UFO: AirpScrlane-shape, Flashing Lights, Reflections (SpaceX Dragon launch)

a reply to: peacefulpete

I agree, the speed at which the UFO passes by at night is clearly faster than what can be seen in the daytime parts.
Shape and blinking lights all point to a regular airplane. But the altitude is impossible. Quite mysterious, indeed. For me this remains unexplained.

a reply to: SacredLore

How about the thunderstorm explanation?

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: SacredLore

How about the thunderstorm explanation?

There are actual thunderstorms in the 3.5 hr footage. And the storms look like bluish swirls and blobs of light.

If the idea is that the UFO is a city illuminated by thunderstorms... the city would not move as fast as the UFO does. (Recent posts, I pointed out parts of the vid showing lakes & rivers passing by, much more slowly than the UFO passes by.)

a reply to: peacefulpete
SpaceX has yet to comment on what went by the Dragon. Never mind what NASA says, they'll say it was a reflection of Uranus.

a reply to: peacefulpete

If the idea is that the UFO is a city illuminated by thunderstorms.

That's not what I said at all.

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: peacefulpete

If the idea is that the UFO is a city illuminated by thunderstorms.

That's not what I said at all.

Well then I was giving you too much of the benefit of the doubt, that you actually meant something.

Thunderstorms look like blue swirls of light, and the UFO obviously doesn't look like a blue blob of light.

a reply to: peacefulpete

Charming as ever.

Not quite true:



These ain't blue, are they?

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: peacefulpete

Charming as ever.

Not quite true:

These ain't blue, are they?

I was talking about SpaceX video of their Dragon launch. In which thunderstorms look like what I described.

You didn't post the SpaceX vid of the Dragon launch, did you?

a reply to: oldcarpy

Also why are you still posting when you just spent 2 weeks talking about how you're going to be off for a week "till next Tuesday?"

You never took off till last week's Tuesday OR this week's Tuesday.

WTF are you talking about?

a reply to: peacefulpete

I'll throw you a clue as you seem to be a bit lacking in that department - phonetic spelling.

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: peacefulpete

I'll throw you a clue as you seem to be a bit lacking in that department - phonetic spelling.

Now you're... just not posting about anything at all...

originally posted by: peacefulpete

I was talking about SpaceX video of their Dragon launch. In which thunderstorms look like what I described.

You didn't post the SpaceX vid of the Dragon launch, did you?

Spot on. I posted a video of a thunderstorm taken from the ISS that does not look like "blue swirls of light".

originally posted by: peacefulpete

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: peacefulpete

I'll throw you a clue as you seem to be a bit lacking in that department - phonetic spelling.

Now you're... just not posting about anything at all...

Probably best that you remain in the dark.

originally posted by: oldcarpy

originally posted by: peacefulpete

I was talking about SpaceX video of their Dragon launch. In which thunderstorms look like what I described.

You didn't post the SpaceX vid of the Dragon launch, did you?

Spot on. I posted a video of a thunderstorm taken from the ISS that does not look like "blue swirls of light".

...The topic is the SpaceX video of their Dragon launch...

originally posted by: oldcarpy

originally posted by: peacefulpete

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: peacefulpete

I'll throw you a clue as you seem to be a bit lacking in that department - phonetic spelling.

Now you're... just not posting about anything at all...

Probably best that you remain in the dark.

Well no, you're just posting unrelated things, which are very irrelevant to the topic. Which is not a way to make anyone interested in what you're posting.

If you post something RELEVANT to the topic, then I'll be very interested.

a reply to: peacefulpete

The topic is this supposed "UFO" of yours. Someone suggested it might be a thunderstorm so I put that up as a possible explanation. You said no, because thunderstorms look like"blue swirls of light". I showed you a video taken from the ISS of a thunderstorm that does not look like blue swirls of light.

Got it now?

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: peacefulpete

The topic is this supposed "UFO" of yours. Someone suggested it might be a thunderstorm so I put that up as a possible explanation. You said no, because thunderstorms look like"blue swirls of light". I showed you a video taken from the ISS of a thunderstorm that does not look like blue swirls of light.

Got it now?

...The topic is... the UFO... in the SpaceX video of their Dragon launch.

Posting different videos is irrelevant.

Got it now?

a reply to: peacefulpete

All right, pedanticpete - I give up.

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: peacefulpete

All right, pedanticpete - I give up.

Well are you sure you don't want to post a video of a thunderstorm, from the Weather Channel, and then talk about how it doesn't look blue?

a reply to: peacefulpete

But I posted a video of a thunderstorm from the ISS, in space. Just like your video that you posted from the ISS, in space, and it is not blue swirls as you said they are, is it?

I think something or other is severely affecting your mental capacity for rational thought so I will leave you to your tantrums and general ....whatever your problem might be.

Night, Night.