It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thesun
some of the moon rocks were given to other countries to test and analys,
china was one of the countries given moon samples to test and analys and it is pretty obvious that the rocks were genuine
Originally posted by Badge01
Do we know these rocks weren't retrieved by unmanned probes, created in a lab, or found in Antarctica?
Too many questions to use this as a proof.
Indeed, says McKay, faking a Moon rock well enough to hoodwink an international army of scientists might be more difficult than the Manhattan Project. "It would be easier to just go to the Moon and get one," he quipped.
In this case, you claim that "thousands" of scientists in the world have tested and confirmed the authenticity of the "Moon rocks". How can you do that? Did they transport all the rocks from country to country and scientists tested each rock
Originally posted by Badge01
Moving right along, tell me, who took this picture?
Originally posted by numb99
I hope you were joking, but a remote controled camera. Same that shot the lanuch from the moon.
Originally posted by Badge01
Originally posted by numb99
I hope you were joking, but a remote controled camera. Same that shot the lanuch from the moon.
No, Numb99, I'm not joking at all.
Consider the logistics. This camera, allegedly operated from Earth was able to find a perfectly framed picture of the footer of the LEM after blast off and at the same time, get a picture of the rising Earth in the same frame. I can't imagine a more perfectly posed picture.
In addition, if you look at the relation of the camera to the LEM at blast off it was not this far away nor in this orientation. So, tell me, did they have two cameras?
Maybe a silly question, but why isn't this camera still in operation? Anyone know what kind it was supposed to be? Was it a live feed?
Originally posted by numb99
Maybe your image was croped.
Originally posted by swimmer
In this case, you claim that "thousands" of scientists in the world have tested and confirmed the authenticity of the "Moon rocks". How can you do that?
Did they transport all the rocks from country to country and scientists tested each rock and came to a 100% conclusion that they had to be from the Moon and that they had to had been brought by humans?
Whose signiture is on the reports? Where was the testing done?
(Give me a few million dollars, and I will find thousands of scientists who will sign that the Earth is flat. )
But, in this case, NOBODY signed that.
Nobody required REAL testing, because nobody dared to officialy dispute "Moon landing" fairy tale.
Originally posted by Badge01
JRA posted a very good link. But if you read carefully it does not say that 'faking' a Moon rock is impossible, merely difficult:
However compelling, it still doesn't rule out that the samples of rocks that were sent out for analysis were collected in Antarctica and by unmanned probes.
Moving right along, tell me, who took this picture?
www.gernot-geise.de...
Originally posted by YASKY
One of the most telling things that proove NASA faked it all, is the fact that, Militaries even till this day have a hard time, testing Missiles, yet NASA tells us, 1960's Tech was able to control a camera 250,000 Miles away from Earth!!
Here let me be as specific as I can, Militaries have had a HARD TIME testing out "Remote Controlling" 1990's UAV's even though, it works, Only after a long test period, but NASA/U.S.-Gov wants us to believe 1960's Tech remote controlled the camera's on the moon, this is what prooves NASA is lying, plus my Hammer/Feather test would proove 1000% Apllo missions were FAKE!!!
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by YASKY
One of the most telling things that proove NASA faked it all, is the fact that, Militaries even till this day have a hard time, testing Missiles, yet NASA tells us, 1960's Tech was able to control a camera 250,000 Miles away from Earth!!
And what does a missile have to do with a remotely operated camera? The two things are not comparable. Could you also elaborate what you mean when you say that Militaries have a hard time testing missiles? In what way do they have a hard time with them and how does it apply to the Moon landings. Thank you.
Originally posted by YASKY
Here let me be as specific as I can, Militaries have had a HARD TIME testing out "Remote Controlling" 1990's UAV's even though, it works, Only after a long test period, but NASA/U.S.-Gov wants us to believe 1960's Tech remote controlled the camera's on the moon, this is what prooves NASA is lying
plus my Hammer/Feather test would proove 1000% Apllo missions were FAKE!!!
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by YASKY
Here let me be as specific as I can, Militaries have had a HARD TIME testing out "Remote Controlling" 1990's UAV's even though, it works, Only after a long test period, but NASA/U.S.-Gov wants us to believe 1960's Tech remote controlled the camera's on the moon, this is what prooves NASA is lying
I still don't see how an early UAV compares to a remote controlled camera. The remote controlled camera is pretty simple. If a guy on the ground in mission control wants to pan the camera to the left, he simply adjusts it on his end, the signal gets sent, and about two seconds later the camera pans to the left on the Moon. It's not rocket science. It's a lot like controlling an RC car one may have had as a kid, but over a greater distance. The technology involved isn't too complicated.
I think the problem with earlier UAV's was probably trying to get them to do things autonomously, I don't think there was much of a problem flying them like an R/C plane. Basic radio controlled airships have been around since the late 19th century.
plus my Hammer/Feather test would proove 1000% Apllo missions were FAKE!!!
Not really sure what you're hammer/feather test is exactly (the vacuum chamber stuff?) and how that would prove that it was fake. But without an atmosphere and no air resistance to slow down the feather, both would hit the ground at the same time. This is basic physics 101 kind of stuff. For example, I just took one AA battery and one USB drive. Both objects are roughly the same size, but are noticeably different in weight and neither are easily affected by air resistance. I dropped them both together a bit above 2m and both hit the ground at the same time. Try it yourself.
Originally posted by YASKY
1. Wrong the Tech in the Apollo missions, was not able to turn cameras, NASA will just lie, and remote controlling the Camera's would have been hard 250K miles away, no matter hwta NASA says
2. What was the time the AA batter and the USB Drive hit the ground at?