It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
Expect hundreds of rumors and accusations between now and when the public finally sees what's in it.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Grambler
I was just about to post this. Many many media sources tweeting about it separately so it looks legit. Wonder how much of it we'll see and when?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen
hMMM YEAH. Wasn't Rosenstein there just yesterday along with William Barr. Barr's was a regularly scheduled meeting but Rosenstein was not.
I think its very likely that it was delivered to him yesterday. The White house is saying they have not seen it yet.
"And wait until you see how it all ends up, you watch.
McCabe, Lisa Page, Strzok, wait until you see how that all ends up, including some others that I could name.
We’ll make -- we’ll make front page news if I do.
People are being exposed by this that are totally corrupt. A lot of the people that don't get mentioned even in that article today, the phony article in ‘The New York Times’, there's a lot of corruption, and we're exposing it.
And I’m going to put that down someday as one of my greatest achievements."
Sources familiar with the investigation believe there are no more indictments coming from the special counsel. If Mueller follows the guidance of the man who appointed him and supervised his investigation, he cannot publicly disparage those who have not been charged with a crime.
Rosenstein is emphatic on this point: "In fact, disclosing uncharged allegations against American citizens without a law-enforcement need is considered to be a violation of a prosecutor's trust."