It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Humans may one day have the ability to regrow limbs after scientists at Harvard University uncovered the DNA switch that controls genes for whole-body regeneration.
Some animals can achieve extraordinary feats of repair, such as salamanders which grow back legs, or geckos which can shed their tails to escape predators and then form new ones in just two months.
Planarian worms, jellyfish, and sea anemones go even further, actually regenerating their entire bodies after being cut in half.
Now scientists have discovered that that in worms, a section of non-coding or ‘junk’ DNA controls the activation of a ‘master control gene’ called early growth response (EGR) which acts like a power switch, turning regeneration on or off.
“We were able to decrease the activity of this gene and we found that if you don't have EGR, nothing happens," said Dr Mansi Srivastava, Assistant Professor of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University.
“The animals just can't regenerate. All those downstream genes won't turn on, so the other switches don't work, and the whole house goes dark, basically.”
The studies were done in three-banded panther worms. Scientists found that during regeneration the tightly-packed DNA in their cells, starts to unfold, allowing new areas to activate.
But crucially humans also carry EGR, and produce it when cells are stressed and in need of repair, yet it does not seem to trigger large scale regeneration.
Scientists now think that it master gene is wired differently in humans to animals and are now trying to find a way to tweak its circuitry to reap its regenerative benefits.
originally posted by: LightSpeedDriver
a reply to: neoholographic
Don't trust scientists promising a 300 year life span. Who wants to live that long? Do you?
originally posted by: Duderino
originally posted by: LightSpeedDriver
a reply to: neoholographic
Don't trust scientists promising a 300 year life span. Who wants to live that long? Do you?
In the middle ages, when a life span was 30-40 years, imagine someone saying, "Who wants to live 80 years, a 100? I get everything I need done in 40 years."
Life was simple then and 40 years was truly enough for a simple, average life.
Now, 80-90 years is not enough for everything this planet has to offer.
In a century or two, 300-400 years won't be enough, because there will be so much space to see and systems to visit and explore.
There will always be things to do and learn.
originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: LightSpeedDriver
You said:
Don't trust scientists promising a 300 year life span. Who wants to live that long? Do you?
This is just egocentric thinking. It doesn't matter if you want to live for 200-300 years or not. It's not about you. Maybe future generations will need longer lifespans to colonize space. So again, this has nothing to do with you. If you want to die and not live longer, maybe you can just ask for the needle and go to sleep.
originally posted by: Duderino
originally posted by: LightSpeedDriver
a reply to: neoholographic
Don't trust scientists promising a 300 year life span. Who wants to live that long? Do you?
In the middle ages, when a life span was 30-40 years, imagine someone saying, "Who wants to live 80 years, a 100? I get everything I need done in 40 years."
Life was simple then and 40 years was truly enough for a simple, average life.
Now, 80-90 years is not enough for everything this planet has to offer.
In a century or two, 300-400 years won't be enough, because there will be so much space to see and systems to visit and explore.
There will always be things to do and learn.
originally posted by: Archivalist
a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
People like to say everything looks like binary. Binary is the chicken of math, everything tastes like it.
Hello, I actually studied binary in school, across 4 or 5 classes. All mathematical systems can be broken down into binary no matter what base system they consist of. DeMorgan pretty much proved that all mathematical calculations are reproducible in strict binary, no matter how complex they are. George Boole even attempted logic that incorporated binary and added a third "fuzzy" logic feature. It can be argued as tertiary or binary+RNG. Honestly, even that, by mathematical law, can just be broken down into binary actions, as per DeMorgan.
originally posted by: LightSpeedDriver
originally posted by: Duderino
originally posted by: LightSpeedDriver
a reply to: neoholographic
Don't trust scientists promising a 300 year life span. Who wants to live that long? Do you?
In the middle ages, when a life span was 30-40 years, imagine someone saying, "Who wants to live 80 years, a 100? I get everything I need done in 40 years."
Life was simple then and 40 years was truly enough for a simple, average life.
Now, 80-90 years is not enough for everything this planet has to offer.
In a century or two, 300-400 years won't be enough, because there will be so much space to see and systems to visit and explore.
There will always be things to do and learn.
Even in the "middle ages" there were two classes of people who often reached the age of 70 in contrast to the rest of the population. Clergy and royalty. Fact.
originally posted by: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
a reply to: neoholographic
Not binary. Think a bit.
AT, CG, GC, and TA.
Looks to me more than just "0" or "1". Were looking at a base-4 codon at the least (there are: strong, weak, keto, amino, etc. version of those listed, and then the inverse of those). Who's to say that they are not double or triple word lengths of that? Heck, the "junk DNA" was not junk (been saying that for years), it is that it was not active in cell development so it was politely ignored and misnamed. So what is that, 2^4 combinations already without leaving the gate!
Now, studying a worm, they found that the "junk DNA" under certain conditions unfold and is "read" creating the regeneration instruction. Remember, this is for a specific type of worm!
I am more intrigued with the DNA folding! How does it know where to fold? How does it know to unfold? How does it get a signal from, uh, me, down to the DNA-level that says, "We need a new liver! TEOTs destroying the one he's got..." LOL!
The study is interesting to note but me getting a new eye on demand from my own DNA will happen long after I am gone!
ETA: Source, phys.org, and on Pi Day! lol.
Study uncovers genetic switches that control process of whole-body regeneration.