected. If he gets impeached, that would leave Pence in charge. That's the last thing the Democrats want. A competent opponent who would be much harder to vilify than Trump and generally seems like an OK guy.

Trump is a great asset to the Democrats if they want to energize their base by pointing out how utterly unlikable this man is. How are they going to get their base to hate Pence with the same energy as they clearly do Trump?

Nope. They can use this kind of hatred and they're not gonna waste it by trying to impeach Trump in the last year of his presidency. That would be sheer stupidity. The only thing that might change that game would be if RBG is forced into retirement before the election but my guess is they'd stall the next confirmation by some other means. And besides. It's not like Pence would nominate someone more moderate than Trump would. They'd be facing exactly the same scenario. There's no advantage here for them to impeach Trump.


So what you are saying is Trump can't possibly win in 2020, right?



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
Tucker Carlson is playing clips of high ranking Democrats declaring in the past that there was evidence of collusion and how there would be indictments.


I can't wait for the funny butt-hurt MSM and Dimocrat video collages to hit YouTube!



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Grambler

The thread title is misleading because the implication could be drawn that the investigation was into Trump personally.

The investigation was into Russian interference in the 2016 elections.

Uh , no
Just no
It was about the left's TDS in that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians .
That was the official statement by Mueller. At the start.
Where do you get your information ?



From his brief appointing him as Special Counsel.

As near as I can tell, the first use of the word "collusion" in regard to Mueller's investigation was Trump/Guiliani in a Tweet on February 16 2018.

As far as I have been able to determine, Mueller has not used the word "collusion" or "collude" once in regard to his investigations.

Of course, if there was no investigation into collusion, then there would be findings in that regard. Since the investigation wasn't into collusion, it is unlikely that there will be a finding of collusion.




top topics



 
47
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join